[Nobar King]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

You don't scare me, woman.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Bla, bla, bla, did I miss something?

What a meaningful contribution to my thread. Sir, I am in awe. If I wore a hat, I'd take it off to you. Why haven't you won a nobel prize yet? Surely Einstein himself could not compare to you!

[John Bois Ward]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

These so-called all female species of ants and lizards are typical hoaxes created by atheistic scientists. Like Piltdown Man and the earth being older than 10,000 years, these fantasies were created to lead astray the feeble minded (children, women, mentally retarded, etc). Simple logic demonstrates that an all female species is a fallacy.

As seen in Genesis 7:2 -Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female - the male possesses the female. In other words, the female is a possession and the male is a possessor. You cannot have a possession without a possessor; therefore, you cannot have a female without a male.

We have - logic
You have - a woman's brain

We win.

[Nobar King]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Bla, bla, bla, did I miss something?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

And ants aren't the only creatures to have done away with males. There are some kinds of lizards, for example, who have no males in their species, too: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/3499/212

And, there's evidence to suggest that human males are slowly going extinct, as well. The Y chromosome used to carry much more genetic material thousands of years ago than it does today; the X chromosome, however, is still just as strong as it was. And there are fewer boys being born than girls. And since, thanks to new developments in science using bone marrow to create gametes (allowing women to create their own sperm and thus to reproduce), we won't really be needing you people (i.e. men) very much longer. True, your services will be missed, but given that you are all a nuisance to society and the driving force behind the death of this planet, you yourselves certainly won't be. But don't worry boys, your extinction will take quite a while: estimates indicate you'll be here to be a pain in our asses for another 100,000 years or so.

*Gasps* Zeke, that was uncalled for!

This wonderful post of Alie's deserves a bump.
See, boys?
The evidence is all against you.

Although I'm sure you'll be missed. Dildos just aren't the same.

I always knew you were some sort of a Pagan Supremacist!

Ladies and gentlemen, here we have Jenny.
Jenny adds 1+1.
As her answer, Jenny gets 72. *snicker*

You can fit a person into a whale's stomach whole. You can NOT fit two people into a wolf's stomach, even chewed up.

And how do you know that was *always* the case? Maybe wolves were bigger back then!

Although the reality of the situation is a person wouldn't survive long in a whale's stomach without the internal acids digesting them. But primitives (like the people who wrote the bible) wouldn't have known this.

[JennyD]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I never said I wanted to get rid of men - only that this proves that men aren't indispensable to racial survival.
So there.

I always knew you were some sort of a Pagan Supremacist!

Once again, both are fairytales. The only difference is that once is openly acknowledged as this, whereas people stubbornly insist on believing the other literally.

You can fit a person into a whale's stomach whole. You can NOT fit two people into a wolf's stomach, even chewed up.

[WickedWitch]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

And ants aren't the only creatures to have done away with males. There are some kinds of lizards, for example, who have no males in their species, too: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/3499/212

And, there's evidence to suggest that human males are slowly going extinct, as well. The Y chromosome used to carry much more genetic material thousands of years ago than it does today; the X chromosome, however, is still just as strong as it was. And there are fewer boys being born than girls. And since, thanks to new developments in science using bone marrow to create gametes (allowing women to create their own sperm and thus to reproduce), we won't really be needing you people (i.e. men) very much longer. True, your services will be missed, but given that you are all a nuisance to society and the driving force behind the death of this planet, you yourselves certainly won't be. But don't worry boys, your extinction will take quite a while: estimates indicate you'll be here to be a pain in our asses for another 100,000 years or so.

Who's going to save you when the spiders come?

*Gasps* Zeke, that was uncalled for!

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Why is that so hard to believe? After all, Jonah managed to survive being eating by a whale and spending 3 days and nights in its stomach. Remember, ALL things are possible through Jesus

Once again, both are fairytales. The only difference is that once is openly acknowledged as this, whereas people stubbornly insist on believing the other literally.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

The bible is a fairytale book. If I believed what it said, I might as well believe that a wolf can swallow and devour two living people who could somehow survive the process and be cut out of its stomach with an ax...

Why is that so hard to believe? After all, Jonah managed to survive being eating by a whale and spending 3 days and nights in its stomach. Remember, ALL things are possible through Jesus

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Who's going to save you when the spiders come?

You fight dirty.........real dirty.....

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I never said I wanted to get rid of men - only that this proves that men aren't indispensable to racial survival.
So there.

Who's going to save you when the spiders come?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

That's a flat-out lie. Ants are tiny little things. Have you ever seen an ant's tallywhacker? I certainly haven't. Therefore, it's just guesswork as to whether they're male or female. This scientist probably just looked at a bunch of ants, decided they were all female because they were too small to tell, and then decided that proved her theory. She may have supported it by dressing up some of the ants in lipstick and tiny ant high heels, thus adding to her damnation by causing the poor helpless male ants to deviate from God's Blessed Gender Roles.

Have you seen a microscope? With those you can see things invisble to the naked eye - such as bacteria and individual blood cells. With such a device, viewing an ant tallywhacker is something very easy to do. Not that one would make a habit of it, you perverted man...

And the fact that her grandaddy was the greatest mass murderer of all time, a vicious killer who may have been responsible for the deaths of up to 100 Jews. She's just carrying on his anti-Christian mission.

! That's just ridiculous.....

Yes harlot, after all without men were would you get the babies you need to eat to keep Satan happy. You can't get babies out of petre dish.

How do you think test tube babies are made? Well, they might not be in a petrie dish, but close enough...

Mrs. Van Harlot, the Bible repeatedly says that God created woman for man, not the other way around.

The bible is a fairytale book. If I believed what it said, I might as well believe that a wolf can swallow and devour two living people who could somehow survive the process and be cut out of its stomach with an ax...

On our side - God's Word
On your side - evil-utionist feminazi nonsense.

Suits me.

We win.

No, you don't.

Then again, if you aspire to be like an ant, that says so much about you.

I never said I wanted to get rid of men - only that this proves that men aren't indispensable to racial survival.
So there.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

AMEN SISTER!

[Sixtha (Quarantined)]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

On our side - God's Word
On your side - evil-utionist feminazi nonsense.

We win.

That is probably the best thing I've read on the whole internet.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

The above I posted isn't just speculation, it's pure fact. Anyone can go observe these ants and see for themselves that there are no males in the colonies.

That's a flat-out lie. Ants are tiny little things. Have you ever seen an ant's tallywhacker? I certainly haven't. Therefore, it's just guesswork as to whether they're male or female. This scientist probably just looked at a bunch of ants, decided they were all female because they were too small to tell, and then decided that proved her theory. She may have supported it by dressing up some of the ants in lipstick and tiny ant high heels, thus adding to her damnation by causing the poor helpless male ants to deviate from God's Blessed Gender Roles.

Anna Himler, "scientist":


Note the deviant, lying eyes.

And the fact that her grandaddy was the greatest mass murderer of all time, a vicious killer who may have been responsible for the deaths of up to 100 Jews. She's just carrying on his anti-Christian mission.