[John Kirk]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Nobody has ever seen one species turning into another species. I just doesn't happen. Dogs change but always stay as dogs, you can't breed one into a cat no matter how hard you try.

YIC

Jack

That would be a proof against evolution, you still don't know what evolution is, go for once in your little existence give an accurate definition of evolution like in the science books from real scientists.

If you still are to stubborn to even try then shut up.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

That would be a proof against evolution

Amen!!! Shout Glory!!!

Christ wins again!!!

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

That would be a proof against evolution, you still don't know what evolution is, go for once in your little existence give an accurate definition of evolution like in the science books from real scientists.

If you still are to stubborn to even try then shut up.

Why so defensive? Is it because you know you are talking rubbish? And by the way I am fully aware of the theories of Stephen Dawkins. Can you give me an example of one animal turning into another then?

Jack

[Dan U. Holier]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Also we don't have tails because our ancestor(ape) didn't. Big apes lost their tail because they evolved a arboreal locomotion called brachiation, thus the tail became superfluous

I lost my wallet once, but an idea that all big apes lost parts of their bodies simultaneously without noticing that is simply preposterous. There should’ve been piles of lost tails all over the place.

Here is the problem again from your ignorance of the theory and fact of evlution, common ancostry doesn't mean to have characteristics from different species.

But to evolve and adapt to the envirronment, and has properties to survive in this conditions. Not to have limbs of future species, that's just ridiculous... /snip/

Wait, our “ancosters” - apes didn’t have limbs back then? How did human get them? Did the alleged "cavemen" barter them for tails at some point in time? You must be kidding, right? Besides, how can anyone believe the Tower of Babel was made by cavemen?

YiC

Dan

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

[ATTACH]17027[/ATTACH]

Go read a book or something.

That would be a proof against evolution, you still don't know what evolution is, go for once in your little existence give an accurate definition of evolution like in the science books from real scientists.

I think you need to view this comment BY A REAL QUALIFIED SCIENCE TEACHER on the subject of "science" textbooks posted by Rev. E. Flint. If you would like to become a Christian you may contact him.

If you still are to stubborn to even try then shut up.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

That would be a proof against evolution, you still don't know what evolution is, go for once in your little existence give an accurate definition of evolution like in the science books from real scientists.

If you still are to stubborn to even try then shut up.

What would be the point of that; secular science always changes their opinion every few years with some lame excuse of "additional information" Take the Pithdown man, first it was the missing link between humans and apes, suddenly its a fake. Science just pivoted on a dime there.

Now take religion; show me just once instance were Christians have change their opinion on something just because someone proved it was a fake. As you can see Christians have been the consistent ones here.

Why are you so closed minded John?

[John Kirk]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Amen!!! Shout Glory!!!

Christ wins again!!!

Yes , magically appearing animals are not proof of evolution, it appears you can't read properly.

To understand a sentence you must read the FULL sentence. Get it? Apparently you skipped some classes about reading.

I made a statement where I'm saying your claims are wrong and your comprehensions of science are very low. Can you read that properly?

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Yes , magically appearing animals are not proof of evolution, it appears you can't read properly. To understand a sentence you must read the FULL sentence. Get it? Apparently you skipped some classes about reading. I made a statement where I'm saying your claims are wrong and your comprehensions of science are very low. Can you read that properly?

Stupid nonsense spewed by someone clearly incapable of reading God's Holy Bible.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Yes , magically appearing animals are not proof of evolution, it appears you can't read properly.

To understand a sentence you must read the FULL sentence. Get it? Apparently you skipped some classes about reading.

I made a statement where I'm saying your claims are wrong and your comprehensions of science are very low. Can you read that properly?

We are not "making claims" we are stating facts. We are not looking for proofs of evolution. When God creates a new type of animal He is not "magically appearing" animals - He is CREATING them. Although Adam had no mother God does tell us that he was made from the dust of the ground Genesis 2:7 and that woman was made from Adam's rib Genesis 2:22.

I take it that you have not listened to what A SCIENCE TEACHER has to say concerning this subject by REFERRING TO THE TEXTBOOKS YOU ASKED US TO READ here is the link again

[John Kirk]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

I think you need to view this comment BY A REAL QUALIFIED SCIENCE TEACHER on the subject of "science" textbooks posted by Rev. E. Flint. If you would like to become a Christian you may contact him.

If you still are to stubborn to even try then shut up.

Yeah, I know that guy, he's known to criticize every science branch without any science education.

