[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

You have no idea.

The false science of cosmology claims that "the gravitational field" at the centre of the sun is zero.

The origin of the mass associated with that gravitational field is an interaction between certain subatomic particles and some abstruse field of dubious provenance those wretches claim.

Approaching the centre of the sun, the gravity gets weaker and weaker, not stronger and stronger the fools assert and point to the surface gravity of Jupiter as an example of the internal inconsittancies of their "theories" such as we know them to be.

If the "science" you propose were true, how would you explain the phase transition during the early inflationary epoch of creation @ approx. 1,000 trillion degrees after which the relevant field might exist to engender mass and therefore gravity (or are you suggesting that gravity causes mass)?

And then although you junk science you say junk floats and God is wrong??

Genesis 1:6 or do you claim the sun floats on hot air.

The gravitation of the center of every objects mass is infinite but in most cases this infinite force decreases dramatically after a few nanometers due to the radius of the object being big comapared to its mass.
Earth has very big mass and therefore its gravity can be observed. suns gravity on the other hand keeps increasing due to the pressurized matter

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Gravity

The gravitation of the center of every objects mass is infinite but in most cases this infinite force decreases dramatically after a few nanometers due to the radius of the object being big comapared to its mass.
Earth has very big mass and therefore its gravity can be observed. suns gravity on the other hand keeps increasing due to the pressurized matter

You haven't got the slightest clue what you are on about, have you. Stop making stuff up to sound clever because you assume we know nothing of physics and its false teachings.

It's clear you are a person unused to having the imaginary twaddle in your brain challenged. Out here we deal with evidence, not what you would like to be true.

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

You haven't got the slightest clue what you are on about, have you. Stop making stuff up to sound clever because you assume we know nothing of physics and its false teachings.

It's clear you are a person unused to having the imaginary twaddle in your brain challenged. Out here we deal with evidence, not what you would like to be true.

for the fusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS1dpowPlE8
and for the gravity:
http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae253.cfm

[Didymus Much]

Re: Gravity

earth is bound to sun which is floating on the empty space(space has no gravity so everything floats)...

Ow, please stop, you're making my brain hurt.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Gravity

Tell you what, Buck Rogers: go to a regular astrophysics forum and tell them the Sun is "floating" in space, OK?



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Gravity

for the fusion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS1dpowPlE8

and for the gravity:
http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae253.cfm

There is nothing on that page about how the center of a star has no gravitational field.

Nothing.

This part was a bit confusing, though:

Stars greater than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun (called the Chandrasekhar limit after the Indian physicist who discovered it on his way to England) will tend to explode in a supernova casting off much of their mass.

How did he discover it on his way to England? Did someone drop it by the side of the road? Did he notice it caught between the seat cushions on the train?

Was that page written by a child?

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

There is nothing on that page about how the center of a star has no gravitational field.

Nothing.

This part was a bit confusing, though:



How did he discover it on his way to England? Did someone drop it by the side of the road? Did he notice it caught between the seat cushions on the train?

Was that page written by a child?

i said the center of a star has INFINITE gravitational field
because a factor that determines gravity is mass/radius so if radius=0 in the case of the center of the sun that means mass( and therefore gravity) is infinite but as we are getting further from the center the radius increaces and gravity decreases

he discovered it by observation

here's another video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_o4a...feature=relmfu

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Gravity

i said the center of a star has INFINITE gravitational field
because a factor that determines gravity is mass/radius so if radius=0 in the case of the center of the sun that means mass( and therefore gravity) is infinite but as we are getting further from the center the radius increaces and gravity decreases

Yes, you did. It was Ms. Mitza who said that the cosmologists say there is no gravity in the center. We will have to ask her for a reference.

he discovered it by observation

HOW? How did he observe that stars greater than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun tend to explode, as he was traveling to England?

Did he look at them through a telescope through the sunroof of his car?

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

Tell you what, Buck Rogers: go to a regular astrophysics forum and tell them the Sun is "floating" in space, OK?



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

there is no up down left or right in space so everything hovers on it
(i thought float and hover mean the same thing)

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Gravity

there is no up down left or right in space so everything hovers on it
(i thought float and hover mean the same thing)

.

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

Yes, you did. It was Ms. Mitza who said that the cosmologists say there is no gravity in the center. We will have to ask her for a reference.


HOW? How did he observe that stars greater than 1.4 times the mass of the Sun tend to explode, as he was traveling to England?

Did he look at them through a telescope through the sunroof of his car?

by the way they function

[Didymus Much]

Re: Gravity

i said the center of a star has INFINITE gravitational field...

I thought I politely asked you to stop hurting my brain with your extremely poor understanding of gravity (and science in general)?

If the center of a star had an INFINITE gravitational field, then every particle would have infinite weight.

Let's take the example of a particle one atomic radius from the center of a star. That means that 50.0000000...0000001% of the mass of the star is pulling it towards the center, and 49.99999999...999999% (the rest of star further away from the center yet still on the same side of the center as the particle) is pulling it away from the center. As these forces would very nearly counteract each other, they in essence cancel each other out, and the particle weighs next to nothing.

Stay in school.

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

I thought I politely asked you to stop hurting my brain with your extremely poor understanding of gravity (and science in general)?

If the center of a star had an INFINITE gravitational field, then every particle would have infinite weight.

Let's take the example of a particle one atomic radius from the center of a star. That means that 50.0000000...0000001% of the mass of the star is pulling it towards the center, and 49.99999999...999999% (the rest of star further away from the center yet still on the same side of the center as the particle) is pulling it away from the center. As these forces would very nearly counteract each other, they in essence cancel each other out, and the particle weighs next to nothing.

Stay in school.

the area that has infinite mass is so small that it is insignificant.
also i have a bachelor in Chemistry and i work in the state laboratory of turkey

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Gravity

by the way they function

How did he observe the way they function while traveling to England?

[KarasuFarishe]

Re: Gravity

How did he observe the way they function while traveling to England?

you don't need tools to make astronomical observations. Mayans made a perfect calendar just by looking the stars at night