Religion and Science....uh oh!

[Zeldafan]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

Who is he? Are you referring to Jesus?

...Who is who? Lol, "dude"?

I'm referring to the poster I was responding to.


Ezekial, what sort of example do you want? How my hope will happen? I have no clue It's just a hope.

[Nobar King]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

There's always hope dude

Who is he? Are you referring to Jesus?

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

In the face of all Godly reason, I'm going to ask, "Give me an example of what you propose."

[Zeldafan]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

Kansas has tried this more times than I care to remember and those Godless Heathens in Washington just oppose everything and send their expensive joo lawyers down to force their communist ways on God Fearing people!

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

Just because Kansas can't do it, doesn't mean we can't! There's always hope dude, trust me.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

[...] All I'm saying is maybe science and religion can hopefully be united. Nothing wrong with having hope!

Kansas has tried this more times than I care to remember and those Godless Heathens in Washington just oppose everything and send their expensive joo lawyers down to force their communist ways on God Fearing people!

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

[Zeldafan]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

Once so-called "scientists" realize that all the physical laws they discover are the creation of God's brilliant design, and begin to use their process of discovery for His glory instead of their own, then your stated goal will be achieved.

Until then, all they will do is condemn themselves and their followers to an eternity of torture in the Lake of Fire.

Well, maybe. I didn't necessarily mean that though. But if that's how it turns out that works too!

[JennyD]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

What's wrong with being clever?

All I'm saying is maybe science and religion can hopefully be united. Nothing wrong with having hope!

Once so-called "scientists" realize that all the physical laws they discover are the creation of God's brilliant design, and begin to use their process of discovery for His glory instead of their own, then your stated goal will be achieved.

Until then, all they will do is condemn themselves and their followers to an eternity of torture in the Lake of Fire.

[Zeldafan]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

What's wrong with being clever?

All I'm saying is maybe science and religion can hopefully be united. Nothing wrong with having hope!

[Bob4God]

Re: Religion and Science....uh oh!

So you're trying to be clever and say that in one thousand years our most cherished religious beliefs will be viewed as ludricous and unfounded?

Well I've got news for you, GOD is very real and things like science, magic and gravity are the works of satan!

[Zeldafan]

Long has there been a huge debate with science vs. religion. And long has there been unneeded struggle and arguing to "prove" who is "right". A thought crossed my mind the other day...what if religion and science are one in the same?

Think of it this way...during medieval times things that were unexplainable (e.g. gravity, chemical reactions, even weather) were defined as "magic". They did not have the technology to explain how this happened, so one way or another they worked it into magic, or religion.

Nowadays, we have the same thing. We can't explain a lot of things still (e.g. gravity still lol, time, space, etc...). So, eventually down the road when science has evolved enough that we CAN explain nearly everything, we will then define what is "magic" as scientific fact.

Basically what I'm trying to say..."magic" 1000 years ago is our science today. So maybe 1000 years from now, our "magic" today will be their science.

Anyone agree/disagree? Let me know!