[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

No, actually, I was giving an example about how it is possible to accelerate processes. You were talking about how can decay rates be determined when the technology is quite new. There are ways to get around that, as I've demonstrated with the artificial yet not artificial gemstone example.

Now your making up my argument!?!? Do you have any shame? You can't win this debate and it is clear to everyone that you have lost. You've put the nail in your own coffin. Satan accelerated some rocks to make them look older and you and your idiot monkey worshipers fell for it hook, line, and sinker. How gullible is that!!!

Radiometric dating determines the age of certain objects. The age of 4.5 billion is an approximation, an exact date is not known for certain. However, dating certain objects and remains shows how long they have been around. And it is a lot longer than 6000 years

Without a time machine to go back and verify the validity of your supposedly "reliable" dating methods you can't make in definitive claim.

I'm calling you out, harlot!!! You're radiometric dating methods are wrong and you have absolutely no means to verify the theory of a steady decay rate of isotopes over a 4.5 billion year time frame. You've all but admitted that "acceleration" can make objects that should take lots of time in little time.

Either prove that these isotopes decayed at a steady rate for over 4.5 billion years without anything speeding it up or slowing it down in all that time or admit defeat. Those are your only options. I will not let you continue to stall because you are too proud to admit you can't back up your wild claims.

As to using a 10 year old technology as an example, I was doing so to illustrate how something can be extremely reliable, yet not 100% infallible.

You can't say it's reliable seeing that you can't verify that the results are correct to begin with. You are ASSUMING THEY ARE. You admit your scientist are fallible. Face it, wench, it's over. You lose.

Dude, you've just done the exact same thing, only this time you've added pictures! Anyone can do that! I could, if I wanted to, provide a series of pictures showing that I created the universe, which you would not be able to disprove for certain.

Of course I could disprove it. As a man I'm superior to you and I can't create a universe. Therefore, you can't. Case closed.

I could show a series of pictures to illustrate that the boogeyman is active and well in Southern England etc.
I'm talking about other things outside the bible that support those words, because those pictures support the scientific theory a lot more.

The world is proof outside the Bible, nincompoop. DUH!!!!

You want me to prove the Bible is truthful without the Bible. That's like asking me to prove that a pink unicorn is pink without the unicorn. That's pure feeble minded female idiocy for you. Eh, how about you tell me the age of the earth is 4.5 billion years old without ever setting foot on Earth.

No it isn't. No physically dated evidence, at all, supports the young earth theory. Absolutely none!!

*yawn* You've already shown that dating is pointless because Satan can accelerate matter and you don't have a time machine to test the validity of your billion year assumptions.

And do you know jesus, personally? Have you met him? Have you spoken to him? Could you say that the biblical version of jesus existed for certain because YOU have met him? No, you can't. !!!STOP!!! Correction!!!

Yes, Yes, Yes, and Yes. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

No, reason would be examining ALL the evidence objectively. Not looking at one thing in a biased way and refusing to consider anything else.

Isn't that what you are doing? Objective reasoning would dictate that you don't KNOW anything because you didn't actually see or experience the world's creation firsthand. Typical atheist hypocrisy.

[blah blah blah]... I will concede.

Of course you will.

Looks like another victory for Remy Lebeau, folks *Fans cheer*

Ding dong the witch is DEAD!!! *shakes hands of spectators amid cheers and congratulations*

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

So you're saying God can create that which appears to have taken billions of years within a 6000 year period by "accelerating"? Clearly it can't be that hard if scientist can accelerate too. And if they can do it then no doubt satan, their father, can accelerate as well!!!!

No, actually, I was giving an example about how it is possible to accelerate processes. You were talking about how can decay rates be determined when the technology is quite new. There are ways to get around that, as I've demonstrated with the artificial yet not artificial gemstone example.

How can you verify the reliability of the age of the Earth using a 10 year old technology? Think about it. Let's say you are wrong and the Earth is 6000 years old. But your radiometric dating claims it's 4.5 billion. Given the fact that the Earth is 6000 years old, one can only conclude that your dating method is unreliable.

Radiometric dating determines the age of certain objects. The age of 4.5 billion is an approximation, an exact date is not known for certain. However, dating certain objects and remains shows how long they have been around. And it is a lot longer than 6000 years.
As to using a 10 year old technology as an example, I was doing so to illustrate how something can be extremely reliable, yet not 100% infallible.

