[Peter]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Well said Brother, Amen.

I've always been puzzled by this "carbon dating" nonsense. The monkey worshiping scientists claim there was billions and billions of pounds more carbon on earth 3.5 billion years ago. Now as I understand it, these same scientists claim that all humans, animals, bugs and plants are basically made out of carbon. So are they saying that there were more humans, animals, bugs and plants way back then, than there are now?

I think I've caught them in another lie.

The half-life of a certain element is always related to isotopes. In this case the carbon-14 isotope. All living beings are made out of organic molecules (molecules with carbon, hydrogen and some other elements like oxygen,...). The organic molecules don't contain carbon-14 isotopes.

btw: Carbon-14 is radioactive, so if the organic molecules would contain carbon-14, we would all die of the effects of radiation.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

The half-life of a certain element is always related to isotopes. In this case the carbon-14 isotope. All living beings are made out of organic molecules (molecules with carbon, hydrogen and some other elements like oxygen,...). The organic molecules don't contain carbon-14 isotopes.

btw: Carbon-14 is radioactive, so if the organic molecules would contain carbon-14, we would all die of the effects of radiation.

You date things with carbon paper? And you guys complain about us Christians believing in magic.

[Brother V]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

btw: Carbon-14 is radioactive, so if the organic molecules would contain carbon-14, we would all die of the effects of radiation.

So, if I read that correctly; you just said that no living thing contains carbon-14.

Except, "carbon dating" is done by comparing the amount of carbon-14 in (what used to be a living thing) and determining when it stopped taking that in.

So, you claim science=truth, but yet, you don't speak the truth, therefore, you don't speak science.

Thou speakest out of thine hind quarters.

YIC
V

[Nirvash]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

How ridiculous! Saying that God didn't make something out of nothing. Carbon paper wasn't even invented until 1806! How can they possibly argue their case?

Well, as they say, sinners are a confederacy of dunces.

Carbon based and what does this have to do with Carbon paper?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Carbon based and what does this have to do with Carbon paper?

Oh now its quibbling over the semantics, is it? Face it, you theory is full of holes.

[Andrew Barrick]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Isn't it interesting that the Bible predicted all of your "science" before you did?

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

All living beings are made out of organic molecules (molecules with carbon, hydrogen and some other elements like oxygen,...).

If we humans are made out of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen..
Why don't we explode when we're set on fire?

Because you would have all the parts needed there:
An oxidizer (oxygen) and combustibles. (hydrogen & carbon)

But I know for a fact that if you set a witch alight, they don't explode, they only burn.
Even if you wrap them really hard in cardboard before you set them alight, as you would gunpowder -
Still no explosion.


Although you may be on to something in small part here:
As Creation scientists has determined that God created arabs out of soil that is possibly related to gunpowder.
(And gunpowder is made up of carbon, oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen and potassium)

Hydrogen is more explosive than all of those elements, however.
Thus: If humans were made out of oxygen, hydrogen and carbon..
We'd be very prone to explode whenever fire is nearby. But are we? No.

Yet more falsely so-called 'science' nonsense lies spouted by you silly atehists.

[Nirvash]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

If we humans are made out of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen..
Why don't we explode when we're set on fire?

Because you would have all the parts needed there:
An oxidizer (oxygen) and combustibles. (hydrogen & carbon)

But I know for a fact that if you set a witch alight, they don't explode, they only burn.
Even if you wrap them really hard in cardboard before you set them alight, as you would gunpowder -
Still no explosion.


Although you may be on to something in small part here:
As Creation scientists has determined that God created arabs out of soil that is possibly related to gunpowder.
(And gunpowder is made up of carbon, oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen and potassium)

Hydrogen is more explosive than all of those elements, however.
Thus: If humans were made out of oxygen, hydrogen and carbon..
We'd be very prone to explode whenever fire is nearby. But are we? No.

Yet more falsely so-called 'science' nonsense lies spouted by you silly atehists.

We are made out of alot more elements that do not let some reactions to happen.

[Sister Noddy]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

We are made out of alot more elements that do not let some reactions to happen.

And you are made up of a lot of scientific babble that doesn't make sense, for it is written ...

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

After all, who would know more about science than GOD himself, who created all things? Time to get with the program and get the real Biblical Truth™, Nervish!

Let the Bible do your thinking for you! Sister Noddy

[Buford T Scoggins]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

I can't even balance a checkbook, so that has to be right!

Don't feel bad sister - no one expects a woman to be able to do math. Leave complex problems to us men. Besides, women have too many other important functions in society - like cooking, cleaning and child bearing.

I'd like to take this time to extend you a complement - I've heard that you bake excellent angelfood cake.

YIC,
Buford

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

We are made out of alot more elements that do not let some reactions to happen.

Really?
Not according to science.. But maybe they've changed the theories yet again?
Well then, oh great scientific vanguard of the spelling impaired..
What other elements are we also made of?

Potassium? Sodium? Magnesium? Sulfur? Chlorine? Uranium maybe?
Oh, and would you mind reminding me of how many times you've changed the number of elements there is?

[Pastor Billy-Reuben]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Oh, and would you mind reminding me of how many times you've changed the number of elements there is?

What I want to know about is all of these man-made "elements", with liberal-bias names like Berkeley-ium, Californa-ium, and Europe-ium. How can they be elements if they are man-made?

Scientists are stupid.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

[Peter]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

What I want to know about is all of these man-made "elements", with liberal-bias names like Berkeley-ium, Californa-ium, and Europe-ium. How can they be elements if they are man-made?

Scientists are stupid.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

Atoms can be created by the fusion of two nuclei.

[Brother V]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

Atoms can be created by the fusion of two nuclei.

Dear friend,

It's the periodic table of the elements, not the periodic table of the atoms.

YIC
V

[G-Baby]

Re: Proof of a Young Earth

you don't speak the truth, therefore, you don't speak science.

Thanks dude!!

You've just said that science is the truth!!

You're getting higher in my regard..