Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Carbon Dating EXPOSED!
Dr. Isaiah Jones, Ph.D., Professor of Paleotheology and Biblical Archaeology

The Holy Bible (Authorized King James Version of 1611) is a historically accurate, factually inerrant record of the history of the world. It is also the sole indisputable source of all true scientific knowledge. How do we know this? The answer is simple. It says so in the Bible!

Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
Proverbs 30:6 Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.

2 Samuel 22:31 As for God, his way is perfect; the word of the LORD is tried: he is a buckler to all them that trust in him.

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

As the above passages prove, the Bible was written by God himself and because God wrote the Bible it is infallible. Secular scientists, however, have been planting doubts in the minds of the unsaved public by questioning its infallibility. Their favorite argument is the so-called carbon dating method which, by the means of True Science™, has been proven inaccurate and erroneous.

GOD HATES CARBON DATING!

First of all, Carbon dating is the offspring of secular science, and as we all know, God HATES secular science.

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

Secular scientists believe that rocks can be dated at "millions and millions of years" based on radiocarbon dating. The truth is, however, that Carbon-14 can not yield dates older than six thousand years before it all breaks down. The Bible supports this as I will show you in the following paragraphs.

Let's begin with the archaeological landmark event of the conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar II, King of Babylon in 588 B.C. If we count backwards the number of years between the fall of Jerusalem and the division of Solomon's kingdom (430 years, Ezekiel 4:4-7) it brings us even further back to the year of 1018 B.C.

King Solomon reigned over Israel for 40 years. From the end of his reign to the construction of the Temple in the fourth year of his reign takes us back another 37 years to 1055 B.C.

If we go from the start of Solomon's Temple in the 480th year (1 Kings 6:1) and back to the Exodus from Egypt (479 years) it brings us to c.a. 1534 B.C.

Now if we go from the Exodus to when the Israelites entered Canaan from Haran exactly 430 years prior (Genesis 12:10, Exodus 12:40, Galatians 3:17) it must have been around 1964 B.C.

Abraham entered Canaan at the age of 75 (Genesis 12:4) and thus he was born approximately in 2039 B.C.

Between the birth of Abraham to Shem's son, Arpachshad's birth, two years after the beginning of the Flood, 290 years passed (Gen 11:11-26). This gives us the conclusion that the Flood started around 2331 B.C. (about 4300 - 4400 years ago).

If we look at the genealogy of Genesis 5:3-32 it gives us c.a. 1656 years between the Flood and Creation. This tells us that God created the world around 3987 B.C. or approximately 4000 years B.C.

So you see folks, carbon dating is a lie invented by secular scientists to deceive the public. Let's not side with the devil and fall into their traps.

Yours sincerely in Christ,
Dr. Isaiah Jones, Ph.D.

[MisterM]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Problem with carbon dating is simple. It makes assumption that certain conditions have been for long long time. So if the two basic fact behind the theory is wrong, Age of earth and the development of the environment, the dating is pure crap. And as our Doctor has proven with Bible, both assumptions are nonsense. Earth is about 6000 years old and was made in days. That means that levels of carbon-14 can be what ever God wanted.

Those secular scientist are so pathetic. Their argument is that someone has written book saying Carbon dating say this, it proves that carbon dating is true and because carbon dating is true, book is true.

YiC,
Brother Miikkael

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Carbon dating doesn't just contradict God's laws, it also contradicts the laws of science. According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore, if all the carbon-14 in everything is constantly going in half, then half all the carbon-14 from everything must constantly be winding up somewhere else. Have you seen all this carbon-14 piling up everywhere? No. No-one has, and half of all the carbon-14 from everything would be a pretty noticeable site. Therefore, according to 100% true and accurate Christian science, either it's staying put or it never existed in the first place. Either way, it has nothing to do with dating anything or anyone.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Carbon dating doesn't just contradict God's laws, it also contradicts the laws of science. According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore, if all the carbon-14 in everything is constantly going in half, then half all the carbon-14 from everything must constantly be winding up somewhere else. Have you seen all this carbon-14 piling up everywhere? No. No-one has, and half of all the carbon-14 from everything would be a pretty noticeable site. Therefore, according to 100% true and accurate Christian science, either it's staying put or it never existed in the first place. Either way, it has nothing to do with dating anything or anyone.