Look it up, he's ignorant.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Yeah, I know that guy, he's known to criticize every science branch without any science education.

Look it up, he's ignorant.

BIO: Dr. Kent Hovind
Evangelist Kent Hovind ..became a Christian at age 16 and immediately desired to serve Christ with his life. While serving as a Sunday school teacher, a church bus worker, and an avid soul winner in his public high school of more than 2,000, he continued to seek God’s purpose for his life. His keen interest in math and science throughout his high school career prompted him to enroll at Illinois Central College as a science major. After two years of undergraduate work there, he felt God calling him to full-time Christian service and completed his bachelor degree in religious education at Midwestern Baptist College in Pontiac, Michigan, in 1974.
For 15 years, he taught high school math and science, during which time he completed his master’s degree in education. While researching and writing his doctoral dissertation on the subject of creation versus evolution, he saw the tremendous need for exposing evolution as a dangerous, religious worldview, and for arming Christians with scientific evidence that there are no contradictions between true science and the Bible. In response to these goals, shortly after finishing his Ph.D. in education, he began the full-time ministry of Creation Science Evangelism.

http://www.drdino.com/about-cse/dr-kent-hovind/

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Yeah, I know that guy, he's known to criticize every science branch without any science education.

Look it up, he's ignorant.

Dear Godmocking Maggot;

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule of worshiping satan and spreading your legs for anyone with a dollar to post this hateful message. The Holy Bible tells us that we are actually Blessed by your persecution! Thanks for proving that we're right.

Matthew 5:10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
5:12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

Enjoy hell. I know that Jesus and I can't wait to watch you burn in hell for all eternity. Oh, how we'll laugh at you as you scream in agony! Shout Glory!!

YIC,

--Pastor Ezekiel

[MisterM]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

But to evolve and adapt to the envirronment, and has properties to survive in this conditions.
.....
Each parents give birth to an individual with slight variations, micro-evolution

So you are saying that child is kind of better adapted to environment? You were saying that it is survival of the fittest and now suddenly your proof is just variation in the individuals?

Let me guess, you read a book about evilution and now you say it is true, because it was in a book!

And the problem with the macro evolution is that according to the THEORY (theory, not a fact), it takes millions of years. Big problem there, age of the earth can be back traced using the Bible and it is somewhere near 6000 years. And don't even start to argue with this FACT! So called scientist may claim something else but all their THEORIES are build on other THEORIES that make ASSUMPTIONS and all of them fall a part when you take there a FACT that everything was created by the GOD!

Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Genesis 1:24 - And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

There is the survival of the fittest, I'll give you that much. But all it means that there was more species before and they did not fit in the long term plans of the GOD. If there is a evilution, how it is possible that Japanese biologist found an Eel near Palau that is just like they claimed the ancestor of the Eels had been? Maybe it has first evolved to modern Eel and then back? Or maybe the simple explanation is that God created them all same time. Some species just don't have what it takes (as God planned) and they die.


YiC, M

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Praise JESUS!!

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

If there is a evilution, how it is possible that Japanese biologist found an Eel near Palau that is just like they claimed the ancestor of the Eels had been?

I checked out that eel and was amazed at how far from God's Word these foolish so-called "scientists" have degenerated.
We KNOW when the creation event occurred: Anno Mundi 0years 0months 0weeks day5

GENESIS 1
20 And God said, Let the waters bring foorth aboundantly the mouing creature that hath life, and foule that may flie aboue the earth in the open firmament of heauen.
21 And God created great whales, and euery liuing creature that moueth, which the waters brought forth aboundantly after their kinde, and euery winged foule after his kinde: and God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitfull, and multiply, and fill the waters in the Seas, and let foule multiply in the earth.
23 And the euening and the morning were the fift day.
©1611

That peculiar eel is not peculiar at all. Have a look at this electric eel, a "modern" "highly evolved knife fish" the Darwinista say.
The similarities are obvious, its affinity for water, the way it moves, its colour..

It is no younger than that supposedly 200,000,000 year old eel from Palau and was created on the same day approximately 6,000 years ago. God created a variety of eels, we know that because of all the eels that are still with us.

Because of sin Romans 5:12 some eels made corrupt decisions and became extinct: we know that too. But these two varieties have survived, unchanged, quite happily and we know that the "scientists" who say otherwise are deranged maniacs at best, who would just LURVE to see us all degenerate.

Well, that process may already be underway..

it's “science” Jim, but not as we know it