X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • True Disciple
    True Christian™ Creation Scientist
    Landover Baptist University Associate Professor
    Smashing atheist science one fact at a time
    True Christian™
    • Nov 2009
    • 2445

    #31
    Re: follow on video

    Originally posted by :(diversity): View Post
    And if you knew anything about REAL science, you would know that there were civilization that are older than 10,000 years old.
    Why are you stupid?

    You might want to read this article, typed by Godly Brother David J Stewart, over at Jesus-is-Saviour.com, who effectively destroys your silly argument:

    THE OLDEST PEOPLE

    They do not go back before c. 3000 B.C., and were located in Mesopotamia.
    The various radiodating techniques could be so inaccurate that mankind has only been on earth a few thousand years.
    "Dates determined by radioactive decay may be off—not only by a few years, but by orders of magnitude . . Man, instead of having walked the earth for 3.6 million years, may have been around for only a few thousand."—*Robert Gannon, "How Old Is It?" Popular Science, November 1979, p. 81.
    We have no records indicating human civilization going back beyond a few thousand years.
    "Only six or seven thousand years ago . . civilization emerged, enabling us to build up a human world."—*Jonathan Schell, The Fate of the Earth (1982), p. 181.
    There are no written records before about 3000 B.C.
    "In the Old World, most of the critical steps in the farming revolution were taken between 1000 and 5000 B.C. . . Only for the last 5000 years has man left written records."—*Reader's Digest, the Last Two Million Years (1984), pp. 9, 29.
    Almost as soon as there was civilization, there were towns and cities, and the oldest were in Mesopotamia.
    "In most civilizations, urbanization began early. There is little doubt that this was the case for the oldest civilization and the earliest cities: those of ancient Mesopotamia."—*Robert M. Adam, "The Origin of Cities," Scientific American, Vol. 203, September 1960, p. 154.
    The earliest king lists only go back to shortly before 3000 B.C.
    "The Egyptian king lists go back to the First Dynasty of Egypt, and little before 3000 B.C. Before that, there were no written records anywhere."—*Colin Renfrew, Before Civilization (1983), p. 25.
    Sweet Lord Jesus,
    I want to pray for those who persecute me, my Lord.
    Please, treat their children as you treated those of Egypt, when they upset you! (Psalm 135:8-9)
    Dash their little children against the stones for their fathers iniquity! (Psalm 137:8-9)
    Hit them on the cheek, and smash out their teeth! (Psalm 3:7)
    Make their death and descent into Hell swift and terrible! (Psalm 55:15)
    Scatter their broken bodies over the streets of their evil cities, like Benghazi, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Mecca! (Psalm 110:6)
    Praised be Your Glorious Name™.

    Amen.

    Comment

    • :(diversity):
      Confirmed Enemy of God
      • Jan 2010
      • 45

      #32
      Re: follow on video

      Originally posted by True Disciple View Post
      Why are you stupid?

      You might want to read this article, typed by Godly Brother David J Stewart, over at Jesus-is-Saviour.com, who effectively destroys your silly argument:

      [/I] [/FONT]

      Nope, sir. You're the stupid one. The Ubaid period is apart of Mesopotamian history. It dates back to 5300 B.C. That's about 7,000 years, no? Earth is older than Six thousand years.

      Comment

      • :(diversity):
        Confirmed Enemy of God
        • Jan 2010
        • 45

        #33
        Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

        Also, the Archeozoic Era was dated back to 2 billion years ago...There is no way possible that the earth is a mere 6000 years old.

        Comment

        • True Disciple
          True Christian™ Creation Scientist
          Landover Baptist University Associate Professor
          Smashing atheist science one fact at a time
          True Christian™
          • Nov 2009
          • 2445

          #34
          Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

          Originally posted by :(diversity): View Post
          Nope, sir. You're the stupid one. The Ubaid period is apart of Mesopotamian history. It dates back to 5300 B.C. That's about 7,000 years, no? Earth is older than Six thousand years.
          Don't talk nonsense. The Ubaid Period is dated no doubt using Carbon-14 dating, which among True Christians(tm) is known for its unreliability.