Thank you for your input, Brother. It's incredible how these so-called scientists don't see the error in their ways. If one theory contradicts another, they either ignore it or make up a completely new theory in order to cover up their lies.

Thankfully for us True Scientists™ the Holy Bible does not contain any such contradictions.

[True Disciple]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Excellent teaching, Brother!

The difference between Biblical Chronology and atheist "Geochronology" is most accurately described thus:

True Christians™ ask the Almighty God, Creator of the Heavens and the Earth, how old the Earth is.
Atheists ask carbon atoms, who cannot think, feel, reason, believe or have consciousness, how old the Earth is.


Who would know it better, you think?

[Physics!]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Carbon dating doesn't just contradict God's laws, it also contradicts the laws of science. According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore, if all the carbon-14 in everything is constantly going in half, then half all the carbon-14 from everything must constantly be winding up somewhere else. Have you seen all this carbon-14 piling up everywhere? No. No-one has, and half of all the carbon-14 from everything would be a pretty noticeable site. Therefore, according to 100% true and accurate Christian science, either it's staying put or it never existed in the first place. Either way, it has nothing to do with dating anything or anyone.

The other half of the first law is that they may change form. For example, solid matter can melt into a liquid, which can then evaporate into a gas. As this happens, the matter will take some of the heat energy from it's surroundings.

With carbon-14 dating, the carbon-14 doesn't build up anywhere else. It's an unstable molecule, and constantly breaks down into nitrogen-14. The reason it's used for dating is because before death, an organism has a certain ratio of carbon-12 and carbon-14 molecules present because the organism gets a constant supply of carbon-14 from the surroundings (breathing in the atmosphere or eating plants or other animals that have it in their bodies). After death, the organism can't get any more carbon-14, so the ratio changes, which is why it can be used for dating.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

With carbon-14 dating, the carbon-14 doesn't build up anywhere else. It's an unstable molecule, and constantly breaks down into nitrogen-14.

Do you really expect us to believe that? In case you didn't know, one element magically transforming into another also contradicts the laws of science.

A biological transmutation is defined as a nuclear transmutation occurring in a living organism. Such transmutations are strongly believed not to occur according to mainstream physics, chemistry and biology

What is it with you atheists? You contradict your own logic in every sentence.

[Physics!]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Do you really expect us to believe that? In case you didn't know, one element magically transforming into another also contradicts the laws of science.

No magic is involved.

One of the Neutrons in Carbon-14 breaks apart into a Proton, an Electron, and an Electron Antineutrino.

What is it with you atheists? You contradict your own logic in every sentence.

The article that quote is from was talking about nuclear fusion and nuclear fission, neither of which is involved in the breakdown on Carbon-14.

Also, Wikipedia isn't a valid source.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

One of the Neutrons in Carbon-14 breaks apart into a Proton, an Electron, and an Electron Antineutrino.

The article that quote is from was talking about nuclear fusion and nuclear fission, neither of which is involved in the breakdown on Carbon-14.

You talked about carbon (C ) turning into nitrogen (N). These are two different elements and according to your so-called science a transmutation can not happen biologically, i.e. without nuclear fusion or fission.

Also, Wikipedia isn't a valid source.

Of course not.

[Physics!]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

You talked about carbon (Ca) turning into nitrogen (N). These are two different elements and according to your so-called science a transmutation can not happen biologically, i.e. without nuclear fusion or fission.

Ca is Calcium, C is Carbon.

Nuclear fusion and fission deal with the strong force, which is the force that holds protons and neutrons close to each other in a nucleus of an atom.

