[James Hutchins]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

I see. 'Gravity' pulls things together. Like the moon and the sun to the Earth?

I have a masters in Organic Chemistry from Princeton., Tell me, what is your masters in?

God and the Bible are 100% accurate. There is no twisting of the Truth as in 'theories'.
Tell me, which is more accurate. A guess or a fact? Fail to respond truthfully and accurately confirms you are admitting you are completely wrong about everything.

People get banned for not following the rules, such as:
Porn
Potty mouth (this fits you)
Lying
Really poor spelling and writing (this fits you)
Being under age (this fits you)
Having Zero intelligence(You are almost there on this one)

[New Creation (Recalcitrant)]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

You don't understand gravity at all it doesn't just pull down it pulls objects together so no matter where you are the pull of gravity is the same on a spherical earth. Also you are not a scientist so you don't know how we opperate, we seek the truth about the universe not matter how much it distorts our orginal predictions. You howeer simply scrape the bottum of the barrel for evidence that proves that you are right. Scientist hypothesis are not always riht so they prefect them into theories. Finally kicking me off will simply prove by prediction that you guys are not open to new ideas so do it if you want, then we'll see whos right.

Friend it seems that you were "educated" in a liberal public school. Is that right? Perhaps you will find this thread useful. Please read it (all of it) and check back with us.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

You people use your minds and open your eyes the bible is written in metaphors it's not atext book so stop taking it to such extremes.

Where does it say that the Bible is written in metaphors? We know that Jesus spoke in parables and he made that clear but I see no metaphors. It seems to me that weak Christians would rather believe science so come up with this metaphor rubbish.

All of the following 'science' says can't happen,

Creation in six days,
Parting of the Red Sea,
A virgin birth,
Water into wine,
Walking on water,
Bringing the dead back to life,
Being cured of disease by touching a handkerchief,
Being resurrected after three days of death.

PLEASE tell me which are metaphors. If you follow 'science' as you say you do then you must believe ALL of the above to be impossible? How can you call yourself a Christian?? If you throw one out you may as well throw it all out.

YiC

Jack

[James Hutchins]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Oh well, it seems he ran away when unable to provide his proofs.

Typical God hater. First the potty mouth, then the lies, then the bravado of daring us to ban him at which point they always run away. So typical. This must happen several times a day.

[New Creation (Recalcitrant)]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Oh well, it seems he ran away when unable to provide his proofs.

Typical God hater. First the potty mouth, then the lies, then the bravado of daring us to ban him at which point they always run away. So typical. This must happen several times a day.

It would be great it there was a bot on this forum that automatically replied to a post with three or more profane words, directing them to a thread replete with replies to all of an atheists typical questions. That way we don't ahve to read and deal with all the typical atheist crap.

[Scientistic Fool]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

I didnt run away at all i'm still very much here. So don't go trying to insult me. Doesn't this bible of your's teach you how to respect people obviously not. I do not hate god i just don't believe in him. But don't think for a second that i am unfaithful, scientist are very faithful. I know that tomarrow that we will still be in orbit around the sun because it gravitational influence remains the same. I'm faithful that if i fall ill the proper vaccination will cure me. So don't go getting the wrong idea. I joined this site to throw in a fresh perspective but i can see that you're all to narrow minded to even give my ideas a chance.

[Scientistic Fool]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Dear James,
I seriously doubt that you have a masters degree from princton in organic chemistry for several reasons. One any one with that sort of education would not waste there time with this sort of crap. Two, you also claim to have worked on wall street where having such an education would be useless. Finally organic chemistry is the study of molecular stucters consisting of carbon of which us humans are made, however i have seen comments on this site that claim humans are not made of chemicals. If you really had such a degree you would disagree with everything on this site.

[James Hutchins]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

I have a double Masters. One in Organic Chemistry, the other in Business/Finance. My Pastor suggested I study a 'science' to be more comfortable with and knowledgeable about God.
See son, To understand a subject, you have to actually study it. You cannot make it up as you go, you get caught in lies like you have. Just because I have a degree, does not mean I agree. It only means I read and understood what they were teaching. Of course it was all poppycock and nonsense. I know that now more than ever.
Another failing of yours is to think that knowledge is pointless. Knowledge is not about knowing the answer, it is about getting the answer and that is really what you are supposed to be learning. I found all the answers in the Bible. From what I can tell, you are puling them from your rectum.

You never responded to this (except where you tried to find fault with my education-Laughable coming from you.)

I see. 'Gravity' pulls things together. Like the moon and the sun to the Earth?

I have a masters in Organic Chemistry from Princeton., Tell me, what is your masters in?

God and the Bible are 100% accurate. There is no twisting of the Truth as in 'theories'.
Tell me, which is more accurate. A guess or a fact? Fail to respond truthfully and accurately confirms you are admitting you are completely wrong about everything.

