[Sister Noddy]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

I refer you to my previous crowing celebration.

Yeah yeah Brother T, I saw your previous post ...

Well I am baaaack from church you guys ... the magnificent procession, the pomp and ceremony, the Holy Eucharist ... because we worship God the Father Almighty with sacred music, sacred story, and the sacraments ...



... and today with Eucharistic Prayer C ...

The Lord be with you ... and also with you ...
Lift up your hearts ... we lift them to the Lord ...

God of all power, Ruler of the Universe, you are worthy of glory and praise ... glory to you forever and ever ...

At your command all things came to be; the vast expanse of interstellar space, galaxies, suns, the planets in their courses, and this fragile earth, our island home ... by your will they were created and have their being ...

From the primal elements you brought forth the human race, and blessed us with reason, memory and skill ...

[Brother Temperance]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Okay. You my friend badly badly need some amount of logic. Thats the logic a 2 year old has.
Our brains developed to be more worried about other things. because after worms (which is about as far away on the evolutionary as you can get from us) there are tons and tons of animals the evolved to eventually end up as us. starting with...oh the first mammals about... several hundred million years ago, and before that there was reptiles, and amphibians and fish, then things like the worm. to the rodents, then the monkey family, then the ape. and then the chimp then us. (thats not even half of it) Your logic dosnt work. just because you evolve from something dose NOT mean you like the same things. Im related to my brother, and i dont like the same things as him AT ALL. besides you people here, hes about as opposite as one can get from me.

Are you another Belgian, or just a plain old common-or-garden pervert?

[ayerea]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Evolution is false. I will prove it.

Evolution says the common ancestor to all animals including humans is a worm. Worms live in the mud. I went out in my back yard and laid down in the mud. I didn't enjoy it. Now if I was descended from a worm wouldn't I enjoy the mud logically? This proves humans can't be descended from worms and therefore evolution is false.

Now Minister Noddy will accept The Bible as THE TRUTH?

Okay. You my friend badly badly need some amount of logic. Thats the logic a 2 year old has.
Our brains developed to be more worried about other things. because after worms (which is about as far away on the evolutionary as you can get from us) there are tons and tons of animals the evolved to eventually end up as us. starting with...oh the first mammals about... several hundred million years ago, and before that there was reptiles, and amphibians and fish, then things like the worm. to the rodents, then the monkey family, then the ape. and then the chimp then us. (thats not even half of it) Your logic dosnt work. just because you evolve from something dose NOT mean you like the same things. Im related to my brother, and i dont like the same things as him AT ALL. besides you people here, hes about as opposite as one can get from me.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

... groan ... you guys are just impossible ...

I refer you to my previous crowing celebration.

[Sister Noddy]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

... groan ... you guys are just impossible ...

[Brother Temperance]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Do you mean those nematode worm things, Bobby-Joe? ... well it was some common ancestor along that line ...

To give real scientific evidence of evolution, to reply to other comments above, I would have to post pages and pages of data, carbon dating, math equations and chemistry, it would take me hours to look it all up, and also waste the bandwidth of the forum ... so I'm not gonna do that ...

Praise! The witch has conceded defeat! Jesus defeats the secularist wiccan cult once again!

[Sister Noddy]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Evolution is false. I will prove it.

Evolution says the common ancestor to all animals including humans is a worm. Worms live in the mud. I went out in my back yard and laid down in the mud. I didn't enjoy it. Now if I was descended from a worm wouldn't I enjoy the mud logically? This proves humans can't be descended from worms and therefore evolution is false.

Now Minister Noddy will accept The Bible as THE TRUTH?

Do you mean those nematode worm things, Bobby-Joe? ... well it was some common ancestor along that line ...

To give real scientific evidence of evolution, to reply to other comments above, I would have to post pages and pages of data, carbon dating, math equations and chemistry, it would take me hours to look it all up, and also waste the bandwidth of the forum ... so I'm not gonna do that ...

