[Goatski]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Yes, I understood what you were saying, but I still don't know what overall point you were trying to make?

That you were 100% wrong about there being no intelligent force behind the physical form and function of the human male testicle. That your entire argument was based in ignorance and your ego's need to deny your Innermost.

Clearly, there is an intelligence permeating all matter and now you can no longer disagree. Welcome to the objective knowledge club.

You're welcome.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

That you were 100% wrong about there being no intelligent force behind the physical form and function of the human male testicle. That your entire argument was based in ignorance and your ego's need to deny your Innermost.

Nope, it was more based on the fact that the testicles are darn awkward and don't seem intelligently designed. An intelligent designer could, surely, look beyond the flaws you mentioned ie temperature etc, found a way to compensate? The birds seem to have managed it, they aren't extinct from lack of sperm yet.

Clearly, there is an intelligence permeating all matter and now you can no longer disagree. Welcome to the objective knowledge club.

You're welcome.

Uhh... I'm pretty sure I can still disagree.

[Goatski]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Nope, it was more based on the fact that the testicles are darn awkward and don't seem intelligently designed.

I proved that they were intelligently designed. I notice you don't dare attempt to challenge my objective facts. That shows me that you can find no flaw and agree with me 100%.

An intelligent designer could, surely, look beyond the flaws you mentioned ie temperature etc, found a way to compensate?

I never mentioned any flaws. Again, your entire premise was that if creation did not meet your personal ideal specifications, then it must be formed by non-intelligence. That was an idiotic, pig-headed, and extremely egotistical standpoint that you used to have before I set you straight.

"If cars were designed by an intelligent mind then they wouldn't run on air polluting gasoline so I guess that means all gas powered cars were created by blind non-intelligent forces because I personally would have designed it differently." - Ignorant statement you would have made before I showed you the light.

You're welcome.

The birds seem to have managed it, they aren't extinct from lack of sperm yet.

Neither are humans. In fact some say humanity is overpopulated. Check and mate. Oh, and birds don't have a body temperature of 98 degrees nor human semen.

I accept your apology... again.

Uhh... I'm pretty sure I can still disagree.

No, you can't. You can make a fool of yourself, but you can't disagree.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I proved that they were intelligently designed. I notice you don't dare attempt to challenge my objective facts. That shows me that you can find no flaw and agree with me 100%.

Well, someone's a little uppity, aren't they? You didn't prove it at all, you merely stated your reasonings behind your theories. That isn't the same as proving something beyond reasonable doubt. No jury would convict/acquit based on such 'evidence'.

I never mentioned any flaws. Again, your entire premise was that if creation did not meet your personal ideal specifications, then it must be formed by non-intelligence. That was an idiotic, pig-headed, and extremely egotistical standpoint that you used to have before I set you straight.

The only reason I presented it thus was because it seems commonsense. Looking at how inconvenient the testicles are, I merely pondered whether an intelligent designer might consider more conveniently streamlined gonads.

"If cars were designed by an intelligent mind then they wouldn't run on air polluting gasoline so I guess that means all gas powered cars were created by blind non-intelligent forces because I personally would have designed it differently." - Ignorant statement you would have made before I showed you the light.

Cars these days are more designed by greedy people who don't care about the environment. They could very easily come up with something much more environmentally friendly. They simply don't care.

Neither are humans. In fact some say humanity is overpopulated. Check and mate. Oh, and birds don't have a body temperature of 98 degrees nor human semen. old

I accept your apology... again.

*Sigh* You've twisted my words, dangnabbit!

No, you can't. You can make a fool of yourself, but you can't disagree.

I thought I just did.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

So....uh...what exactly is your point? Logic would have it that you have a point stashed in there somewhere, but what is it, exactly?

His point is your logic is faulty because it is based on your opinion. You personally find it illogical for the male anatomy to be easily harmed, therefore based on your opinion, you claim that it isn't intelligently designed.

His example with the pen is basically a long winded analogy, saying that since its not the way you'd do it, then its not intelligent. But that's arrogant, and assumes that you know the only intelligent way, perhaps it is that way for a reason you didn't think of.

That was his point.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

How else does one theorize if not working on personal theories? And I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that the gonads aren't the best design ever.
And it wasn't only my opinion, I was also going by facts.
Fact-If a male gets kicked in the balls-extreme pain. Not even kicked, for some guys, even a somewhat gentle prod will do it.
Are you saying that's not inconvenient? Maybe not if you're into pain.

[Goatski]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

How else does one theorize if not working on personal theories? And I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that the gonads aren't the best design ever.
And it wasn't only my opinion, I was also going by facts.
Fact-If a male gets kicked in the balls-extreme pain. Not even kicked, for some guys, even a somewhat gentle prod will do it.
Are you saying that's not inconvenient? Maybe not if you're into pain.

You seem to be under the impression that men are constantly being punched in the gonads or bumping their gonads into something every other second. 22 years and I've never been punched in the nuts or bumped into anything hard enough to cause "extreme pain". Billions of men go about their daily lives and die of old age with intact gonads. Billions of men live out their day to day lives without having a blunt force applied to their gonads. Not that you would have any frame of reference to know if such "extreme pain" is even all that "extreme". Hint: It's not.

If you would go back to my original post and give me step by step counter arguments I could further explain the nature of objective reality to you. As it stands you will not do that because you know I am 100% right and that you are 100% wrong. I'm figuring you don't dare try attack my objective, impersonal, and higher logic because I've shown you the light (You're wlecome), but your egos don't wish to fully immerse themselves in frailty of their miserably weak arguments.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Billions of men go about their daily lives and die of old age with intact gonads. Billions of men live out their day to day lives without having a blunt force applied to their gonads.

Yes, but that's because billions of men have the good luck to live out their entire lives without coming into contact with Rachael Van Nutmunching.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

How else does one theorize if not working on personal theories? And I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that the gonads aren't the best design ever.
And it wasn't only my opinion, I was also going by facts.
Fact-If a male gets kicked in the balls-extreme pain. Not even kicked, for some guys, even a somewhat gentle prod will do it.
Are you saying that's not inconvenient? Maybe not if you're into pain.

Btw I apologize if I seemed harsh or anything that was not my opinion, I was just explaining how I interpreted his statements.

Anyways, certainly thats an incovenience, yet I am willing to trade that off for the sensory abilities in that area. I'm not getting hit there all the time, heck in my entire life I've been hit there a total of two times. And I take martial arts I might add, meaning I'm more likely to get hit there (and anywhere else for that matter) than people who don't.