[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

Can you prove us that you really saw that beast? Do you have any pictures?..

I do. Did you even bother reading the rest of this thread?

Brother, I found THIS horrific website. Goodness, people have often seen these creatures!!

And HERE is a news article!

They're everywhere! Yet the Darwinist agenda has conditioned the public to label anybody who sees one a "nut" or a "hallucinator." Same goes for the many credible witnesses to livng plesiosaurs and dinosaurs.

That bigfoot stuff is nonsense, though. Humans didn't evolve from apes, so why would there be a "missing link" between us?

[15.3IQ (On Moderation)]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

i dont think you guys are using much logic in this....do you know how much food a bird like that would have to eat? or the nest it would have, with the babies it would have, and then feed them, also it would have to have a mate....you guys are not being logical you are not thinking about this with your brains....

both of those sites say many times that its a pseudo science. CRYPTOZOOLOGY....is the study of mythical creatures...the same reason that a bird of that size couldnt exist in a state that is mostly desert is the same reason that the loch ness monster cant live in loch ness....there is simply not enough food and room for them to have stayed so well hidden for so long.

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

i dont think you guys are using much logic in this....do you know how much food a bird like that would have to eat? or the nest it would have, with the babies it would have, and then feed them, also it would have to have a mate....you guys are not being logical you are not thinking about this with your brains....

both of those sites say many times that its a pseudo science. CRYPTOZOOLOGY....is the study of mythical creatures...the same reason that a bird of that size couldnt exist in a state that is mostly desert is the same reason that the loch ness monster cant live in loch ness....there is simply not enough food and room for them to have stayed so well hidden for so long.

Are you so sure? Did God come down from his kingdom and tell you all these things? Last year, scientists catalogued several new species of insect and animals. How could they have done this, if God hadn't isolated and hidden certain things from his creations? You really do need to pick up a book some time.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

i dont think you guys are using much logic in this....do you know how much food a bird like that would have to eat? or the nest it would have, with the babies it would have, and then feed them, also it would have to have a mate....you guys are not being logical you are not thinking about this with your brains....

Of course not. The Bible clearly states that people think with their hearts:
Proverbs 23:7 For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee.
Matthew 9:4 And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts?

Nowhere in the Bible does it mention thinking with your brain.
Friend, have you ever heard of the coelacanth? Until very recently, secular scientists thought they had all died out in the flood. Now it turns out they're still alive. What does that teach you?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

I don't usually mention this, but I do have some photographic evidence of pterodactyls existing fairly recently. This photo was taken by my great grandfather, a General Chaplain in the confederate army. I hope this quells any further doubt.

[Wibralover]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

I don't usually mention this, but I do have some photographic evidence of pterodactyls existing fairly recently. This photo was taken by my great grandfather, a General Chaplain in the confederate army. I hope this quells any further doubt.

So if a child is bottle fed, it's not a mammal?

A child (human) IS a mammal, because that child first had breast-feeding. And that is suckling..

Kangaroos suckle their mother for food, etc. Are they mammals?

*smashes his head on the wall* Yes it is a mammal, because the little kangeroos suckle their mothers for food..

You don't even understand your own mythology. Even if we accept your evil-utionist doctrine that all dinosaurs were reptiles, that does not mean that all reptiles were dinosaurs. One could just as easily say the following:

You you couldn't. A turtle IS a reptile, but it isn't a dinosaur. They are part of the order of the "testudinoidea" (trutles), "dinosaur" is a generic name for the "Ornitishia" (herbivores, like: Stegosaurus, Iguanodon, etc..) and the "Saurischia" (herbivores, like: Diplodocus, Brachiosaurus. carnivores, like: T-rex, Allosaurus, Velociraptor...) "testudinoidea" aren't part of those two, they are an individual order.

[Brother V]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

A child (human) IS a mammal, because that child first had breast-feeding. And that is suckling..





*smashes his head on the wall* Yes it is a mammal, because the little kangeroos suckle their mothers for food..