Anyway it's Sunday and I am getting ready to go serve at church this morning ...

And as for accepting the Bible as truth, well I already have ... just not in the same way you believe it ...

At least you are nice to me, Bobby-Joe, and you don't slam me and insult me like the others ...

[Brother Temperance]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Also, science has been right. Look at when the entire world listened to the bible (well the Europeans at least). We had THE DARK AGES!

That's just blatant liberal propaganda. I could call the 20th Century "the anti-God queer devil-worship age", but it wouldn't make for a valid argument, now would it?

Fundamentalist literalist belief in the Bible discourages free critical inquiry, original thought, and progress.

Just like how GOD wants it! Have you even read Genesis 2 and 3, or did you just never make it that far?

Science theory is not 'theory' in the casual use of the word. Science looks at the evidence and when there is enough, an hypothesis is set up, supported by numerous scientific proven facts.

Therefore a science theory already has so much proof to back it up that it is not likely to be discarded.

What about the fact that the vast majority of all scientific theories that people ever believed in have now been discredited and discarded? Are you really so arrogant as to believe that the set of scientific theories you choose to believe in, unlike all the other ones ever, are the correct ones?

On the other hand, from the faith-based perspective, Bible literalists look for so-called 'science facts' to support the Biblical stories; they try to make already established science fit their religious beliefs; this is not science, this is the direct opposite of real scientific method.

I think you mean , my hellbound friend. Since seculiar science comes directly from Satan, it's pretty obvious where creation science must come from if it's the opposite.

Yes, evolution is probably true, and no, God didn't lie to us ... nope, don't see what you're saying at all ...

When will the fundies start to see it the way it really is? ...

First, that to be a Christian requires that we follow the teachings of Jesus as found in the New Testament ...

Yes, including Jesus' teaching that we must do the will of His Father:
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Do you know where we can find details of His Father's will? I'll give you a clue: It starts with a "Genesis" and ends with a "Malachi."

And third, that while the creation account in Genesis is a sacred story that tells us WHAT GOD DID, the advanced modern science and cosmology of today -- outlined with stable hypothesis and backed with proof -- TELLS US HOW HE DID IT, AND HOW LONG IT TOOK ...

What? Genesis tells us He created the world in 7 days, so why do we need to ask around to find out how long it took? You don't have the brains of a wombat.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Yes, evolution is probably true, and no, God didn't lie to us ... nope, don't see what you're saying at all ...

Evolution is false. I will prove it.

Evolution says the common ancestor to all animals including humans is a worm. Worms live in the mud. I went out in my back yard and laid down in the mud. I didn't enjoy it. Now if I was descended from a worm wouldn't I enjoy the mud logically? This proves humans can't be descended from worms and therefore evolution is false.

Now Minister Noddy will accept The Bible as THE TRUTH?

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

... sigh ... you're impossible ...

No, you are the impossible one.
We speak, but you refuse to listen, because you have satan for a father.
You keep contradicting the Holy Bible, fact, and even your precious science at every turn..
You simply refuse to acknowledge it.

and I believe both science (fact)

So you're saying that science = fact?
So they were correct when they claimed that magnetism and electricity had no relation whatsoever?
And later, them scientists were all right to laugh at Einstein?
Cause at first, that's what they did.

Science is nothing but theories, that keep changing & changing.
But fact (truth) NEVER change, because fact is absolute.
So how then can science = fact? Fool.

and scripture (poetic metaphor from God) at the same time ...

Do you have ANYTHING supporting that the Bible is a "poetic metaphor"?
Is the story of Joshua for instance, a "metaphor"?
That's like saying a history book is a parable.

yes all the Bible is valid but shouldn't be taken literally (am not gonna bother explaining this again) ...

You haven't "explained" anything, all you've given is your opinon and frankly, your opinon doesn't matter, especially not when it's self-contradictonary.

