[Meek and Humble]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Umm...could you make a little more sense? Sorry.

She's saying that if women were not dependent on men, you would have a chance of surviving, since you obviously do not and will never have any man.

And you said I wasn't familiar with sarcasm...

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Heheheheh...I see you're grasping at straws now.
But hey, I did say I would miss men if they were to go....I don't want there to be no men...my point being that males are not indispensable.

Yes harlot, after all without men were would you get the babies you need to eat to keep Satan happy. You can't get babies out of petre dish.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Mrs. Van Harlot, the Bible repeatedly says that God created woman for man, not the other way around.

On our side - God's Word
On your side - evil-utionist feminazi nonsense.

We win.

Then again, if you aspire to be like an ant, that says so much about you.

[Dr. Zaius]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

The thing about the lesbian amazon ant colony, I just don't believe it. It's probably just some feminist propaganda or something stupid from one of those satirical papers.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

...
So next time you ask us to fetch you a beer or a sandwich, just think, if all the women in the world were one day to revolt.....you all could be replaced with a petrie dish.
...

The closest thing that women have done for an open "revolt" is burn a bunch of bras in the 1960's. For my part I cheered them on, and in the process thanking God that He didn't endow them with enough mental capacity to go much beyond that.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

So, Rachel van Horndog, if men are not essential, does that mean you have a chance?

Umm...could you make a little more sense? Sorry.

[JennyD]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

So, Rachel van Horndog, if men are not essential, does that mean you have a chance?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Anna Himler, "scientist":


Note the deviant, lying eyes.

On my side - photographic proof.
Your side - groupthink.

Nice argument. Reeeaaall compelling.

Oh yeah, she "might be" lying because of her eyes.
'Nuff Said.

Teehee... well said.

HB - I take it you aren't familiar with sarcasm?

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Amen, Sister Sixtha!

[Sixtha (Quarantined)]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Oh yeah, she "might be" lying because of her eyes.
'Nuff Said.

[John Bois Ward]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Anna Himler, "scientist":


Note the deviant, lying eyes.

On my side - photographic proof.
Your side - groupthink.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

This would only be of significance if evolution were actually real...

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I find this highly suspect considering the “scientist” is a woman and most likely a lesbian. As a result, her objectivity must by questioned because she had no intention of finding any males.

On your side - malicious speculation.
On my side - fact.

Sorry, but I win.

[John Bois Ward]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Reproduction without sex is fairly common in the ant world, but the Mycocepurus smithii is the first known to have dispensed with males altogether.
The phenomenon takes the stress out of finding a mate and may help keep the peace in colonies, the scientists believe.
They were first drawn to Mycocepurus smithii by its skill at cultivating various different fungal crops for food. Closer inspection raised questions about the ants' sex life, or lack of it.
Anna Himler, of the University of Arizona, said: 'When we started to study this species more closely, we just weren't finding any males.

I find this highly suspect considering the “scientist” is a woman and most likely a lesbian. As a result, her objectivity must by questioned because she had no intention of finding any males.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

You can't cuddle up to a petrie dish, can you, harlot?

Heheheheh...I see you're grasping at straws now.
But hey, I did say I would miss men if they were to go....I don't want there to be no men...my point being that males are not indispensable.

If there weren't any men left, who would you cook and clean for?

Gee, I don't know, myself?