X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Unsaved and Loving It
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    So where did this other universe come from? You just can't explain anything logically without God, can you?
    And as ironic as it may be, you can't explain it logically with him either. The whole "pulling the idea of time and space out of my ass and throwing it together in 6 days, then I'll toss a copul'a little meatbags down there and watch them brutally bash each others heads in for a few millenniums or so" idea... Well, as charming as it might be, it has a flaw or two

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Originally posted by Unsaved and Loving It View Post
    Interesting. The best thing I could speculate about the Big Bang is that before our Universe, there was another Universe. Something caused said prior Universe to collapse, and hence, the super dense particle was formed.
    So where did this other universe come from? You just can't explain anything logically without God, can you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Originally posted by Jooboy View Post
    You have FIVE PhD's? And you're 23 according to your profile. Yeah...

    So unless you got all five of those in like a year each, you would have had to start College at about the young age of...oh...3 to get five by that time. That's just assuming you can possibly get one with in four years, five times. Yeah...
    I was a child prodigy, and I was home schooled until I entered Landover Baptist University at the tender age of 16. Jesus has guided me through every single exam and dissertation. Try not to be too jealous.

    And I do have a birthday coming up (heavy hint to a special Thumpergirl).....




    Originally posted by Unsaved and Faking It View Post
    So is the Koran, and I have an electronic copy of one right in my hard drive. I also saw one in a book shop a few weeks ago, and I assure you it is quite real too. I even held it in my hand. Can't get much more real than that, I assure you.

    Your DOF file told us about this. Your lust for 6 year old girls can be directly tied to your fascination with the moon cult of Allah (may piss be upon him). I urge you to delete that and all the other pornography you have downloaded. Once Biblical law is established in America, its just a matter of time before we start sending God's Special Forces into the slums and cesspools of the eurotrash continent to sort out unsaved scum like you....

    Leave a comment:


  • Unsaved and Loving It
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    The easy answer here is that you are just a complete idiot.
    O rly?
    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    Unlike Pastor Ezekiel who is indeed so learned that he has a Brain the size of a Planet (hypothetically speaking of course)
    Yeah, that would explain the thickness of his head, I see...
    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    The Bible (KJV1611) is very real, I have one here right next to me.
    So is the Koran, and I have an electronic copy of one right in my hard drive. I also saw one in a book shop a few weeks ago, and I assure you it is quite real too. I even held it in my hand. Can't get much more real than that, I assure you.
    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    Unlike your "Theories" which are IMPOSSIBLE to prove.
    So is the idea that God tossed Earth together like a big lump of clay and zapped a couple of humans into an garden that has yet to be found in modern times.
    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    Why do you keep turning your back on God by just finding more and more ridiculous ideas about how everything is Created.
    I guess you could call me somewhat of a... realist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joo
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    What will these God-hating monkey worshipers think up next? Take a look at THIS pack of lies. Now they say they can look back billions of years to see the day that something formed out of nothing...



    Now I ask you, did any of that gibberish make a lick of sense? Of course not! I happen to hold PhD's in 5 different theological specialities, and even I can't make heads or tails of it. I swear they just pull this stuff right out of satan's greasy behind.

    Stick with the Bible, brothers and sisters.
    You have FIVE PhD's? And you're 23 according to your profile. Yeah...

    So unless you got all five of those in like a year each, you would have had to start College at about the young age of...oh...3 to get five by that time. That's just assuming you can possibly get one with in four years, five times. Yeah...

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Originally posted by Unsaved and Loving It View Post
    Scientific Mumbo-Jumbo. Naturally, it'd be next to impossible to prove my theory More Mumbo-Jumbo
    Now children, who can point out to me the flaw in this equation?
    The easy answer here is that you are just a complete idiot.
    Unlike Pastor Ezekiel who is indeed so learned that he has a Brain the size of a Planet (hypothetically speaking of course)

    The Bible (KJV1611) is very real, I have one here right next to me.
    Unlike your "Theories" which are IMPOSSIBLE to prove.