You you couldn't. A turtle IS a reptile, but it isn't a dinosaur. They are part of the order of the "testudinoidea" (trutles), "dinosaur" is a generic name for the "Ornitishia" (herbivores, like: Stegosaurus, Iguanodon, etc..) and the "Saurischia" (herbivores, like: Diplodocus, Brachiosaurus. carnivores, like: T-rex, Allosaurus, Velociraptor...) "testudinoidea" aren't part of those two, they are an individual order.

What if a child never breast fed, and only bottle fed from it's birth. Would it still be a mammal?


V

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

You you couldn't. A turtle IS a reptile, but it isn't a dinosaur. They are part of the order of the "testudinoidea" (trutles), "dinosaur" is a generic name for the "Ornitishia" (herbivores, like: Stegosaurus, Iguanodon, etc..) and the "Saurischia" (herbivores, like: Diplodocus, Brachiosaurus. carnivores, like: T-rex, Allosaurus, Velociraptor...) "testudinoidea" aren't part of those two, they are an individual order.

I recently read a study that says the dinosaurs were in fact warm blooded, and not reptiles at all. Sounds to be like too many conflicting THEORIES...

[Pastor Rune Enoe]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

Friend, have you ever heard of the coelacanth? Until very recently, secular scientists thought they had all died out in the flood. Now it turns out they're still alive. What does that teach you?

Is there no limit to the stupidity of secular scientists? First they claim that plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, ichthyosaurs and coelacanths drowned during the Flood. And once they find out that fish can't drown, they call the coelacanth a Lazarus taxon as if they had resurrected the animal, like Jesus resurrected Lazarus.

I recently read a study that says the dinosaurs were in fact warm blooded, and not reptiles at all. Sounds to be like too many conflicting THEORIES...

And sometimes they claim dinosaurs where covered by feathers - like flaming homers (which is probably the real reason they died out).

But I wonder how the scientists will explain this stegosaur in ancient Cambodian temple.

[OnYourKnees]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

i dont think you guys are using much logic in this....do you know how much food a bird like that would have to eat? or the nest it would have, with the babies it would have, and then feed them, also it would have to have a mate....you guys are not being logical you are not thinking about this with your brains....

both of those sites say many times that its a pseudo science. CRYPTOZOOLOGY....is the study of mythical creatures...the same reason that a bird of that size couldnt exist in a state that is mostly desert is the same reason that the loch ness monster cant live in loch ness....there is simply not enough food and room for them to have stayed so well hidden for so long.

Don't know much about Texas, do you, boy?

http://www.texasalmanac.com/environment/

(Size, water resources, climate regions. It's far from all being desert.)

Texas is HUGE, at 268,500 square miles. It's bigger than the entire country of France (260,558 square miles). Unlike France, most of it is unpopulated. This map indicates how much of it has fewer than one person per square mile!



By comparison, your imaginary country Belgium, were it real, would be only 12,672 square miles. A WEEE corner of Texas.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

Don't know much about Texas, do you, boy?

http://www.texasalmanac.com/environment/

(Size, water resources, climate regions. It's far from all being desert.)

Texas is HUGE, at 268,500 square miles. It's bigger than the entire country of France (260,558 square miles). Unlike France, most of it is unpopulated.

Also unlike France, most of the citizens are heterosexual, and some have even been known to do an honest day's work.

[Pastor Rune Enoe]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

By comparison, your imaginary country Belgium, were it real, .....

The plot thickens, The site "Belgium Doesn't Exist" seems to be down at the moment - probably taken down by anti-Christian hackers.

But you can still buy your bumperstickers here.

[the dud]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

Is there no limit to the stupidity of secular scientists? First they claim that plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, ichthyosaurs and coelacanths drowned during the Flood.

A coelacanth is a fish, can you explain me how you drown a fish?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

A coelacanth is a fish, can you explain me how you drown a fish?

That's exactly the point - you can't, and that is why coelacanths and pterosaurs are still around. The only people who think that fish drowned during the flood are the evilutionists. See how much more sense we make?

[the dud]

Re: I saw a pterosaur today!

That's exactly the point - you can't, and that is why coelacanths and pterosaurs are still around. The only people who think that fish drowned during the flood are the evilutionists. See how much more sense we make?

1: I am an evolutionist.
2: Evolutionists don't believe in the "flood".