[iamyourgod]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

What will these God-hating monkey worshipers think up next? Take a look at THIS pack of lies. Now they say they can look back billions of years to see the day that something formed out of nothing...



Now I ask you, did any of that gibberish make a lick of sense? Of course not! I happen to hold PhD's in 5 different theological specialities, and even I can't make heads or tails of it. I swear they just pull this stuff right out of satan's greasy behind.

Stick with the Bible, brothers and sisters.

you DONT understand because you DONT have a PhD in quantum physics.
I hate you with a passion.

[Nobar King]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Why are you so angry, little boy? What did Jesus ever do to you?

[Elizabeth]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Okay, even I am amazed at THIS latest scientifical "discovery." By amazed, I mean astonished that anyone would take them seriously when they try and tell us that they've discovered a "blob" that's 12 bazillion years old. And then they named it after some chink princess.

Thank God I was washed in Jesus' blood and Saved©. Any True Christian™ knows that "blobs in space" don't exist, but God Almighty up in Heaven sure does!

What's so unbelievable about this? Scientists saw something through a telescope, and are hypothesizing where it came from. Do you think the telescope that allowed scientists to see this blob was made by satan and therefore the things seen through it don't exist? Or do you have a problem with the fact that scientists cannot recreate the universe in a lab and therefore can never know for sure what really happened, so any educated guess is just a bunch of nonsense they "pulled out of their asses"? And since scientists can't entirely prove how the universe began, this means the entire field of science is discredited?

[Meek and Humble]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

And since scientists can't entirely prove how the universe began, this means the entire field of science is discredited?

Yes, yes it does.

[Elizabeth]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

And since scientists can't entirely prove how the universe began, this means the entire field of science is discredited?

Yes, yes it does.

Just because science can't prove one thing that is by it's very nature impossible to prove, that doesn't mean it can't prove anything.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Or do you have a problem with the fact that scientists cannot recreate the universe in a lab and therefore can never know for sure what really happened, so any educated guess is just a bunch of nonsense they "pulled out of their asses"?

Yes. Thank you for explaining why "science" is so totally discredited.

Just because science can't prove one thing that is by it's very nature impossible to prove, that doesn't mean it can't prove anything.

But it is possible to prove! Just read the Bible, it's full of proof! God wouldn't lie to us now would He?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

What's so unbelievable about this? Scientists saw something through a telescope, and are hypothesizing where it came from. Do you think the telescope that allowed scientists to see this blob was made by satan and therefore the things seen through it don't exist? Or do you have a problem with the fact that scientists cannot recreate the universe in a lab and therefore can never know for sure what really happened, so any educated guess is just a bunch of nonsense they "pulled out of their asses"? And since scientists can't entirely prove how the universe began, this means the entire field of science is discredited?

No, we fell secular scientists are so depraved that project their disgusting unnatural practices into their "research". That is why you get all this talk about "probing black holes" or "the big bang" and this obsession with white blobs. How blatant can you get? When we say they pulled this stuff out of their backside we are not speaking metaphorically.

Astronomy is just a stealth way to promote homosexuality. Jesus weeps when He thinks about what astronomers do in their observatories. Why Hitler like astronomy.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

HERE's a good one! The God-hating scientificals have found a new set of monkeybones to worship instead of Jesus!

Fossil Discovery Is Heralded

In what could prove to be a landmark discovery, a leading paleontologist said scientists have dug up the 47 million-year-old fossil of an ancient primate whose features suggest it could be the common ancestor of all later monkeys, apes and humans.

Anthropologists have long believed that humans evolved from ancient ape-like ancestors. Some 50 million years ago, two ape-like groups walked the Earth. One is known as the tarsidae, a precursor of the tarsier, a tiny, large-eyed creature that lives in Asia. Another group is known as the adapidae, a precursor of today's lemurs in Madagascar.

Based on previously limited fossil evidence, one big debate had been whether the tarsidae or adapidae group gave rise to monkeys, apes and humans. The latest discovery bolsters the less common position that our ancient ape-like ancestor was an adapid, the believed precursor of lemurs.

Philip Gingerich, president-elect of the Paleontological Society in the U.S., has co-written a paper that will detail next week the latest fossil discovery in Public Library of Science, a peer-reviewed, online journal.