[James Hutchins]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Again, he ran away. He will probably return after I am in bed at 9pm

[Scientistic Fool]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Actually i was just riding home from the university where i work i'm not going anywhere and i do see your point of studying things before you understand them, however i believed the things i was taught because i have an open mind. It's ok to be a skeptic but not buying into to basic scientific fact is just lying to yourself.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Actually i was just riding home from the university where i work i'm not going anywhere and i do see your point of studying things before you understand them, however i believed the things i was taught because i have an open mind. It's ok to be a skeptic but not buying into to basic scientific fact is just lying to yourself.

Look, as a Christian there is no way I am just going to believe something because some old guy declared himself the expert on everything and then wrote it down in a book!

Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence. Were is this extraordinary evidence for "science" that it trumps Biblical knowledge?

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

I didnt run away at all i'm still very much here. So don't go trying to insult me. Doesn't this bible of your's teach you how to respect people obviously not. I do not hate god i just don't believe in him. But don't think for a second that i am unfaithful, scientist are very faithful. I know that tomarrow that we will still be in orbit around the sun because it gravitational influence remains the same. I'm faithful that if i fall ill the proper vaccination will cure me. So don't go getting the wrong idea. I joined this site to throw in a fresh perspective but i can see that you're all to narrow minded to even give my ideas a chance.

At least you admit that all science is based on mere faith. You have your faith and we have ours. It's that simple, really. You believe in evidence, and we believe in the Bible. The only difference is that your faith will land you in Hell, and our faith will guarantee us a place in Heaven!

[Alvin]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Actually i was just riding home from the university where i work i'm not going anywhere and i do see your point of studying things before you understand them, however i believed the things i was taught because i have an open mind.

Let me make sure I understand your reasoning here: You believe the scientific dogma you were TAUGHT from the pulpit (rather than any conclusions you have arrived at yourself through observation with your own, God-given senses), because you have an "open mind"? If you had an open mind, you would question the authority, tradition, expertise and motive of those who are trying to indoctrinate you with their false scripture. I'm afraid you have gotten the idea of an "open mind" backwards.



Matthew 7:15
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

It's ok to be a skeptic but not buying into to basic scientific fact is just lying to yourself.

Aehm... I'll bite: What is a "basic scientific fact" that your "science" teaches you you may not be skeptical about? Have you ever asked why you think it's OK to skeptical about other people's beliefs but not your own? Don't you realize that only those who are trying to sell lies to you have any motive to prevent you from asking difficult questions?

If secular science were actually true, it would need no "dogma", no "basic scientific facts" which for some reason you are not allowed to question.

QED.

PS: You say you work at a university... I can only pray that you are not part of faculty and teaching this nonsense to any unprepared young minds.

YiC,

Alvin

[Alvin]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Did you graduate from the second grade, you obviously know absolutly nothing about science. You can't claim scientist are lying or don't know what they're doing because scientist made the very technology that allows you to be on a computer. You can see micro organisms i have SEEN them through a mircoscoope there is nothing to beleive or not they are there end of story. Same goes for DNA. Also stars distances can be very acturatly measured with techniques you know nothing about. Nuclear decay of the nuclius of atoms is how geologist use date rock and it WORKS! Take a science class before you make ridiculous accusations. Dumbass!

It would seem that you are so aggressive because someone has called your dogma into question. You may have seen little specks through a microscope and believe them to be microorganisms.

But :
1. you have not seen DNA with your own eyes (even if it existed, it would be much too small to see through an optical microscope at a the level to identify the claimed double helix)
2. You have no idea if carbon dating works - because you have no way to calibrate it without going back millions of years. Instead, you place blind faith in a scientific model - and we all know how wrong scientists can be about their models, before they are inevitably shown the light (like Galileo) or the warmth (like Bruno) by their more enlightened Christian contemporaries.

Can you please tell me which "science class" teaches you to believe dogma without questioning it?



YiC,

Alvin

[Scientistic Fool]

Re: A guide to the evolutionist conspiracy

Dear Alvin,
I understand you perspective, but i was raised christan and was shown the way of god however when I found science i was truly enlightened. If you've ever looked through a telescope at at distant world you can know the some true about the universe. Also if scientist were mistaken in their discoveries then we wouldn't have computers or i pods, so just because it doesn't have a practical application to your life doesn't mean that it's not wrong. And yes the university i do research for teaches the evidence that scientist uncover, and provides me nearly unlimited access to the technology and instruments that are used to discover. When you really look at their methods it gives you more of an idea of how they come up with their conclusions. In addition you guys use the excuse of photoshop and other things to explain away what you are being shown by scientist and my professor who is 87 said he saw microorganisms and other things before their were computers.