So, how do you verify that the Earth is actually 4.5 billion years old as opposed to your dating method reliably giving you the same incorrect data. Just because something keeps generating the same incorrect answer does not make it correct.

See my answer above.

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.


God said He created the Earth and there is a picture of the Earth.

Genesis 1:
[9] And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.[10] And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.


God said He created the earth and seas and there is a picture of the Earth and seas.

Genesis 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.


God said He created the grass, trees, etc. and there is a picture of the grass, trees, etc.

Dude, you've just done the exact same thing, only this time you've added pictures!
Anyone can do that! I could, if I wanted to, provide a series of pictures showing that I created the universe, which you would not be able to disprove for certain.
I could show a series of pictures to illustrate that the boogeyman is active and well in Southern England etc.
I'm talking about other things outside the bible that support those words, because those pictures support the scientific theory a lot more.

Everything in the Bible is verifiably true. Check and Mate!!!!

No it isn't. No physically dated evidence, at all, supports the young earth theory. Absolutely none!!

I've debunked your silly theories already. You have not been able to counter any of my counter arguments to your hair brained theories.

No you haven't. You've just repeated the same silly words over and over and this time added pictures.

Didn't need a time machine. I have the eyewitness account of Jesus Himself who was actually there. I think you just put your foot in your mouth.old

And do you know jesus, personally? Have you met him? Have you spoken to him? Could you say that the biblical version of jesus existed for certain because YOU have met him? No, you can't. The only thing that you're basing the existence of the biblical jesus on is that book. That book which was written by men.

Let me guess... "reason" equals blindly believing in whatever some fallible human being tells you?

No, reason would be examining ALL the evidence objectively. Not looking at one thing in a biased way and refusing to consider anything else.

Now I'm a very patient man, but I will not tolerate these racist remarks you have been making. Keep it up and you'll be getting A WHOLE MESS of infraction points.

The irony here is just staggering.

You are such a hypocrite, Van Hellbound. You are clearly trying to super impose your attributes on to me so that I appear to be the feeble minded woman and you the True Christian Man. This last ditch attempt to steal the victory by switching positions has failed. Only the most idiotic of women would try such a silly tactic. Based on this latest shameful attempt on your part I can take it that you admit defeat?

Ok, well, I should have phrased that last bit as 'you are doing the EQUIVALENT of putting your virtual fingers in your virtual ears etc etc' instead of the way I phrased it. That much and that much only I will concede.
As to admitting defeat, it was you who did that quite a few posts ago. Not in exact words, but in other ways.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

There are ways to accelerate processes. For instance, take precious stones. Using created gemstones as our example; ordinarily, when found naturally, they take many years to form. In a lab, with accelerated processes, they can be formed very quickly. And they will have the same chemical and optical properties as naturally formed gemstones. Except, they were made quickly in a lab, instead of taking years to form in the Earth. See where I'm going here? If it were impossible to accelerate processes to a degree of accuracy, then created gemstones would not be possible. But they are, and they exist, so there you go.

So you're saying God can create that which appears to have taken billions of years within a 6000 year period by "accelerating"? Clearly it can't be that hard if scientist can accelerate too. And if they can do it then no doubt satan, their father, can accelerate as well!!!!

GLORY!!! I think this heathen is coming around to the Truth!!!!

Using an IUD contraceptive as an example for instance. IUD's are effective 98-99.4% of the time. Which means that yes, they are not infallible, but, they are reliable. Same thing with the dating methods, To say infallible wouldn't be accurate, to say reliable, would be.

How can you verify the reliability of the age of the Earth using a 10 year old technology? Think about it. Let's say you are wrong and the Earth is 6000 years old. But your radiometric dating claims it's 4.5 billion. Given the fact that the Earth is 6000 years old, one can only conclude that your dating method is unreliable.

So, how do you verify that the Earth is actually 4.5 billion years old as opposed to your dating method reliably giving you the same incorrect data. Just because something keeps generating the same incorrect answer does not make it correct.

Check and Mate!!!

Now, seeing as I've provided examples for you, please do the same and find me a single thing OUTSIDE of the bible which supports it.

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.


God said He created the Earth and there is a picture of the Earth.

Genesis 1:
[9] And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.[10] And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.


