[Damien Cross]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

From this article:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...e-species.html



Quite the clever little ant, eh?


The animal kingdom gets it!

So there you go.
Here you are takling about how important you men are in the role of propagating the species.....EVOLUTION of these ants shows that hey, males might not even be necessary in many years to come!

So next time you ask us to fetch you a beer or a sandwich, just think, if all the women in the world were one day to revolt.....you all could be replaced with a petrie dish.

Although I, personally, wouldn't really like to see men go....I rather like the services a man's able to perform....though don't quote me on that

Wi dar be a lezbe'n up n here? N a man hatr to? I's bet shi be won a dem dat be eat'n bull balls and pinisis wit hotdog buns. N she be kik'n lil boys n de balls fo da hel o it.

Yu's is NASTY. NASTY wuman!!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

[...]Vienneau isn't too terribly common a surname either, but I'm will to bet I have no relation to the majority of Vienneaus out there.

True, they probably disowned you.

PS shouldn't it be "Vienneaux"?

[WickedWitch]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I concur. I doubt any girl would presently want to wash Onion's underwear anyway.

Most heartily agreed.

No, but most people called Van Helsing probably are. One is a common name, the other isn't. Why do you always insist on being wrong about everything?

Vienneau isn't too terribly common a surname either, but I'm will to bet I have no relation to the majority of Vienneaus out there.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

What's ridiculous is the fact that you call this man her granddaddy just because of the name. Is everyone called 'Smith' related?

No, but most people called Van Helsing probably are. One is a common name, the other isn't. Why do you always insist on being wrong about everything?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I concur. I doubt any girl would presently want to wash Onion's underwear anyway.

[WickedWitch]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Not I.

[LITTLEONION]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I know I would miss you gals. Who would wash my underpants,and still love me afterwords?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I'm starting to think the entire forum should be a men-only zone. We wouldn't be losing much.

Oh, you'd miss us. You know you would.

You call the Holocaust ridiculous? You think the deaths of up to 100 Jews is something to "lol" at? You pagan supremacists really are full of hate, aren't you?

Not at all.
What's ridiculous is the fact that you call this man her granddaddy just because of the name. Is everyone called 'Smith' related?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Are you suggesting that the women are winning this argument?

No, I'm suggesting that women create unnecessary arguments where only peace and harmony would exist otherwise.

We are. That's probably because your defective Y chromosomes are preventing you from providing proper support for your arguments against your extinction.

Just like your defective man-parts prevent you from having a proper defence against getting slapped in the face, eh?

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

No, we won't. And that's because there isn't going to be a Rapture.

Care to prove it?

[WickedWitch]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Are you suggesting that the women are winning this argument?

We are. That's probably because your defective Y chromosomes are preventing you from providing proper support for your arguments against your extinction.

That's just sick-ularist silly talk. Long before then, we'll have been raptured, and the end of all things will have come. Of course, by "we" I mean the first-person plural exclusive rather than the first-person plural inclusive; no one expects either you or Mrs. Van Hellbound to be raptured.

No, we won't. And that's because there isn't going to be a Rapture.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

But don't worry boys, your extinction will take quite a while: estimates indicate you'll be here to be a pain in our asses for another 100,000 years or so.

That's just sick-ularist silly talk. Long before then, we'll have been raptured, and the end of all things will have come. Of course, by "we" I mean the first-person plural exclusive rather than the first-person plural inclusive; no one expects either you or Mrs. Van Hellbound to be raptured.

[Nobar King]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I'm starting to think the entire forum should be a men-only zone. We wouldn't be losing much.

Are you suggesting that the women are winning this argument?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I'm starting to think the entire forum should be a men-only zone. We wouldn't be losing much.

That's just ridiculous.....

You call the Holocaust ridiculous? You think the deaths of up to 100 Jews is something to "lol" at? You pagan supremacists really are full of hate, aren't you?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

You don't scare me, woman.

I wasn't trying to.