Radioactive decay, in the case of Carbon-14, deals with the weak force, which is the force that holds neutrons together. Turn one neutron into a proton in Carbon-14 and you get Nitrogen-14. It's entirely possible since this process does not take either intense heat or pressure.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Ca is Calcium, C is Carbon.

Sorry, that was a typo on my behalf.

Nuclear fusion and fission deal with the strong force, which is the force that holds protons and neutrons close to each other in a nucleus of an atom.

Radioactive decay, in the case of Carbon-14, deals with the weak force, which is the force that holds neutrons together. Turn one neutron into a proton in Carbon-14 and you get Nitrogen-14. It's entirely possible since this process does not take either intense heat or pressure.

Would you mind supporting this with scripture, please?

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

No magic is involved.

We cannot discount miracles.

The article that quote is from was talking about nuclear fusion and nuclear fission, neither of which is involved in the breakdown on Carbon-14.

Also, Wikipedia isn't a valid source. [/QUOTE]Look son, you seem to think that the word of some secular scientist can trump God's Word. Yet God, Patient and Merciful, allows scientists to see the error of their ways, and will continue to do so until they accept Jesus.

Radioactive decay is unreliable Scientists themselves say that it is not useful as a measuring tool. It's like trying to measure a foot with a piece of elastic.

[Physics!]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

Sorry, that was a typo on my behalf.

Ok.

Would you mind supporting this with scripture, please?

Scripture doesn't contain all of the knowledge in order to make a car work, yet we still have cars. Perhaps God wants us to figure out some of the things for ourselves?

We cannot discount miracles.

In science we have to, since science doesn't have a way to measure or detect God. By discounting them, it forces us to have to figure out a naturalistic way something happened, which is why we have things like electricity today.

Look son, you seem to think that the word of some secular scientist can trump God's Word.

I see them as having authority in two separate areas.

Yet God, Patient and Merciful, allows scientists to see the error of their ways, and will continue to do so until they accept Jesus.

Many scientists also worship God.

Radioactive decay is unreliable Scientists themselves say that it is not useful as a measuring tool. It's like trying to measure a foot with a piece of elastic.

I'm not sure why you linked that article. It even says right in it that there's problems with the data, mainly, that the research team claiming that decay rates can be influenced didn't actually take the data themselves.

[Aristotle]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

The other half of the first law is that they may change form. For example, solid matter can melt into a liquid, which can then evaporate into a gas. As this happens, the matter will take some of the heat energy from it's surroundings.

With carbon-14 dating, the carbon-14 doesn't build up anywhere else. It's an unstable molecule, and constantly breaks down into nitrogen-14. The reason it's used for dating is because before death, an organism has a certain ratio of carbon-12 and carbon-14 molecules present because the organism gets a constant supply of carbon-14 from the surroundings (breathing in the atmosphere or eating plants or other animals that have it in their bodies). After death, the organism can't get any more carbon-14, so the ratio changes, which is why it can be used for dating.

It is easy to expose this nonsense. According to the liberal professors who teach this nonsense, the half-life of carbon 14 is 5000 years or so but the age of the universe is 14 BILLION years. The means that there should only be (1/2)^3000000 fraction of the original carbon 14 left. Unless you assume the Universe started with all carbon 14, it should all be gone by now.

Such nonsense is so easily refuted. The BIBLE (KJV) specifically tells us how old the earth is. All these liberals have to do is read it.

[Physics!]

Re: Carbon Dating EXPOSED!

It is easy to expose this nonsense. According to the liberal professors who teach this nonsense, the half-life of carbon 14 is 5000 years or so but the age of the universe is 14 BILLION years. The means that there should only be (1/2)^3000000 fraction of the original carbon 14 left. Unless you assume the Universe started with all carbon 14, it should all be gone by now.

Such nonsense is so easily refuted. The BIBLE (KJV) specifically tells us how old the earth is. All these liberals have to do is read it.

Your argument is based on the fallacious premise that no new Carbon-14 can be created. In fact, this happens all of the time in our atmosphere. The age of the universe does not conflict with the half-life of C-14.