Further proof of a young Earth.

[Wash O'Hanley]

Ok folks, stay with me. The below is not my original work, it was sent to me by a very intelligent mother of 15 from Oklahoma in a chain e-mail.

For this Experiment you will need: a Bible, one brand new sheet of paper, bowl full of water, hair dryer, blue,yellow, gray, and brown crayons, a lighter, and a pen

Look at the sheet of paper, note that it is brand new.
Step 1: Open Bible to Gen 1 and read verses 1-5
Step 2: Using pen draw a circle on the sheet of paper and label it earth
Step 3: read Gen 1:6-13
Step 4: using crayons draw clouds, water, land, grass, plants, and trees
Step 5: Read Gen 1:14-19
Step 6: Using crayons draw the sun, moon, and stars
Step 7: read Gen 1:20-23
Step 8: Using the pen draw fish in the water and birds in the air
Step 9: Read Gen 1:24-31
Step 10: Using pen draw cows, spiders, and a cat or dog. Then draw two people and label them Adam and Eve.
Step 11: Sit back and look at picture. See how wonderful and perfect it looks?
Step 12: Read Gen 3
Step 13: Using pen draw a snake
SIN has entered the world

Step 14: Crumple your picture and straighten it back out. Do this 10 times. It doesnt look so brand new now does it?

Step 15: Read Gen 6&7
Step 16: Throw picture into bowl of water, crumple and straighten it out
Step 17: Read Gen 8:1-14
Step 18: Using hair dryer, dry your picture compleatly. Your picture is looking a little worse for wear.
Step 19: repeat step 14
Step 20: Using lighter burn hole in middle of picture and quickly put it out.
(I SAID THE PAPER NOT THE HOUSE!!! call fire dept! )
Step 21: Repeat step 14

WOW!! Your picture doesnt look new anymore. Its only a few minutes old!!! But because of it being crumpled and straightend, drenched in water, being blow dried, and set on fire, your drawing looks like it could be 100 years old.

God created the Earth 6,000 years ago. But because of SIN, a flood, earthquakes, and volcanoes it only LOOKS 4.5 Billion years old.

Now look at your Bible. Look at how new it is. Did you know that the words of the New Testament are about 2,000 years old? The Old Testament is even older than that! How cool is that? God can take something so old and make it brand new!

God is so Wonderful! He sent his only Son Jesus Christ to die for our sins so we could be made new again. Have you recieved Jesus Christ as your Savior? if you havent please do so today.

[Atheist are evil]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

Amen to that dear brother.


It's sad how those fool Evilutionist, Darwin followers don't see that even fossil records show the GLORY OF OUR LORD, as the fish drawn first, making them the fall to the bottom of the ocean.

[F. Nietzsche]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

Problem:

This does not account for radioisotopic decay measurement mechanisms that indicate the Earth is significantly older, it also does not explain the lack of consistency between Earth geology as we observe it and the concept of a flood. It also fails to explain the fossil record to the same satisfaction that modern palentology does as in a flood scenario, objects would be sorted by weight, which is not consistent with geological fact.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

Problem:

This does not account for radioisotopic decay measurement mechanisms that indicate the Earth is significantly older, it also does not explain the lack of consistency between Earth geology as we observe it and the concept of a flood. It also fails to explain the fossil record to the same satisfaction that modern palentology does as in a flood scenario, objects would be sorted by weight, which is not consistent with geological fact.

Radio decay is another scientifical lie.

Now, can you explain your lack of Salvation(r)?

[Hank]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

Problem:

This does not account for radioisotopic decay measurement mechanisms that indicate the Earth is significantly older, it also does not explain the lack of consistency between Earth geology as we observe it and the concept of a flood. It also fails to explain the fossil record to the same satisfaction that modern palentology does as in a flood scenario, objects would be sorted by weight, which is not consistent with geological fact.

You cant disprove the above points so you resort to changing the subject and name calling. How childish.

[Keith]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

6000 years does seem it bit short

from living in caves and the discovery of fire to Nuclear bombs in that short time

they are not counting it right

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

6000 years does seem it bit short

from living in caves and the discovery of fire to Nuclear bombs in that short time

they are not counting it right

Do you think that you know more than God?

This is a Christian forum. Why are you here?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

6000 years does seem it bit short

from living in caves and the discovery of fire to Nuclear bombs in that short time

they are not counting it right

Easy, Our Loving Savior guided us and gave us the inspiration to make Nuklear weapons friends. All things are possible threw Christ.

[F. Nietzsche]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

Radio decay is another scientifical lie.



Now, can you explain your lack of Salvation®?

Actually, yes.

The video made a number of errors. Not least of which, was the notion that lead ore occurs in uranium ore without origination with the uranium. While geology is by no means something I deem myself especially well informed in, the structure of Uraninite, the most common Uranium bearing ore, is structurally, as to be expected, made up of uranium dioxide, but also contains trace elements of thorium and lead, as would be expected from radioactive decay, trapped in pockets wthin the ore itself, as well as oxygen released in trace amounts.

The notion that sedimentary rocks cannot be radiometrically dated is also silly. Crystals found in some deposits do contain radioactive materials that allow for dating, even if the calcum carbonate or whatever else the rock itself is based off of does not.

You cant disprove the above points so you resort to changing the subject and name calling. How childish.

I'm neither changing the subject or calling names.

[queercoon]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

You cant disprove the above points so you resort to changing the subject and name calling. How childish.

Um did i miss something. He didnt call anybody any names

[Hank]

Re: Further proof of a young Earth.

Um did i miss something. He didnt call anybody any names

What would you know you filthy rotten scum of the eart faggot

Enjoy hell! I'll be the one in Heaven laughing as you scream in agony for all eternity as you burn in the lake of fire and the demons are sodomizing you with their pitchforks!