X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    All the atoms of the universe were packed in a very small but heavy ball.
    The strings (components of powers and atoms) of powers like gravity,... were all the same. Then suddenly the pressure got so immense high that it exploded and that the shrapnel formed the stars and planets,...
    Erm..... What created The Atoms?
    Where did the energy come from?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    So, what caused "The Big Bang?" That you guys Theorise about?
    Surely it just didn't happen from "nothing?"
    After all, that would be impossible. Wouldn't it?
    All the atoms of the universe were packed in a very small but heavy ball.
    The strings (components of powers and atoms) of powers like gravity,... were all the same. Then suddenly the pressure got so immense high that it exploded and that the shrapnel formed the stars and planets,...

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Peter View Post
    So you are telling that one of the sons of the first people alive got there wife somewhere else?
    They just appeared out of nothing? Now THAT'S ridicoulous. Honest, do you actually believe that nonsense?
    So, what caused "The Big Bang?" That you guys Theorise about?
    Surely it just didn't happen from "nothing?"
    After all, that would be impossible. Wouldn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    As in: the land of.


    Have you ever actually read the Bible friend? Every Christian I knows the answer to that. Even my nigra servant's slow-witted 8 year old knows that Cain went into the land of Nod and got a wife.
    So you are telling that one of the sons of the first people alive got there wife somewhere else?
    They just appeared out of nothing? Now THAT'S ridicoulous. Honest, do you actually believe that nonsense?

    Leave a comment:


  • Goatski
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    So Cain is an allegory for what? Having a child?
    Evil people submerged in their own ego governed by self-will which leads to suffering.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Goetien View Post
    That's just another spelling of Abrahim. You should get out more.

    Continue reading that passage. It explains it all. Adam's children, Cain and Seth, are also allegories as well as their sons, both named "Enoch".
    So Cain is an allegory for what? Having a child?

    Leave a comment:


  • Goatski
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    So you think Abraham being called Abraham is an allegory for him being called Ibrahim?
    That's just another spelling of Abrahim. You should get out more.

    Continue reading that passage. It explains it all. Adam's children, Cain and Seth, are also allegories as well as their sons, both named "Enoch".

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Goetien View Post
    Incorrect, sir.

    Example: Ibrahim's children are allegory for the humanoids of flesh bodies who wallow in sin and the men of spirit bodies who do not sin.

    Galatians 4:
    [21] Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
    [22] For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
    [23] But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
    [24] Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
    So you think Abraham being called Abraham is an allegory for him being called Ibrahim?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Boy, you sound about as empty-headed as a girl. You claim Jesus was a "magician of the white lodge", and now you want us to do some "Vulcan forge" ritual? Do you get all of your idiotic material from old TV shows?

    All you need is Jesus, nancyboy. We are True Christians, and we take the Bible AS READ. Landover Baptist is the ultimate "no spin zone" for God's Holy Word. Maybe if you stopped watching Star Trek reruns in your parent's basement and started worshiping God appropriately you'd sound less like a retard...

    Leave a comment:


  • Goatski
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    There is nothing allegorical about the Bible friend. It is all literal.
    Incorrect, sir.

    Example: Ibrahim's children are allegory for the humanoids of flesh bodies who wallow in sin and the men of spirit bodies who do not sin.

    Galatians 4:
    [21] Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
    [22] For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
    [23] But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
    [24] Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
    [...]
    [28] Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
    [29] But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
    [30] Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
    [31] So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.


    One must free himself from the cages of the mind. One must eliminate the root of sin and work in the Forge of Vulcan to create the bodies of light, the bodies of Spirit. Only then can one be free of sin and only then can one enter the kingdom of heaven.

    The bible is literally overflowing with hidden meaning that only the initiated can understand. This was necessary to protect the knowledge from those who would kill the true believers and knowingly taint the message.

    That is why it is said:

    Matthew 7
    [6] Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

    Perhaps you can now understand the following and similar passages:

    Jeremiah 5
    [21] Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:

    Leave a comment:


  • lilith
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Don't be silly, there was no incest. Have any of you ever heard of "spontaneous generation"? The conditions were right in the Land of Nod for Cain to have a wife, so a wife, who was not his sister, for him spontaneously came into being. For those smarty pants who say "spontaneous generation" is just a second creation of God, so therefor the false scripture of Post-Adamism, no it is not. Spontaneous Generation is a completely natural process documented and proved by Christian Scientists. There reason why no one learns about it is the Evilutionists suppressed to for their wicked monkey man theory.
    Um,BJ? "Spontaneous generation?"

    So....where does it say THAT in de book,then?



    "Wow - you can use the word "sane" on the Landover forum with a straight face? I'm impressed!"
    Takes years of practice,mate!

    Leave a comment:


  • moofy
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Can I get an AMEN brothers?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    Most definitely. God will not be mocked.
    Godly point Pastor Zeke. What do this sinner think,Landover is open mike night at the comedy club?? No! For every cheep laugher they lamely try to scour off The Almighty they will be repaid ten fold in Hell. God, Jesus and the Saints are not a bunch of strait men to be the butt of crude jokes for basement dwelling geeks!!

    We TRUE Christians demand you sinners treat this subject with the dignity it deserves!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by moofy View Post
    Were there cockaroaches in the land of NOD?
    Will there be a moofy in the land of eternal damnation?


    Most definitely. God will not be mocked.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

    Originally posted by Goetien View Post
    Moofy,

    Genesis 1: 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    Genesis 5: 2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

    Adam is all of humanity and not just a singular personage. Eve refers to all the women. Cain and Abel refer to two types of people. The Bible is highly allegorical.

    Genesis 3: 20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
    There is nothing allegorical about the Bible friend. It is all literal.

    Leave a comment:

Working...