Originally posted by Geotraveler990
View Post
Brother James himself decides if he talks with you. In addition, you're employing an ex silentio fallacy.
I'll try to explain this to you: The validity of Brother James's claims is not in the slightest dependent on his answering your emotional tantrums. His license is valid regardless of his answer or the absence of his answer. You cannot make conclusions based on material that is not available for you. This protects also you from uncanny accusations in secular law. All you have is an unfounded opinion and some innuendo.
Of course, in the eyes of God we are all guilty (Genesis 3:6) but in the material world, secular logic does have its place. This tendency of yours to use the ex silentio and unfounded accusations is a great risk and I sincerely suggest you be more careful in the future.
Proverbs 19:5
A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.
Yours in Christ,
Elmer
@ Didymus Much....demagogue



Leave a comment: