[SayvedByTheLord]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

No it does not. It means that sometimes people, you yourself being one of those, are possessed by evil spirits (demons).

You raise a good point Brother, but Sister Justina is the authority on this subject.

[Rev Jeffrey Lebowski]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

I does heartfelt apologize to the congregation.
I received an infraction from Sister Mary Maria for not citing KJV 1611 Scripture in my aforementioned astronaut/monkey post.
I shall henceforth repent, beginning now:
After again taking my meds', I doubled checked the KJV 1611 Gideon.
OK. it starts long time ago with angry monkeys:
KJV 2 Chronicles 9:21 For the king's ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.
Now it is a fact that monkeys/apes carry a grudge . They will fling poo at ya for even looking at them wrong. Being cooped up on a boat with screaming peacocks will tick a monkey off for a long, long time.

So, now onto the righteous astronauts, or prophetnauts , or angelnauts:
KJV Psalms 18:10 And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly:yeah he did fly upon the wings of the wind
KJV Acts 10:11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descended upon him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners and let down to the earth.
KJV Acts 10:16 This was done thrice:and the vessel was received up again into heaven.
KJV Acts 11:15 I was in the city of Joppa praying:and in a trance I saw a vision, A certain vessel descend, as it had been a great sheet, let down from heaven by four corners: and it came even to me
KJV Zechariah 5:11 Then I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying roll.
So angels is perfectly capable of chauffeuring Prophets, or righteous humans, around in flying vessels from Heaven .We can call them today, spaceships, and thus the drivers are astronautical chauffeurs.

Now, monkeys/apes have a grudge: and prophets (ie Moses) can return to earth in flying vessels (ie spaceships). You may ask WHY?
Good question! The answer is The Beast and the end-times war.
KJV Isaiah 13:5 They come from a far country,from the end of heaven, [even]the Lord, and the weapons of His indignation, to destroy the whole land.
So apes and monkeys will be confronted just like it says KJV Joel 7 They shall run like mighty men; they shall climb the wall like men of war; and they shall march every one on his ways, and they shall not break their ranks: Note the use of AS and LIKE . That describes Old Testament monkeys who is as and like the appearance of men.

This is where the Old Testament Part Ends and New Testaments begin by saying {note Esaias is Greek for Isaiah) thus KJV Matthew 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
That's why all this is to hard for many un-reverended to understands.

Finally, the prophet Moses smiting them ape/monkey beast who follow THE SATAN BEAST in end-times is from :
KJV Revelation 22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophet sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.
Angels were probably driving the Lords military spaceships (ie: space chariots, flying rolls and instructing the use of weapons to be used upon the ape-beast who follow the Anti-Christ Beast. etc etc)
KJV Revelation 11:3 And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth. (see prior picture of Moses in sackcloth)

Finally: best part--- KJV Revelation 19
1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God: 2 For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. 3 And again they said, Alleluia And her smoke rose up for ever and ever. 4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia. 5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small {ie monkeys} and great {ie :us humans}.
And KJV Revelation: 17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun {note the up in the space!} ; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God 18 That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them {warrior monkeys on horses!)and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. 19And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse (ape beast!!), and against his army (monkey army fighting against the humans!!).20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast {furry 666}, and them that worshipped his image {apes/monkeys and bad tailed humans}. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.21 And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse,{Moses and other prophets & good Angels} which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.
Now the part that I maybe can see I took a bad mis-understanding' is the sword of him , cause and today's' and likely future Christian soldiers carry M-16's guns and that is the allegorical sword we use on Mooslim beast armies.

Normally I strictly adhere to KJV 1 Timothy 12 suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
But Sister Mary Mary was 100% correct in reprimanding me for not quoting Scripture, especially since this is a Sunday. I do defer to her wisdom and LBC seniority.
I'm sorry. I repent.
Oh, and this don't have much to do with tails on humans, unless when the end-times come and the Devil helps assist humans into beast-like followers of Anti-Christ....with tails.

Rev Jeffrey Lebowski
Sister Verna Too {she is TIVO-ing Jesse Duplantis, so I can use his sermon as my own}

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Brother James last night the little lady and myself stopped at a deli for a bite to eat, at the table next to us two men were in a heated debate on this very subject. One stated we evolved from monkeys, the other said we evolved from fish. This went on for the better part of an hour, my wife and I just sat and laughed the entire time. As we were leaving I stopped and thanked them for the comedy hour, I gave them a copy of the KJV1611 and suggested that they read the first book called Genesis.

Seems silly to me the answer is given in the Bible!

I've encountered fools arguing about that kind of thing too. It just makes them all look like monkeys in my view.

I always keep a few copies of THIS Chick Tract to hand out for situations like that.

[Miriam]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Atheists are so STOOPID! Don't they understand they're all going to Hell? Why don't they all use their logic and see the Bible's irrefutable truth?

Praise Jesus Christ brothers, praise the lord!

[True Disciple]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

The fact of the matter is, is that we do. Albeit it is very minuscule as it is a remnant of the evolutionary process, but it is still their. And I repeat we do have tails when we were in our mothers womb. Your tail bone is able to be felt from the outside so that should be proof in and of itself.

1. Could you please stop encouraging people to touch themselves on spots they normally do not touch? There are impressionable young children reading this thread.
2. The "tailbone" has several muscles attached to it, so it fullfills another function than being a tail (see the paper supplied by Pastor Ezekiel)
3. I've heard atheists say that the tailbone is only a nuisance, but this doesn't imply that it therefore has no purpose; being a nuisance can very well be a purpose. Maybe God provided us with this suboptimally working organ as a means to punish us if we would sin.

it became necessary to be more agile in order to hunt. The tail would obviously have hindered this.

