Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

The idea of terms like "islamofascism", "Fourth World War" and "World War 4" is to remind everybody that George W Bush, like every GOP leader, is the reincarnation (so to speak) of Winston Churchill, and that the war effort is so important that we have to make sacrifices, except where it's not.

The problem with this is that it reminds people that we survived ww2 without scrapping the constitution, or crushing children's testicles. Plus it brings back memories of anti-capitalist ideas like "shared sacrifice".

So what do we call the war? I'm partial to writing it as "World War ][ ][", pronounced "World War Two, Two". As in, the sequel to WW2. Only this time it's personal.

We must make some sacrifices for the war effort, like for example we have to give up the constitution. But no "excess profits taxes" like in WW2. Do your bit for the war effort by going to Disneyland. Sit down, shut up, go shopping.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

...So what do we call the war? I'm partial to writing it as "World War ][ ][", pronounced "World War Two, Two"...

As Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty" was, well, I don't know how to describe what happened, I guess "abandoned" would work (and still allow you to maintain the dillusion that the USA has never lost a war), maybe borrowing (borrowing from a Democrat? lol, nah, "recycling", yeah, that's better, even makes it sound like you give a shit for "green" issues), ok, recycling the name, but with an "improvement" or extension to make it seem more focused (in effect it's the exact opposite, but insane war spending just boosts the economy, right? it's not like you're going to have to deal with the exploding national debt because the Rapture is sure to happen soon), and hey presto we now have the "War on Poverty Stricken People". That's the ticket.

And if they're not actually poverty stricken before the War starts, well, you just have to do something about that first (Free Market Fred is your go-to guy on that front, I'm sure he could handle it for a suitable fee), and then nothing's stopping you.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

When did WWIII end?

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

When did WWIII end?

When Reagan won it. Watch the docudramas Rambo 3, Red Dawn, and Red Dawn.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

When Reagan won it. Watch the docudramas Rambo 3, Red Dawn, and Red Dawn.

A brilliant way to explain our present times, Brother Thurmond. We need to think of ourselves as being in a "Just War" like WWII.

We must fight to our rightous death against Satan and the socialist government of Obama. Yes!! WWII, WWII.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

We have to think about reaching out to the youth. They like to say "v2" which I am led to believe means "version 2." What about WWIIv2?

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

When Reagan won it. Watch the docudramas Rambo 3, Red Dawn, and Red Dawn.

Ah, so the cold war was WWIII, okay, that makes more sense.

[El Gibbon]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

Your human leaders never officially declared a war on the Soviet Union, therefore WWIII never occurred. Yes the name says war, but there was no conflict between the nations. The Cold War was simply an arms race.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

Your human leaders never officially declared a war on the Soviet Union, therefore WWIII never occurred. Yes the name says war, but there was no conflict between the nations. The Cold War was simply an arms race.

Quit trying to belittle REAL America's victory over socialism.

[Alterboy]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

It shall be a Holy War - where Christians defend the world from jihadists!

[El Gibbon]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

Quit trying to belittle REAL America's victory over socialism.

There was no "victory" against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The Soviet Union's government crumbled out from under its structure. The people of the former Soviet Union chose democracy. No victory for America. Only peace.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

There was no "victory" against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The Soviet Union's government crumbled out from under its structure. The people of the former Soviet Union chose democracy. No victory for America. Only peace.

The Soviet Union crumbled because of the personal efforts of Ronald Reagan and you know it. To claim otherwise is disingenuous.

Even by your own definition, the USSR failed because it was trying to keep up with the Christian efforts of the Reagan Administration, but they failed because they are God-less commies.



YiC,

Zech

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

Your human leaders never officially declared a war on the Soviet Union, therefore WWIII never occurred. Yes the name says war, but there was no conflict between the nations. The Cold War was simply an arms race.

The "Allies" occupying Germany remained an occupying force until the "Allies" held a meeting withdrawing. That was known as the reunification of Germany and marks the end of WWII.

The ongoing struggle of communism however, originally an internal dispute among socialists from the camps of national socialism in Germany and Marxism in Russia, launched temporarily successful invasions, unconnected with WWII, into China, North Korea, Rhodesia and numerous other countries of that type. That offensive ended with the lease of Hong Kong and liberation has now reached China. This victory is celebrated in the art of Hu Ming, for example.

But no-one seemed to have informed the Kim dynasty, brainchild of soviet Russia and about to become a large scale example of therapeutic psychodrama.

[silly wabbit]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

Two nations staring each other out is hardly a war never mind a world war

[ruslan111]

Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"?

The Soviet Union crumbled because of the personal efforts of Ronald Reagan and you know it. To claim otherwise is disingenuous.

Even by your own definition, the USSR failed because it was trying to keep up with the Christian efforts of the Reagan Administration, but they failed because they are God-less commies.



YiC,

Zech

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Secretary of the Security Council of the United States:
"We destroyed the Soviet Union, and destroy Russia. The chances that you have no "
- This statement was winged in the West