God said He created the earth and seas and there is a picture of the Earth and seas.

Genesis 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.


God said He created the grass, trees, etc. and there is a picture of the grass, trees, etc.

Everything in the Bible is verifiably true. Check and Mate!!!!

Otherwise every single one of your arguments are meaningless. But, I think you've aptly already proved that they are.

I've debunked your silly theories already. You have not been able to counter any of my counter arguments to your hair brained theories.

And did you hop in your time machine to find out that what the bible says is true? Nope, you didn't, but in using that argument, you sure put your foot in your mouth. Lol!

Didn't need a time machine. I have the eyewitness account of Jesus Himself who was actually there. I think you just put your foot in your mouth.

True logic??? That isn't logic, it's you being dogmatic and refusing to see reason. The only people who would accept that as logic are other people like you.

Let me guess... "reason" equals blindly believing in whatever some fallible human being tells you?

Neanderthals died out a long time ago. They are related to humans but they aren't human. That picture you posted was a human being, not a neanderthal. Sheeesh, even an elementary school kid would know as much.

Now I'm a very patient man, but I will not tolerate these racist remarks you have been making. Keep it up and you'll be getting A WHOLE MESS of infraction points.

You haven't whipped anything. All you've done is put your virtual fingers in your virtual ears and virtually sung out 'LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!' while posting the same faulty arguments over and over.

Now you're putting words in my mouth after you just said,

You seem to be assuming, and putting words into my mouth. I don't do that to you in your arguments, please be polite enough to extend the same courtesy.

You are such a hypocrite, Van Hellbound. You are clearly trying to super impose your attributes on to me so that I appear to be the feeble minded woman and you the True Christian Man. This last ditch attempt to steal the victory by switching positions has failed. Only the most idiotic of women would try such a silly tactic. Based on this latest shameful attempt on your part I can take it that you admit defeat?

[Talitha]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Well done Brother! You seem to have proved with out a doubt that the Earth IS only 6000 years old! Those heathens in their science labs with their "facts" don't even realise that the Bible is a 100% factual account of History! "Oh the Grand Canyon took thousands to millions of years to form!" Sure buddy. It was the Floods that carved that out! In one fell swoop!

See?
Even you, with your blinkered tunnel vision is now getting the idea that God did ALL this.
Pastor Ezekiels Sermons are a wonder to behold.

PRAISE THE LORD!

[GaryTheBanana]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Beginning with the archeological landmark event of the fall of Jerusalem (which has now been corrected to 588 B.C., instead of 586-587 B.C.) and counting backwards the prophesied number of years between this event and the division of Solomon's kingdom (390 yrs. + 40 yrs., according to Ezekiel 4:4-7), brings us to 1018 B.C.

From the end of Solomon's 40-year reign to the start of the Temple in the 4th year of his reign takes us back another 37 years to 1055 B.C.

From the start of Solomon's Temple "in the 480th year" (1 Kings 6:1) back to the Exodus from Egypt (hence 479 years previous) brings us to near 1534 B.C.

From the Exodus out of Egypt to Abraham's entering Canaan from Haran was exactly 430 years to the day (Gen 12:10/ Exodus 12:40/ Gal 3:17), thus around 1964 B.C.

Since Abraham entered Canaan at age 75 (Gen 12:4), he was born approximately 2039 B.C.

From Abraham's birth to Noah's grandson (Shem's son), Arpachshad's birth, 2 years after the Flood started, was 290 years (Gen 11:11-26), this places the onset of the Flood at around 2331 B.C. [definitely 4,300-4,400 years ago].

The genealogy of Genesis 5:3-32 precludes any gaps due to its tight chronological structure and gives us 1,656 years between Creation and the Flood, thus bringing Creation Week back to near 3987 B.C. or approximately 4000 B.C.

Therefore, the Biblical age of the Earth (using Scripture itself as a guide) is 6,000 years !! Mankind did not evolve 4 million years ago on an Earth which is 4.5 billion years old in a universe which was "big-banged" into existence 18-20 billion years in the distant past. Jesus Christ, the Creator Incarnate, said He made mankind male and female in the beginning (Mark 10:6), and that when the heavens and the earth were commanded into being (Gen 1:1), they "stood up together" (Isa 48:13) not billions of years apart !!

Case closed.