          Originally posted by :(diversity): View Post
          Also, the Archeozoic Era was dated back to 2 billion years ago...There is no way possible that the earth is a mere 6000 years old.
          1. That age is acquired using radiometric dating. This, however, is a lie, as it consists of asking atoms how old the earth is. I'm not making this up, it really is that stupid.
          How could atoms know the age of the earth? They're just atoms! They don't know anything!
          2. You might want to make yourself familiar with your own Godless, silly theories, which teach that there is no "Archaeozoic" Era, but only a "Proterozoic" and an "Archaean" one. Though, of course, therse ages are an illusion, so you are not lying more when you redefine these.
          Sweet Lord Jesus,
          I want to pray for those who persecute me, my Lord.
          Please, treat their children as you treated those of Egypt, when they upset you! (Psalm 135:8-9)
          Dash their little children against the stones for their fathers iniquity! (Psalm 137:8-9)
          Hit them on the cheek, and smash out their teeth! (Psalm 3:7)
          Make their death and descent into Hell swift and terrible! (Psalm 55:15)
          Scatter their broken bodies over the streets of their evil cities, like Benghazi, Amsterdam, Tokyo and Mecca! (Psalm 110:6)
          Praised be Your Glorious Name™.

          Amen.

          Comment

          • SUV
            True Christian™ Princess
            The Driving Force behind RA12
            Have at it, anytime!
            • Sep 2006
            • 11027

            #35
            Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

            Originally posted by Petal View Post
            peanut baby bunnys
            Sister Dora Denkins, God Bless her Filthy Soul, must have read this thread because she couldn't wait 'til Easter this year to begin her Avalanche of Bunnies onto my Christian front porch. Sometimes I even Wonder if she might be behind instigating RA10....

            Would anyone Care to adopt this one? After increasing my Tithe, I find I can no longer afford to keep him in peanut Butter

            Comment

            • Aristotle
              On the straight and narrow path to Heaven.
              True Christian™
              • Nov 2009
              • 470

              #36
              Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

              Originally posted by True Disciple View Post
              Don't talk nonsense. The Ubaid Period is dated no doubt using Carbon-14 dating, which among True Christians™ is known for its unreliability.



              1. That age is acquired using radiometric dating. This, however, is a lie, as it consists of asking atoms how old the earth is. I'm not making this up, it really is that stupid.
              How could atoms know the age of the earth? They're just atoms! They don't know anything!
              2. You might want to make yourself familiar with your own Godless, silly theories, which teach that there is no "Archaeozoic" Era, but only a "Proterozoic" and an "Archaean" one. Though, of course, therse ages are an illusion, so you are not lying more when you redefine these.
              I always find it amazing that these 'liberals' will believe somebody in a white coat who tells him that these carbon dating instruments 'talk' with atoms while rejecting the BIBLE(KJV) where he can have Jesus talk to him.

              Comment

              • DaveTheRave
                Unsaved trash
                 
                • Feb 2010
                • 26

                #37
                Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

                Originally posted by Paper_Cut View Post
                The formation of life required oxygen, there isn't any oxygen in a sealed bottle of peanut butter.
                Are you equating God with oxygen?

                Are you saying oxygen is The Fifth Day?

                Evolution says that life made oxygen, so how did the birds breathe when they were created? Were they anaerobic?

                There is air in a jar of peanut butter, some scientists claim there to be oxygen in air. Do you deny this?

                Comment

                • Aristotle
                  On the straight and narrow path to Heaven.
                  True Christian™
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 470

                  #38
                  Re: peanut butters prove that evilution not true

                  Originally posted by DaveTheRave View Post
                  Are you equating God with oxygen?

                  Are you saying oxygen is The Fifth Day?

                  Evolution says that life made oxygen, so how did the birds breathe when they were created? Were they anaerobic?

                  There is air in a jar of peanut butter, some scientists claim there to be oxygen in air. Do you deny this?
                  There is no mortal life in peanut butter, unless the jar is contaminated from the outside. Only GOD can create such life. However, there could be demons, who can live in anaerobic conditions like up the behind and in ocean deep-sea vents.

                  Comment

                  Working...