"This discovery brings a forgotten group into focus as a possible ancestor of higher primates," Mr. Gingerich, a professor of paleontology at the University of Michigan, said in an interview.

The discovery has little bearing on a separate paleontological debate centering on the identity of a common ancestor of chimps and humans, which could have lived about six million years ago and still hasn't been found. That gap in the evolution story is colloquially referred to as the "missing link" controversy. In reality, though, all gaps in the fossil record are technically "missing links" until filled in, and many scientists say the term is meaningless.

Nonetheless, the latest fossil find is likely to ignite further the debate between evolutionists who draw conclusions based on a limited fossil record, and creationists who don't believe that humans, monkeys and apes evolved from a common ancestor.

Scientists won't necessarily agree about the details either. "Lemur advocates will be delighted, but tarsier advocates will be underwhelmed" by the new evidence, says Tim White, a paleontologist at the University of California, Berkeley. "The debate will persist."

The skeleton will be unveiled at New York City's American Museum of Natural History next Tuesday by Mayor Michael Bloomberg and an international team involved in the discovery.

According to Prof. Gingerich, the fossilized remains are of a young female adapid. The skeleton was unearthed by collectors about two years ago and has been kept tightly under wraps since then, in an unusual feat of scientific secrecy.

Prof. Gingerich said he had twice examined the adapid skeleton, which was "a complete, spectacular fossil." The completeness of the preserved skeleton is crucial, because most previously found fossils of ancient primates were small finds, such as teeth and jawbones.

It was found in the Messel Shale Pit, a disused quarry near Frankfurt, Germany. The pit has long been a World Heritage Site and is the source of a number of well-preserved fossils from the middle Eocene epoch, some 50 million years ago.

Prof. Gingerich said several scientists, including Jorn Hurum of Norway's National History Museum, had inspected the fossil with computer tomography scanning, a sophisticated X-ray technique that can provide detailed, cross-sectional views. Dr. Hurum declined to comment.

Although the creature looks like a lemur, there are some distinctive physical differences. Lemurs have a tooth comb (a tooth modified to help groom fur); a grooming claw; and a wet nose. Dr. Gingerich said that the adapid skeleton has neither a grooming claw nor a tooth comb. "We can't say whether it had a wet nose or not," he noted.

Since the fossilized creature found in Germany didn't have features like a tooth comb or grooming claw, it could be argued that it gave rise to monkeys, apes and humans, which don't have these features either.

It's supposed to have a comb?

When will the world wake up to the fact that these scienticians are making this stuff up as they go?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Look at THIS crazy stuff. The secular scientists are now claiming that there are alien worms living inside of meteors.

NASA scientist finds evidence of alien life

Aliens exist, and we have proof.

That astonishingly awesome claim comes from Dr. Richard B. Hoover, an astrobiologist at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, who says he has found conclusive evidence of alien life — fossils of bacteria found in an extremely rare class of meteorite called CI1 carbonaceous chondrites. (There are only nine such meteorites on planet Earth.) Hoover’s findings were published late Friday night in the Journal of Cosmology, a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

“I interpret it as indicating that life is more broadly distributed than restricted strictly to the planet earth,” Hoover, who has spent more than 10 years studying meteorites around the world, told FoxNews.com in an interview. “This field of study has just barely been touched — because quite frankly, a great many scientist would say that this is impossible.”

Hoover discovered the fossils by breaking apart the CI1 meteorite, and analyzing the exposed rock with a scanning-electron microscope and a field emission electron-scanning microscope, which allowed him to detect any fossil remains. What he found were fossils of micro-organisms (pictured below), many of which he says are strikingly similar to those found on our own planet (pictured above).

“The exciting thing is that they are in many cases recognizable and can be associated very closely with the generic species here on earth,” said Hoover. Some of the fossils, however, are quite odd. “There are some that are just very strange and don’t look like anything that I’ve been able to identify, and I’ve shown them to many other experts that have also come up stump.”

In order to satisfy the inevitable hoard of buzz-killing skeptics, Hoover’s study and evidence were made available to his peers in the scientific community in advance of the study’s publications, giving them a chance to thoroughly dissect his findings. Comments from those who decided to sift through the evidence will be published online, alongside the study.