Well done Brother! You seem to have proved with out a doubt that the Earth IS only 6000 years old! Those heathens in their science labs with their "facts" don't even realise that the Bible is a 100% factual account of History! "Oh the Grand Canyon took thousands to millions of years to form!" Sure buddy. It was the Floods that carved that out! In one fell swoop!

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

How can you determine a half-life of billions of years when we have only had about 50 or so odd years of your so-called science? It's absurd, Rachael, and you know it. That is like me saying my refrigerator will last me until 2050. Maybe the manufacturers feel it's that reliable, but who knows what factors can come into play within 43 years? How could someone possibly make such a statement and keep a straight face?

There are ways to accelerate processes. For instance, take precious stones. Using created gemstones as our example; ordinarily, when found naturally, they take many years to form. In a lab, with accelerated processes, they can be formed very quickly. And they will have the same chemical and optical properties as naturally formed gemstones. Except, they were made quickly in a lab, instead of taking years to form in the Earth. See where I'm going here? If it were impossible to accelerate processes to a degree of accuracy, then created gemstones would not be possible.
But they are, and they exist, so there you go.

Your petty argument is debunked, heathen.

Nope, I'd say yours is.

You just demonstrated that I am right. I take it you admit your wrong. GLORY!!!

Nope, the only thing I just demonstrated is that you do not have even a basic understanding of sarcasm.

Once again you run away from the truth with your tail betwixt your syphilitic legs. You have once more admitted that you cannot produce any evidence with 100% verifiability to support your insane conjectures. Well, the Bible is 100% correct and that fact is 100% verifiable. PRAISE!!!

Something does not need to have 100% infallibility to be reliable.
Infallible versus reliable.
Using an IUD contraceptive as an example for instance. IUD's are effective 98-99.4% of the time. Which means that yes, they are not infallible, but, they are reliable. Same thing with the dating methods, To say infallible wouldn't be accurate, to say reliable, would be.

Now, seeing as I've provided examples for you, please do the same and find me a single thing OUTSIDE of the bible which supports it. Otherwise every single one of your arguments are meaningless. But, I think you've aptly already proved that they are.

Did you hop in your time machine and find that out? old
There are false christians and there are TRUE CHRISTIANS. Don't pretend that you don't know the difference, harlot. True Christianity has NEVER changed. It has ALWAYS been the same direct revelation from God Almighty.The KJV 1611 is a direct revelation from God to show the false christians the error of their false Bibles.

And did you hop in your time machine to find out that what the bible says is true? Nope, you didn't, but in using that argument, you sure put your foot in your mouth. Lol!

Hypothetical or not, the question still remains: Is the eyewitness account of the Maker evidence of the means in which the creation as created? Clearly it is, but you're trying to sneak away from the question like the sneaky snake you are.

That is not an eyewitness account. That is a collection of mythical tales, put together by many men over the years (in keeping to the whole sexist agenda) ideas which were twisted and stolen from other sources, as I've mentioned before.

Sneaky snake!! LOL!!!

Once again you run away like a scared little feeble minded girl who is far out of her league. Your entire array of scientific conjectures are all hypothesis. Using hypothetical analogy should make this a level playing field for you, but alas, you realize that true logic and reason trumps your false science. HALLELUJAH!!!!

True logic??? That isn't logic, it's you being dogmatic and refusing to see reason. The only people who would accept that as logic are other people like you.

But theivery, murder, assualt, etc. are all acceptable? Typical atheist dogma. No moral fiber whatsoever...

I never said they were. You seem to be assuming, and putting words into my mouth. I don't do that to you in your arguments, please be polite enough to extend the same courtesy.

Neanderthals ARE human beings, Nincompoop. Shame on you for trying to claim they weren't human under the guise of saying they were. You tricky little devil. Did your husband tell you to employ that trick? Sorry, but I've detected your racist message and I'm going to have to ask you to stop your racist tirade right this instance!!!!

Neanderthals died out a long time ago. They are related to humans but they aren't human. That picture you posted was a human being, not a neanderthal. Sheeesh, even an elementary school kid would know as much.

Men dominate women all over the globe? And we can do that all the while being lazy? What does that say about you feeble women? I've sure whipped your butt in this debate all the while doing it "the lazy way", as you put it.

You haven't whipped anything. All you've done is put your virtual fingers in your virtual ears and virtually sung out 'LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!' while posting the same faulty arguments over and over. Whilst it is entertaining, it is also somewhat frustrating that you cannot even adhere to the basic rules of debate while you claim others have that same fault. Tsk tsk.

[Unsaved and Loving It]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Actually, all women deserve to be raped

I seem to remember some Muslim Cleric saying that once. Are you saying that the two can share common mind?

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Rape is not ok regardless of who is committing the crime. No one should rape ANYONE. EVER.

Actually, all women deserve to be raped -- the shape of their bodies is a natural come-on to men, whether they're flaunting it or playing "hard to get" by covering themselves with clothes. We just believe that white women should have the honor of being raped by white Christian men instead of bestial negroid bucks. There are plenty of nigresses out there who God created specifically to satisfy their animal instincts.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Dear gods, did see what you just said? Anyone who knows anything about basic chemistry will know that half-lives are quite easy to determine. For instance, the half life of radioactive materials such as uranium-238 is billions of years. Meaning it is going to be around to poison the planet for a loooong time. And they can tell this by testing it, NOT because they've been sitting around all those millions of years waiting for it to decay.

How can you determine a half-life of billions of years when we have only had about 50 or so odd years of your so-called science? It's absurd, Rachael, and you know it. That is like me saying my refrigerator will last me until 2050. Maybe the manufacturers feel it's that reliable, but who knows what factors can come into play within 43 years? How could someone possibly make such a statement and keep a straight face?

Your petty argument is debunked, heathen.

Now let me give YOU an example:

Rachael: Prove that the Earth is only 6000 years old.
Remy: Becuase the bible says so.
Rachael: Do you have any evidence whatsoever to support the bible's claims?
Remy: YOU ARE JUST A WOMAN AND INFERIOR!! THE BIBLE IS RIGHT THEREFORE SO AM I!! ME RIGHT YOU WRONG!!!

You just demonstrated that I am right. I take it you admit your wrong. GLORY!!!

Irrelevant. The 100% factor need not apply. These methods have been tested under enough different conditions to produce a consistent respose. Asking for 100% is rather dumb, and that's why you asked for it, hoping I'd fall into that trap. Guess again.

Once again you run away from the truth with your tail betwixt your syphilitic legs. You have once more admitted that you cannot produce any evidence with 100% verifiability to support your insane conjectures. Well, the Bible is 100% correct and that fact is 100% verifiable. PRAISE!!!

I'm sorry, but a book which has been over-edited is not proof that the deity mentioned within is the creator of the universe. Maybe you think so, but that doesn't make it true. Early forms of christianity, before this version of the bible, was actually quite different. And would have been different had it not been for that book.

Did you hop in your time machine and find that out?
There are false christians and there are TRUE CHRISTIANS. Don't pretend that you don't know the difference, harlot. True Christianity has NEVER changed. It has ALWAYS been the same direct revelation from God Almighty.The KJV 1611 is a direct revelation from God to show the false christians the error of their false Bibles.

Umm....if you're basing that statement on a hypothetical pie which I hypothetically baked, you need to lay off whatever it is you're smoking.

Hypothetical or not, the question still remains: Is the eyewitness account of the Maker evidence of the means in which the creation as created? Clearly it is, but you're trying to sneak away from the question like the sneaky snake you are.

Once again you run away like a scared little feeble minded girl who is far out of her league. Your entire array of scientific conjectures are all hypothesis. Using hypothetical analogy should make this a level playing field for you, but alas, you realize that true logic and reason trumps your false science. HALLELUJAH!!!!

Rape is not ok regardless of who is committing the crime. No one should rape ANYONE. EVER.

But theivery, murder, assualt, etc. are all acceptable? Typical atheist dogma. No moral fiber whatsoever...

That's a human being, not a neanderthal! You're sick!

Neanderthals ARE human beings, Nincompoop. Shame on you for trying to claim they weren't human under the guise of saying they were. You tricky little devil. Did your husband tell you to employ that trick? Sorry, but I've detected your racist message and I'm going to have to ask you to stop your racist tirade right this instance!!!!

You need to stop replying the lazy way.
Oh, wait, I forgot. Men can't multi-task. That's why you do it the lazy way.

