[James Hutchins]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

............Oh and BTW no that long ago, when human ancestors still weren't far from apes, They most likely still mated http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ns-chimps.html

So are you trying to say that this is where the negroid race comes from?

[Rejdarn]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

I was thinking about this today. According to the Darwinists, we came from monkeys. Monkeys have tails. So if why came from monkeys, why don't we have tails? WHERE IS MY TAIL, EVILUTIONISTS?!? I don't have one! 100% PROOF that EVILUTION IS A LIE!!!

We actually do have tails.
The lowest part of our spine is remains of a tail. we have evolved to not need a tail, that is why it has become shorter and shorter. We now use our hands and feet. All monkeys does not have a tail for example a gorilla

[Didymus Much]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

... All monkeys does not have a tail for example a gorilla

A gorilla is not a monkey. It's an ape. Please please please learn science before you try to teach others.

[Professor Logic]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

So are you trying to say that this is where the negroid race comes from?

Yes. Negroid race. And asian race. And indian race,


AND WHITE RACE

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Common ancestors of humans and apes lived together. Than the branch that became humans migrated to savanna

Before you were saying that the process of kicking off humanity occurred in some unique habitat (in the sense that we or our imaginary ancestors occupied savannah, whereas monkeys did not). Now you are saying that our genus was already differentiated before "we" migrated there.

Mitochondrial DNA, so-called, is observed within cells and mitochondria are proclaimed to exist in symbiosis with the host (i.e. human) cell. This is presented as an endosymbiotic relationship between a type of bacterium within each human cell & these mitochondria are said to be inherited from the mother.

When God created Adam no animal was more than 2 days old. Grass and fruit trees were 3 days old. There were no female humans:
Adam did not have a mother. In that case Adam would - obviously - have no mitochondria in his cells.

GENESIS 1:11-13 And God said, Let the Earth bring foorth grasse, the herbe yeelding seed, and the fruit tree, yeelding fruit after his kinde, whose seed is in it selfe, vpon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought foorth grasse, and herbe yeelding seed after his kinde, and the tree yeelding fruit, whose seed was in it selfe, after his kinde: and God saw that it was good. And the euening and the morning were the third day.
©1611

It is a testimony to the lovingkindness of God that He created food BEFORE any animals were created. The evolutionist suggests that flowering plants are a comparatively recent innovation and that the earliest animals (in the oceans) ate something else. The Bible explains that this is not so. Fruit trees and grasses existed BEFORE there were ANY animals. Such is the Majesty of God.

Next God created the sun (day 4) and then whales, aquatic life and birds (day 5).

GENESIS 1:21-23 And God created great whales, and euery liuing creature that moueth, which the waters brought forth aboundantly after their kinde, and euery winged foule after his kinde: and God saw that it was good. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitfull, and multiply, and fill the waters in the Seas, and let foule multiply in the earth. And the euening and the morning were the fift day.
©1611

So by day 6 there was food [grass & fruit] and whales and aquatic life and birds, cattle and creeping things and the beast of the earth. Then God created Adam and later on He created a woman when no suitable companion animal was found for Adam and IT WAS ONLY AFTER THAT that death entered, because of the sin of woman through whom we are all contaminated - although Adam bears responsibility for acquiescing re the error of his property. God teaches us:

ROMANS 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sinne entred into the world, and death by sin: and so death passed vpon all men, for that all haue sinned.
©1611

Now when you propose a time span of several hundred million years for multi-celled animals to develop, including humans which you must see as just some sort of deformed animal, there is one big problem - for you. The death which entered through sin must already have existed. In your world then, the mitochondria must already have been in Adam's cells - and yet, as we have seen from Genesis, he had no mother to inherit them from! I would say that was a fatal flaw in your theory! NOW there is a feature which may be observed in a cell, which you call the mitochondrium and which exhibits what you call "its own DNA" and NOW we live in a world where death prevails, through sin, contaminating every one of us (except Jesus). In this matter the woman is in the transgression and is it too much of a leap for you to see that it is through the mitochondrium that death is mediated? (according to your model that is: The Bible does not mention mitochondria but if that's what you want to name something you see through a microscope I can't see any reason to suggest a different name).

Adam - with no maternal inherited characteristics - would
A} not have had any such intracellular feature and
B} would not have died.

I TIMOTHY 2:14
And Adam was not deceiued, but the woman being deceiued was in the transgression: ©1611

Simple arithmetic, Prof. Logic

[UnSafe&UnSound]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Actually we evolved more from apes which do not have much of a tail, and we still have tail bones they just don't stick out. It's the same in Guinea Pigs, which have 8 tail bones, but do not have a tail which I found out from my guinea pigs.

[James Hutchins]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Actually we evolved more from apes which do not have much of a tail, and we still have tail bones they just don't stick out. It's the same in Guinea Pigs, which have 8 tail bones, but do not have a tail which I found out from my guinea pigs.

Friend, my knuckles do not drag on the ground, care to explain that?

Now you are saying Anglo Saxons are descendants of Guinea pigs?

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Actually we evolved more from apes which do not have much of a tail, and we still have tail bones they just don't stick out. It's the same in Guinea Pigs, which have 8 tail bones, but do not have a tail which I found out from my guinea pigs.

What else did they teach you?

Mark 16:15
And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

You are doing it the wrong way round.

YIC

Jack

[PrayerWarrior]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

You're a disgusting PERVERT!!! Telling me to feel my own bottom! You should be arrested for trying to make me rape myself!!! How can you live with yourself!!!

I bet you're in cahoots with Joe Beam, the false Christian sex pervert!

You're the one that's ignorant AND you're GROSS!!!

Touching your own body for non-sexual reasons is not gross. Dont you have to do that when you bathe? Or use the bathroom?

[toadtanker]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

We share DNA from monkeys and apes. About 99%. Also humans do have a tailbone. It's very small and is a section at the bottom of the spine. Monkey's need them for balance. Since humans have achieved the amazing feat of being able to walk on two legs, we don't need a tail. You don't see animals who walk on two legs. Humans are amazing ! Monkeys and Apes sometimes use very simple tools to help them. It may include using a stick to reach into places where an ape could normally not get to ( a small hole in a tree with bugs in it
). We've gone WAY further than that. Such as sharpening stones a blade or using wood to make home's, structures. Finding shiny minerals for decorations.

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Humans are amazing !

Of course. God created caucasians as His own image.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

We share DNA from monkeys and apes. About 99%. Also humans do have a tailbone. It's very small and is a section at the bottom of the spine. Monkey's need them for balance. Since humans have achieved the amazing feat of being able to walk on two legs, we don't need a tail. You don't see animals who walk on two legs. Humans are amazing ! Monkeys and Apes sometimes use very simple tools to help them. It may include using a stick to reach into places where an ape could normally not get to ( a small hole in a tree with bugs in it
). We've gone WAY further than that. Such as sharpening stones a blade or using wood to make home's, structures. Finding shiny minerals for decorations.

My grandfather was NOT a gorilla!

[VictoryOS]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Lieberals want us to be comfortable with the false idea we evolved from monkeys so they can move on to step two in their plan, which is to make us comfortable with the idea of having intimate relations with monkeys. This ties in with their agenda of pushing gay "marriage" on us.

FACT.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

FACT.

The Holy Bible!

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Lieberals want us to be comfortable with the false idea we evolved from monkeys so they can move on to step two in their plan, which is to make us comfortable with the idea of having intimate relations with monkeys. This ties in with their agenda of pushing gay "marriage" on us.

FACT.

This is why the Gay Agenda works so hard to get into the public schools. In the state of California schools are required to teach homosexual behaviors to all children.