“Given the controversial nature of his discovery, we have invited 100 experts and have issued a general invitation to over 5,000 scientists from the scientific community to review the paper and to offer their critical analysis,” writes Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics scientist Dr. Rudy Schild, who serves as the Journal of Cosmology’s editor-in-chief. “No other paper in the history of science has undergone such a thorough vetting, and never before in the history of science has the scientific community been given the opportunity to critically analyze an important research paper before it is published.”

Needless to say, if Hoover’s conclusions are found to be accurate, the implications for human life will be staggering. Here’s hoping that he’s right.

Update: While the Journal of Cosmology says that “no other paper in the history of science has undergone such a thorough vetting,” some highly respected names in the scientific community are challenging the validity of Cosmology, and the findings of Dr. Hoover.

“[The Journal of Cosmology] isn’t a real science journal at all,” says PZ Meyers in Science Blogs, “but is the ginned-up website of a small group of crank academics obsessed with the idea of Hoyle and Wickramasinghe that life originated in outer space and simply rained down on Earth.”

Even the monkey-worshiping atheists know that this is a steaming pile of lies.

[rocknroll]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Well, it has not been proven that the findings are bull sh*t, so let's just wait and see.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Well, it has not been proven that the findings are bull sh*t, so let's just wait and see.

No let's not. The Bible proves their "findings" are "bullsh*t" as you so ineloquently put it. The HOLY WORD OF GOD tells us that so-called aliens are nothing more than DEMONS!!!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Well, it has not been proven that the findings are bull sh*t, so let's just wait and see.

It seems Lead Gnu Atheist PZ Meyers thinks so.

From the article:

“[The Journal of Cosmology] isn’t a real science journal at all,” says PZ Meyers in Science Blogs, “but is the ginned-up website of a small group of crank academics obsessed with the idea of Hoyle and Wickramasinghe that life originated in outer space and simply rained down on Earth.”

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Well I read all of that with some interest - but not an awful lot of interest: none of the so-called "scientifically literate" contributors wrote anything beyond what a kindergarten teacher might burble to butter the passage of further "scientific enquiry" in their young and malleable charges.

Pastor Ezekiel went out of his way to display full and frank details of recent announcements from the scientific community(sic) - many of which I had followed (including today's announcement of several "earth-like exoplanets") - and I do spend a certain amount of time engaginging with physicists so that I can understand where their heads may be "at" the better to witness to them, should God place such an opportunity before me. I wouldn't want to let Him down.

So I attend lectures regularly where the latest pre-publication research is presented, and these physicists do appreciate my
understanding of what is in their mind EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW I DISAGREE. As a rule, they also have a reasonable
understanding of The Bible WITH WHICH THEY DISAGREE but we come together in a dialogue which I find rather gratifying, and I
acknowledge: it is God's salt upon my lips.
PRAISE HIM

COLOSSIANS 4
3 Withall, praying also for vs, that God would open vnto vs a doore of vtterance, to speake the mystery of Christ, for which I am also in bonds:
4 That I may make it manifest, as I ought to speake.
5 Walke in wisdome toward them that are without, redeeming the time.
6 Let your speech bee alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how yee ought to answere euery man.
©1611

I'm not going to bore everyone by quoting all the rubbish these science posters have stuck up, but from memory there are 2 main areas where they are deficient (in their own subject).

• 1 Space and Time. From the so-called Newtonian perspective, these (separate) dimensions are not as conceived in the relativistic universe. There is updown sideways and forwardbackwards = 3 dimensions where his laws of motion were set forth; time here might be a 4th dimension,

Einstein saw those as a different sort of environment, in which gravity was not treated as a force (cf the Newtonian stuff).

Distance is a sort of illusion. Matter slows things down - as our kindergarten teacher might insinuate - and "dimensions" curl up, yielding different sorts of particles at different times (in the early universe).

____________________________

• 2 The relationship between particles and radiation in the non-local universe. We inhabit a world of cause & effect. Radiation cannot possibly do so (there were a few references to "string theory" and assorted gobbledygooks) and particles are anomalous in this

However the physical laws themselves are not sufficient to uniquely describe the Universe .. .. ..etc.