Men dominate women all over the globe? And we can do that all the while being lazy? What does that say about you feeble women? I've sure whipped your butt in this debate all the while doing it "the lazy way", as you put it.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

What a hypocrite...
"Radiometric dating (often called radioactive dating) is a technique used to date materials based on a knowledge of the decay rates of naturally occurring isotopes, and the current abundances."

Radiometric or carbon: It's all fallible and depends on making gross assumptions. I get my information from the Creator of the Universe Himself. Information that is infallible. Without that time machine to verify the original amount of a given element you have no case. Who knows what factors entered into play throughout time that could have effected the samples.

Whatever information they are gathering, it has to be indicating 6000ish years because that is how long ago the Creator said He created it. The claim that the results indicate 4.5 billion years would have to be an error on the part of the infallible so-called scientists. They simply don't know enough about God's creation to understand their own results. It's pretty sad actually.

Dear gods, did see what you just said? Anyone who knows anything about basic chemistry will know that half-lives are quite easy to determine. For instance, the half life of radioactive materials such as uranium-238 is billions of years. Meaning it is going to be around to poison the planet for a loooong time. And they can tell this by testing it, NOT because they've been sitting around all those millions of years waiting for it to decay.
There are ways to look back, and to look forward, like particle accelerators (though those are irrelevant to this discussion).

Now I realize you are only a woman and don't fully comprehend the nature of debate. So allow me to spell it out for you.

Above is my counter argument to your statements concerning the reliability of radiometric and carbon dating.

You now have to explain WHY THAT ARGUMENT IS WRONG. You CANNOT just say "Nuh-uh" and completely ignore my argument. Until you explain why my counter-argument is wrong you are admitting I am right.

Quit being a sexist jerk for one moment, would ya?
In my above argument I covered that.

I realize you're just a dumb woman so let me give you an example.

Now let me give YOU an example:

Rachael: Prove that the Earth is only 6000 years old.
Remy: Becuase the bible says so.
Rachael: Do you have any evidence whatsoever to support the bible's claims?
Remy: YOU ARE JUST A WOMAN AND INFERIOR!! THE BIBLE IS RIGHT THEREFORE SO AM I!! ME RIGHT YOU WRONG!!!

Explain how you know 100% that no other factors transpired throughout the years to effect the decay rates of isotope or carbon.

Explain how you know 100% the original state and amounts of the said isotopes and carbon as it was thousands of years ago.

Explain how you know 100% that the laws of nature have been exactly the same for thousands of years straight. Seeing that your so-called science is relatively new you don't even know if Jesus has changed the laws of physics around after the flood, after His temporary death, etc. Back in the day people could genetically manipulate cattle by putting certain kinds of sticks in their water troughs.

Irrelevant. The 100% factor need not apply. These methods have been tested under enough different conditions to produce a consistent respose. Asking for 100% is rather dumb, and that's why you asked for it, hoping I'd fall into that trap. Guess again.

Explain how your assumptions of absolute knowledge are all 100% correct even though you and your scientist false gods are infallible mortals.

Good luck.

As above.

I am not insulting anyone. You ARE a feeble minded woman. I've had to hold your hand and practically explain to you how to debate against me. You make a 10 year old nigra look like a certified Einstein. Van Hellbound, you have no business laughing at anyone but yourself.

Too funny! I'll be sending this page to at least ten people so they can all have a giggle at you.

The Words of the Being who Created the Universe isn't evidence? So if you baked a pie your eyewitness account wouldn't serve as evidence as to what kind of pie you made?

I'm sorry, but a book which has been over-edited is not proof that the deity mentioned within is the creator of the universe. Maybe you think so, but that doesn't make it true. Early forms of christianity, before this version of the bible, was actually quite different. And would have been different had it not been for that book.

Are you that unreliable, Rachael? How can we trust anything you say now?

Umm....if you're basing that statement on a hypothetical pie which I hypothetically baked, you need to lay off whatever it is you're smoking.

Do I have to remind you... again? *sigh*

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth

The Bible begins before the world or mankind was even created so how can it be based on some false dogma that came after the world was formed? You are embarrassing yourself, Missy. Clearly your false pagan conjectures are stolen from God's word and not the other way around. Check and mate!!!

Oh, yes, I forgot, the whole 'pre-stolen' idea. You really are a laugh!

