[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Yes quite right, Octogons Razor, stick to the simple solution and you can't go too far wrong.

YiC

Jack

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Well, they were quite obviously in the pouch, as the Kangarosaurus was a herbivore it may well have transported other friendly animals around. They may have had some kind of symbiotic relationship.

Or maybe the Kangarosaurus was trying to escape from the Flood water and tried to help some of his animal friends escape as well. Even a Kangarosaurus wouldn't have been able to bounce away from the Flood water, especially when fully loaded. That would explain why they were all found together. Totally feasible.

YiC

Jack

Well this is where I would have to kindly disagree with you because the remains are found in the chest cavity where the stomach would be. If they had a pouch the remains would have been found farther down in the lower abdomen. And the bones found in the chest cavity had evidence of teeth marks and many were broken but there was no sign of damage on the T-Rex.

[Pure_Angel]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Well this is where I would have to kindly disagree with you because the remains are found in the chest cavity where the stomach would be. If they had a pouch the remains would have been found farther down in the lower abdomen. And the bones found in the chest cavity had evidence of teeth marks and many were broken but there was no sign of damage on the T-Rex.

Brother Jack is a True Christian™! Therefore everything he say is more true than anything that you or I say, so please don't argue against him. You should look up to him, and all the other True Christian™ men (and ladies) at this forum.

YIC
Elisabeth

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

I do respect him. But he is also a man and the only man I answer to is the big guy upstairs.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Well this is where I would have to kindly disagree with you because the remains are found in the chest cavity where the stomach would be. If they had a pouch the remains would have been found farther down in the lower abdomen. And the bones found in the chest cavity had evidence of teeth marks and many were broken but there was no sign of damage on the T-Rex.

Well, the position of the smaller animals could easily look as if it was further up depending on the angle that Kangarosaurus fell. Also the Dr is only saying that the Kangarosaurus was a herbivore, not that it's passengers were. As the floods engulfed the Kangarosaurus and it died (probably by being covered by mud), the contents of it's pouch would have been protected. They may have survived for many days, in the end hunger would have got to them and they would have started to devour each other.This would explain the teeth marks and broken bones you speak of.

Thank you Pure Angel for your kind comments,

YiC

Jack

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

But what doesn't make sense is that the broken bones were from incomplete animals that would have been to large to fit in the pouch. Many times only a partial animal was found in the stomach.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

How do phantom kangaroo sightings play into all this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_kangaroo

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

But what doesn't make sense is that the broken bones were from incomplete animals that would have been to large to fit in the pouch. Many times only a partial animal was found in the stomach.

Well as I said, the passengers may have been carnivores and therefore would have taken food with them for a long journey. Imagine if you will a smaller animal, maybe a dingo sat in the Kangarosaurus pouch, the dingo is chewing on part of a mammoth leg that it brought for the trip. It would be sitting up high in the pouch (as dogs do in cars these days, they love to see where they are going). This would explain the odd chewed larger bone, it also explains the higher position in the abdomen. As you can see, totally credible,

YiC

Jack

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

With no disrespect towards you, I don't believe the animals were that intelligent back then to carry food with them. And i'm having a hard time beliving that a small dingo could get a mammoth leg into the pouch.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

But what doesn't make sense is that the broken bones were from incomplete animals that would have been to large to fit in the pouch. Many times only a partial animal was found in the stomach.

Well, the owners of the Kangarosaurus must have used its pouch as a waste container. At least that sounds like the most logical explanation.

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Also there has never been a report of finding mammoth bones mixed with dinosaur bones.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

With no disrespect towards you, I don't believe the animals were that intelligent back then to carry food with them. And i'm having a hard time beliving that a small dingo could get a mammoth leg into the pouch.

No, he wouldn't have got the mammoth leg into the pouch, that is why he would have had his head sticking out of the top of the pouch with the leg in his mouth. Don't worry if you don't get all of it, sometimes when science is at the forefront and is pushing the boundaries of human knowledge it can be very difficult to follow.

YiC

Jack

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

No, he wouldn't have got the mammoth leg into the pouch, that is why he would have had his head sticking out of the top of the pouch with the leg in his mouth. Don't worry if you don't get all of it, sometimes when science is at the forefront and is pushing the boundaries of human knowledge it can be very difficult to follow.

YiC

Jack

It's still hard to believe that a dog could carry a mammoth leg in his mouth while traveling a long distance.

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Well, the owners of the Kangarosaurus must have used its pouch as a waste container. At least that sounds like the most logical explanation.

Also no disrespect towards you, but there has never been any evidence of humans coexisting with dinosaurs.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Also no disrespect towards you, but there has never been any evidence of humans coexisting with dinosaurs.

You don't consider God's word to be evidence?