God knows that & tells us about His unfolding plan

ECCLESIASTES 3
10 I haue seene the trauaile which God hath giuen to the sonnes of men, to be exercised in it.
11 He hath made euery thing beautifull in his time: also hee hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can finde out the worke that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
©1611

God is consistent:

ROMANS 8
22 For wee know that the whole creation groaneth, and trauaileth in paine together vntill now.
23 And not only they, but our selues also which haue the first fruites of the spirit, euen we our selues groane within our selues, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.
24 For wee are saued by hope: but hope that is seene, is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?
©1611

Anticipating secular, Godless "science" and its half-baked theories, He forewarned us:

ABOUT THE NON-LOCAL UNIVERSE:

ECCLESIASTES 3
14 I know that whatsoeuer God doeth, it shalbe for euer: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doth it, that men should feare before him.
15 That which hath beene, is now: and that which is to be, hath alreadie beene, and God requireth that which is past.
©1611

ABOUT EVOLUTION:

ECCLESIASTES 3
16 And moreouer, I sawe vnder the Sunne the place of iudgement, that wickednesse was there; and the place of righteousnesse, that iniquitie was there.
17 I said in mine heart, God shall iudge the righteous and the wicked: for there is a time there, for euery purpose and for euery worke.
18 I said in my heart concerning the estate of the sonnes of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselues are beasts.
19 For that which befalleth the sonnes of men, befalleth beastes, euen one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea they haue all one breath, so that a man hath no preheminence aboue a beast; for all is vanitie.
20 All goe vnto one place, all are of the dust, and all turne to dust againe.
21 Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth vpward; and the spirit of the beast that goeth downeward to the earth?
©1611

Satanic false "cosmology" and its timeshare bedfellow "evolution" may pout and flutter, spruiking their debauch "special" (for today only) — yet two things remain the same:

Their shifting sands: God's unchanging Truth.

EVIDENCE

NEW TESTAMENT

MATTHEW 6:34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of it selfe: sufficient vnto the day is the euill thereof.
©1611

OLD TESTAMENT

ECCLESTIAES 3:22 Wherefore I perceiue that there is nothing better, then that a man should reioyce in his owne workes: for that is his portion; for who shall bring him to see what shalbe after him?
©1611

PROOF

OLD TESTAMENT

ECCLESTIAES 3:13 And also that euery man should eate and drinke, and enioy the good of all his labour: it is the gift of God.
©1611

NEW TESTAMENT

MATTHEW 6
31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eate? or, what shall we drinke? or wherewithall shall wee be clothed?
32 (For after all these things doe the Gentiles seeke): for your heauenly father knoweth that ye haue neede of all these things.
33 But seeke ye first the kingdome of God, and his righteousnesse, and all these things shalbe added vnto you.
©1611

HALLELUJAH!

[María Gálvez-Villalobos]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Well I read all of that with some interest - but not an awful lot of interest: none of the so-called "scientifically literate" contributors wrote anything beyond what a kindergarten teacher might burble to butter the passage of further "scientific enquiry" in their young and malleable charges.

Pastor Ezekiel went out of his way to display full and frank details of recent announcements from the scientific community(sic) - many of which I had followed (including today's announcement of several "earth-like exoplanets") - and I do spend a certain amount of time engaginging with physicists so that I can understand where their heads may be "at" the better to witness to them, should God place such an opportunity before me. I wouldn't want to let Him down.

So I attend lectures regularly where the latest pre-publication research is presented, and these physicists do appreciate my
understanding of what is in their mind EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW I DISAGREE. As a rule, they also have a reasonable
understanding of The Bible WITH WHICH THEY DISAGREE but we come together in a dialogue which I find rather gratifying, and I
acknowledge: it is God's salt upon my lips.
PRAISE HIM

COLOSSIANS 4
3 Withall, praying also for vs, that God would open vnto vs a doore of vtterance, to speake the mystery of Christ, for which I am also in bonds:
4 That I may make it manifest, as I ought to speake.
5 Walke in wisdome toward them that are without, redeeming the time.
6 Let your speech bee alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how yee ought to answere euery man.
©1611

I'm not going to bore everyone by quoting all the rubbish these science posters have stuck up, but from memory there are 2 main areas where they are deficient (in their own subject).