A descendant of convicts WOULD be the one to justify criminal behavior. old What next? It's OK for nigra to rape white women because they need to satisfy their desire to be with a beautiful woman?

Rape is not ok regardless of who is committing the crime. No one should rape ANYONE. EVER.

Attachment 2119

How did this picture get taken if they recently went extinct?

That's a human being, not a neanderthal! You're sick!

I've already refuted your argument. Your turn. Follow the instructions I gave you. Ask your father for help if you need it. We don't want that weak female brain to fail on you in your time of need.

You need to stop replying the lazy way.
Oh, wait, I forgot. Men can't multi-task. That's why you do it the lazy way.

So when you get home, will it be your husband

He knows I don't need to ask anyone's help on this. I can manage perfectly fine. But seeing as I'm very busy at work, it doesn't give me much chance to write a proper reply.

or your father who you ask for help?

Why would I ask someone for help who I don't see all that often?

You really resent people who still have some of their own teeth, don't you?

Bwahaha. I knew I was right!

Care to provide evidence for your PAGAN deities? And if Pagan Jesus, or whoever you worship, is so brilliant, how come he didn't create the Earth? Is he weak, or just lazy?

Irrelevant to this argument. I'm merely stating what I believe. I'm not stating any theories of creation which involve my deities saying 'let there be light!' you're the one claiming such things, not me, therefore the burden of proof is on you.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Now, I notice you fail to provide proof once more.

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness

There you go. Check and Mate!!!

We're still waiting for your end of the deal, sinner.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! What a self-absorbed clod!
I'm currently at work and extremely busy, but when I get home I will reply to your idiocy.

So when you get home, will it be your husband or your father who you ask for help?

And you say I need to be taught how to debate. I'm guessing you're one of those twenty-nothing year olds who thinks you know everything, right?

You really resent people who still have some of their own teeth, don't you?

For crying out loud.

I am NOT an atheist. And atheist is someone who believes neither in the supernatural nor in deities. I believe in both. I just do not believe in the biblical god or jesus, nor in biblical creation. I am a PAGAN. Need a spelling lesson? P-A-G-A-N.

Care to provide evidence for your PAGAN deities? And if Pagan Jesus, or whoever you worship, is so brilliant, how come he didn't create the Earth? Is he weak, or just lazy?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Liberals think that everything else is 675 gazillion years old, so why not cameras too?

THIS is a good example of what you're talking about, sister. I'm still waiting for an explanation!

A fossilized hammer was found in a formation famous for its dinosaurs, supposed to be 140 million years old (lower cretaceous).

Max Han was fishing with his family near London, TX when he found a rock with wood protruding from it. When the rock was cracked open, this octagonally shaped iron hammer was exposed.

The wood handle is partially coalifed with quartz and calcite crystalline inclusions. Tests performed at Battelle Laboratory document the hammer’s unusual metallurgy, 96% iron, 2.6% chlorine and .74% sulfur (no carbon). Density test indicate casting of exceptional quality. A unique coating of FeO, which does not readily form under present atmospheric conditions, appears to inhibit rusting.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

For crying out loud.

I am NOT an atheist. And atheist is someone who believes neither in the supernatural nor in deities. I believe in both. I just do not believe in the biblical god or jesus, nor in biblical creation. I am a PAGAN. Need a spelling lesson? P-A-G-A-N.

Now, I notice you fail to provide proof once more.
It is you who have flipped out, knowing the burden of proof is on you, mr yo-yo fetish.

I have told you that I will reply in more depth once I leave work. But right now I have to deal with customers who are even more annoying than you, believe it or not.

And you proved me right about your being an egotistical 20-nothing year old who thinks you know everything. I think I win, Remy Le Pwned.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Bible (TRUE) Age of Earth

Liberals think that everything else is 675 gazillion years old, so why not cameras too?

They have old tools and human footprints dated at millions and billions of years old. Go figure.

Look at Van Hellbound's last post. Now she's completely flipped out with all her laughing and gibberish. I told her that a woman's brain simply cannot handle this kind of activity, but she will not listen. She's finally snapped when faced with the realization that she has lost yet again. Reminds me of one of those mental ward inmates. I guess you'd have to be a crazy person to be an atheist and a pagan to begin with.

Alas, it's a sad attempt to divert attention away from the fact that she is losing this debate.