My friend, this doesn't make sense at all. Look at the cheetah, the lioness, the wolf, the fox. They are way more agile than we are, and they do have tails, and they are essential for them to keep balance.

Amazing, the ridiculous assumptions evolutionists make in order to deny the Bible.

[EightyEight]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

My friend, this doesn't make sense at all. Look at the cheetah, the lioness, the wolf, the fox. They are way more agile than we are, and they do have tails, and they are essential for them to keep balance.

Interesting comparison. However, those are all naturally quadripedal animals. As bipedal humans, we do not have body mass that expands horizontally through space away from our center of balance. We are able to distribute our weight along a vertical plane, which means a tail would be completely useless.

And, I'm afraid, their tails are not essential for them to keep balance (see animals with very short [almost no] tails, such as the lynx). It certainly aids them in keeping balance, but this generally applies to when the animal in question is balancing on something thin, like a tree limb, or falling through the air (why cats almost always land on their feet).

Not arguing with you, just saying if you want to argue with the evolutionists, you have to have rational arguments.

[James Hutchins]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Interesting comparison. However, those are all naturally quadripedal animals. As bipedal humans, we do not have body mass that expands horizontally through space away from our center of balance. We are able to distribute our weight along a vertical plane, which means a tail would be completely useless.

And, I'm afraid, their tails are not essential for them to keep balance (see animals with very short [almost no] tails, such as the lynx). It certainly aids them in keeping balance, but this generally applies to when the animal in question is balancing on something thin, like a tree limb, or falling through the air (why cats almost always land on their feet).

Not arguing with you, just saying if you want to argue with the evolutionists, you have to have rational arguments.

What a crock! I've seen many animals whose tail was removed and they were fine. The only reason animals have tails is so a man can grab them and crontrol the animal from a safe distance. For example, how could you swing a cat properly if it did not have a tail?

[EightyEight]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

I've seen many animals whose tail was removed and they were fine.

My point exactly!

The only reason animals have tails is so a man can grab them and crontrol the animal from a safe distance.

Assuming the animal doesn't just turn around, I suppose...

For example, how could you swing a cat properly if it did not have a tail?

Hahaha, I don't suppose I could

[James Hutchins]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

My point exactly!

No, I think you missed it. I was refering to animals I've eaten. The tails have so little meat as to not be missed.

Assuming the animal doesn't just turn around, I suppose...

That is why you have to be pulling, not merely holding on.

Hahaha, I don't suppose I could

Of course not. Do not be ridiculous.

[EightyEight]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

No, I think you missed it. I was refering to animals I've eaten. The tails have so little meat as to not be missed.

Now THAT I can whole-heartedly agree with.

[GOD=life]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

88: what's the binding force of the atom?

[EightyEight]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

88: what's the binding force of the atom?

I will look into it and get back to you. Though I'm not sure why you're asking me, as you have the same set of resources available

[Rev Jeffrey Lebowski]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

May I briefly interrupt this fine discussion to humbly apologize again?
Pastor Ezekiel also reprimanded me about the Leviticus miss-quote.
I'm sorry Pastor.
I truly try to row my oar on this Galley-for-God.
Connecting all the pro bono vestigial dots sometimes taxes my merda taurorum animas conturbit abilities.

I go now, for a long medication meditation.

Please continue with this monkeys tale.

[EightyEight]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

I will look into it and get back to you. Though I'm not sure why you're asking me, as you have the same set of resources available

Alrighty. From what I discovered after a very small amount of research, scientists claim that atoms are bonded together to form molecules by a few different ways, depending on the molecule.

In the context of ionic compounds, like sodium chloride (salt), the positively-charged sodium ions and negatively-charged chloride ions electrostatically attract each other and arrange themselves into a lattice so that each sodium is surrounded by chloride, and vice versa. Hence in this instance it is the ionic charges that hold the crystal together.
----
In a covalently-bonded molecule, such as a hydrocarbon, the atoms share electrons with each other; if an atom tried to move away from another one it would either be left lacking one or more electrons, or have too many electrons. It would consequently be charged, as would the parent molecule it came from. This charge difference would pull the atoms back together; this is effectively what a covalent bond is.

[stever the believer]

Re: If we came from monkeys, why don't we have tails?

Are you calling me a darkie?

I can assure you I have never been in Africa, and neither did my parents, grandparents, grand-grandparents, and, um, other old people in my family.

I have always been lilly-white, why thank you. Just like my true ancestors, Adam and that woman.

I am going to expound on what John Scopes was saying although I do not agree with evolution in the Darwinian sense. In simple terms (although it's more complicated), we have variability in our genes. Recessive genes, etc... So for example, let's say the original humans, Adam and Eve, had AaBb genes. They have kids and their kids have kids, etc. over time, the genes are mixed into AABb, AAbb, aaBB and so on. For some reason, the humans spread away from each other where the gene pools continue without mixing with the other groups causing variability in the skin color (melanin) and features. That reason of separation is told in the Bible. It was an event regarding the Tower of Babel where God confused the single language with a multitude of languages and the people groups went their own ways across the world. Over time, the various groups lost certain genes and became certain skin colors resulting in white people, black people, etc... It is theorized that Adam and Eve were darker skinned like those in the Middle East because they would contain more of the genes necessary to create the skin colors that we have today.

Here's a great representation of the idea:


<Blasphemous Link Deleted>