    Why do you keep turning your back on God by just finding more and more ridiculous ideas about how everything is Created.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sister Noddy
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Now I ask you, did any of that gibberish make a lick of sense? Of course not! I happen to hold PhD's in 5 different theological specialities, and even I can't make heads or tails of it.
    hmmm ... BA of Science and Masters of Divinity ... yep it makes a lick to me

    Something caused said prior Universe to collapse, and hence, the super dense particle was formed
    ... interesting, Unsaved, I'm loving this idea ... would not be at all surprised if eventually an hypothesis might be more fully established with this in mind ... I'm particularly interested as well in any new developments in Superstring Theory, specifically Brane Theory ... that's membrane theory ... universe is elastic, floats inside a greater extradimensional singularity ... our membrane gets 'bumped' from time to time by another membrane ... hense another 'big bang' ... you get the gist ---

    Leave a comment:


  • Unsaved and Loving It
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    Interesting. The best thing I could speculate about the Big Bang is that before our Universe, there was another Universe. Something caused said prior Universe to collapse, and hence, the super dense particle was formed. The Big Bang happened, and here we are. Naturally, it'd be next to impossible to prove my theory, but I still think it's a somewhat feasible idea compared to some of the other ones out there.

    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    I happen to hold PhD's in 5 different theological specialities, and even I can't make heads or tails of it.
    Now children, who can point out to me the flaw in this equation?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: The Latests Scientifical Insanity

    The 'lava lamp' theory.....I've heard that before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    started a topic The Latest Scientifical Insanity

    The Latest Scientifical Insanity

    What will these God-hating monkey worshipers think up next? Take a look at THIS pack of lies. Now they say they can look back billions of years to see the day that something formed out of nothing...

    Glimpse of Time Before Big Bang Possible

    It may be possible to glimpse before the supposed beginning of time into the universe prior to the Big Bang, researchers now say.

    Unfortunately, any such picture will always be fuzzy at best due to a kind of "cosmic forgetfulness."

    The Big Bang is often thought as the start of everything, including time, making any questions about what happened during it or beforehand nonsensical. Recently scientists have instead suggested the Big Bang might have just been the explosive beginning of the current era of the universe, hinting at a mysterious past.

    To see how far into history one might gaze, theoretical physicist Martin Bojowald at Pennsylvania State University ran calculations based on loop quantum gravity, one of a number of competing theories seeking to explain how the underlying structure of the universe works.

    Past research suggested the Big Bang was preceded by infinite energies and space-time warping where existing scientific theories break down, making it impossible to peer beforehand. The new findings suggest that although the levels of energy and space-time warping before the Big Bang were both incredibly high, they were finite.

    Scientists could spot clues in the present day of what the cosmos looked like previously. If evidence of the past persisted after the Big Bang, its influence could be spotted in astronomical observations and computational models, Bojowald explained.

    However, Bojowald also figures some knowledge of the past was irrevocably lost. For instance, the sheer size of the present universe would suppress precise knowledge of how the universe changed in size before the Big Bang, he said.

    "It came as a big surprise that some properties of the universe before the Big Bang may have only such a weak influence on current observations that they are practically undetermined," Bojowald said of findings detailed online July 1 in the journal Nature Physics.

    One implication of this "cosmic forgetfulness," as Bojowald calls it, is that history does not repeat itself-the fundamental properties of the current era of the universe are different from the last, Bojowald explained. "It's as if the universe forgot some of its properties and acquired new properties independent of what it had before," he told SPACE.com.

    "The eternal recurrence of absolutely identical universes would seem to be prevented by the apparent existence of an intrinsic cosmic forgetfulness," he added.

    These findings differ from a cyclic model of the cosmos from cosmologist Paul Steinhardt at Princeton and theoretical physicist Neil Turok at Cambridge, which envisions an infinite series of Big Bangs preceding our universe caused by additional membranes or "branes" of reality perpetually colliding and bouncing off each other. Steinhardt said he felt Bojowald's calculations were concrete, but needed further elaboration to include the interplay of different kinds of matter and radiation.

    Cosmologist Carlo Rovelli at the Center of Theoretical Physics in Marseilles, France, found it "remarkable" that the new work could delve past the Big Bang. He added the work had to lead to predictions that could be compared to cosmological observations "in order to become credible."
    Now I ask you, did any of that gibberish make a lick of sense? Of course not! I happen to hold PhD's in 5 different theological specialities, and even I can't make heads or tails of it. I swear they just pull this stuff right out of satan's greasy behind.

    Stick with the Bible, brothers and sisters.
Working...