[Sister Noddy]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

*Sigh* This'll be fun. Can you back that up with scripture? Put up or shut up, I say!


When will *you* start to see reality? The Bible is right there in front of you! How hard can it be?


And ignore the first half of the Good Book as if it were just a piece of trash useful only as a Mexican's wallpaper?


Can you back this up using the Bible? I thought not. How many times do we have to explain this to you: God is outside of time! He is not constricted by it's bounds! And who are you to say whether something is credible or worth following, compared to God Almighty? Personally I'll trust the Creator before some sort of episcopaleion.


God *told* us how He did it. He spoke everything into existence, then breathed the Breath of Life into Adam. Honestly, did the loony bin let you out too soon?

... sigh ... you're impossible ...

... no, science doesn't need to back up with scripture, it's science ... yes, the Bible is right here in front of me, and I believe both science (fact) and scripture (poetic metaphor from God) at the same time ... yes all the Bible is valid but shouldn't be taken literally (am not gonna bother explaining this again) ...

... sigh ...

[Dr. Ernest C. Ville, D.C.S.]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Yes, evolution is probably true, and no, God didn't lie to us ... nope, don't see what you're saying at all ...

*Sigh* This'll be fun. Can you back that up with scripture? Put up or shut up, I say!

When will the fundies start to see it the way it really is? ...

When will *you* start to see reality? The Bible is right there in front of you! How hard can it be?

First, that to be a Christian requires that we follow the teachings of Jesus as found in the New Testament ...

And ignore the first half of the Good Book as if it were just a piece of trash useful only as a Mexican's wallpaper?

Second, that believing the whole Bible in literal context (Old and New Testaments together without regard to history or chronological time) not only doesn't make sense, but is not necessary to be a Christian and follow God's Word ...

Can you back this up using the Bible? I thought not. How many times do we have to explain this to you: God is outside of time! He is not constricted by it's bounds! And who are you to say whether something is credible or worth following, compared to God Almighty? Personally I'll trust the Creator before some sort of episcopaleion.

And third, that while the creation account in Genesis is a sacred story that tells us WHAT GOD DID, the advanced modern science and cosmology of today -- outlined with stable hypothesis and backed with proof -- TELLS US HOW HE DID IT, AND HOW LONG IT TOOK ...

God *told* us how He did it. He spoke everything into existence, then breathed the Breath of Life into Adam. Honestly, did the loony bin let you out too soon?

[Sister Noddy]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

If evolution were true that would mean God had lied to us. And if God had lied to us that would mean nothing would exist.

See what I'm saying? The fact that you're on the internet, trying to prove evolution PROVES that it couldn't be true. Starting to rethink your stupid beliefs now, sinners?

Yes, evolution is probably true, and no, God didn't lie to us ... nope, don't see what you're saying at all ...

When will the fundies start to see it the way it really is? ...

First, that to be a Christian requires that we follow the teachings of Jesus as found in the New Testament ...

Second, that believing the whole Bible in literal context (Old and New Testaments together without regard to history or chronological time) not only doesn't make sense, but is not necessary to be a Christian and follow God's Word ...

And third, that while the creation account in Genesis is a sacred story that tells us WHAT GOD DID, the advanced modern science and cosmology of today -- outlined with stable hypothesis and backed with proof -- TELLS US HOW HE DID IT, AND HOW LONG IT TOOK ...

[Wash O'Hanley]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

If evolution were true that would mean God had lied to us. And if God had lied to us that would mean nothing would exist.

See what I'm saying? The fact that you're on the internet, trying to prove evolution PROVES that it couldn't be true. Starting to rethink your stupid beliefs now, sinners?

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The Latest Scientifical Insanity

Unfortunately, any such picture will always be fuzzy at best due to a kind of "cosmic forgetfulness."

Their latest insult - now that accuse God of having a bad memory. Well, God doesn't need good memory because He has a thing called the "Book of Life" and these scientists aren't in it.