• 1 Space and Time. From the so-called Newtonian perspective, these are not (separate) dimensions as in the relativistic sense. There is updown sideways and forwardbackwards = 3 dimensions where his laws of motion were set forth; time here might be a 4th dimension,

Einstein saw those as a different sort of environment, in which gravity was not treated as a force (cf the Newtonian stuff).

Distance is a sort of illusion. Matter slows things down - as our kindergarten teacher might insinuate - and "dimensions" curl up, yielding different sorts of particles at different times (in the early universe).

____________________________

• 2 The relationship between particles and radiation in the non-local universe. We inhabit a world of cause & effect. Radiation cannot possibly do so (there were a few references to "string theory" and assorted gobbledygooks) and particles are anomalous in this

God knows that & tells us about His unfolding plan

ECCLESIASTES 3
10 I haue seene the trauaile which God hath giuen to the sonnes of men, to be exercised in it.
11 He hath made euery thing beautifull in his time: also hee hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can finde out the worke that God maketh from the beginning to the end.
©1611

God is consistent:

ROMANS 8
22 For wee know that the whole creation groaneth, and trauaileth in paine together vntill now.
23 And not only they, but our selues also which haue the first fruites of the spirit, euen we our selues groane within our selues, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.
24 For wee are saued by hope: but hope that is seene, is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?
©1611

Anticipating secular, Godless "science" and its half-baked theories, He forewarned us:

ABOUT THE NON-LOCAL UNIVERSE:

ECCLESIASTES 3
14 I know that whatsoeuer God doeth, it shalbe for euer: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doth it, that men should feare before him.
15 That which hath beene, is now: and that which is to be, hath alreadie beene, and God requireth that which is past.
©1611

ABOUT EVOLUTION:

ECCLESIASTES 3
16 And moreouer, I sawe vnder the Sunne the place of iudgement, that wickednesse was there; and the place of righteousnesse, that iniquitie was there.
17 I said in mine heart, God shall iudge the righteous and the wicked: for there is a time there, for euery purpose and for euery worke.
18 I said in my heart concerning the estate of the sonnes of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselues are beasts.
19 For that which befalleth the sonnes of men, befalleth beastes, euen one thing befalleth them: as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea they haue all one breath, so that a man hath no preheminence aboue a beast; for all is vanitie.
20 All goe vnto one place, all are of the dust, and all turne to dust againe.
21 Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth vpward; and the spirit of the beast that goeth downeward to the earth?
©1611

Satanic false "cosmology" and its timeshare bedfellow "evolution" may pout and flutter, spruiking their debauch "special" (for today only) — yet two things remain the same:

Their shifting sands: God's unchanging Truth.

EVIDENCE

NEW TESTAMENT

MATTHEW 6:34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of it selfe: sufficient vnto the day is the euill thereof.
©1611

OLD TESTAMENT

ECCLESTIAES 3:22 Wherefore I perceiue that there is nothing better, then that a man should reioyce in his owne workes: for that is his portion; for who shall bring him to see what shalbe after him?
©1611

PROOF

OLD TESTAMENT

ECCLESTIAES 3:13 And also that euery man should eate and drinke, and enioy the good of all his labour: it is the gift of God.
©1611

NEW TESTAMENT

MATTHEW 6
31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eate? or, what shall we drinke? or wherewithall shall wee be clothed?
32 (For after all these things doe the Gentiles seeke): for your heauenly father knoweth that ye haue neede of all these things.
33 But seeke ye first the kingdome of God, and his righteousnesse, and all these things shalbe added vnto you.
©1611

HALLELUJAH!

Wow sister Mizza! I can see you is very clever lady and I'm sure you knows that you are doing but not you think is perhap not so good idea for go at this lectures with ateist peoples that can be dangerous for yousoul and try for corrump you? I think you are very brave cristian lady. I no would can to do that.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Well, none of them have drivers' licences & I got a car so I'm the driver+ they buy the absinthe (for later). There are other lectures (not about science) but they're not in Australia - some of us meet up in other countries, and then they're my guests. They won't come hear my music though. They say I probably insert post hypnotic suggestions in the mixing desk. (I just pretend I didn't hear them say that).