X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AtheistAsshat
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by MisterM View Post
    Earth is about 6000 years old.
    Well maybe when you divide the real age by seven-hundred sixty-six thousand six-hundred sixty-six

    766 666.6

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Lanfeust View Post
    Well, it takes thousands of years to evolve in the meaning that it takes thousands of generations with variations of time to have evolution.
    Check out the subversive strategy of the evolutionist. Although not explicit, this is an irrelevant appeal, to Darwin. Actually, that is not what Darwin said but secularists never seem to have read their own source material do they. We have. That is how we know it is wrong. But on we go, with:

    Also, the problem with oil is that no animal can survive this toxic waist, and you need surviving individuals to transmit it's 'properties'
    After I stopped laughing, I recalled a conversation with some of these Darwinists. "Extremophiles," they mumbled "live in ultra-high-temperature environments at insane pressures."

    "Yes," I thought; "that's why they're called extremophiles."

    Now I am not fond of being dipped boiling water or compressed to the degree available on the ocean floor.
    Not so the squat lobster. How merrily he dines on wriggling things in his hydrothermal vent! Others thrive on hydrogen sulphide, far more toxic than oil. "Oh," declaims the evolutionist "those creatures (and their food) have adapted to those conditions over thousands of generations, surviving individuals [mutants] transmitting their 'properties' [beneficial mutations].." DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT IS AN EVEN MORE TOXIC ENVIRONMENT THAN OIL. The oil which no organism can survive. So how did they survive here? The same principle should apply to squat lobsters and whales alike. That is the whole point of evolution.


    This surely is a theory in crisis. Deep crisis. What came next?


    ..no animals can survive it, so no evolution because no animals carries an immunity because oil is too toxic to oil till there are animals than can survive this and give it's genes to future generations.
    Well therefore, according to their Godless proposition, in thermal vents: no animals can survive it, so no evolution because no animals carries an immunity because hydrogen sulphide or superheated water is too toxic to ultra-high-pressure till there are animals than can survive this and give it's genes to future generations.

    So where did the squat lobster come from?

    The answer is obvious. God created them already designed for just the environment He intended them to inhabit. They have no more "evolved" to suit such extreme conditions, better adapted individuals passing on their mutations to future generations, than whales evolve to suit oil. There are no "better suited" individuals.

    But someone forgot to tell the squat lobsters.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alphonse Alban
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Elmer G. White View Post
    I hope my being new here and posting a reply is not too offensive.
    Not at all, but I really can't take any credit about this topic. I am merely re-posting a God given facts about His perfect words

    Praise LORD Jesus!

    Leave a comment:


  • Elmer G. White
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    These carefully constructed threads of REAL Creation Science based on the actual Bible are exactly what I have been looking for to strengthen my faith. As we have seen, evil looters have no rebuttals to these strong arguments.

    God bless the Friend of Christ who submitted the original post. Nothing to add, nothing to distract, only prayers of thanks to .

    I hope my being new here and posting a reply is not too offensive. If necessary, you are welcome to scold me in the Introduction forum.

    Yours humbly,

    Elmer G. White

    Leave a comment:


  • Alvin Moss
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Soon, you will be called before the Lord to explain your theories. After that, it will be off to Hell with you for the rest of time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Humble Scientist
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Amen brother! In my studies, (I'm pursuing my doctorate in biology at the Appalachian Bible College) I saw the article written about Nigerian Chibuihem Amalahah who dutifully and rightfully disproved gay marriage using magnets! Because a magnet has 2 poles, they repel each other, and therefore cannot be together! I hoped to recreate his discovery through others means of the physical world that GOD has bestowed upon HIS chosen.

    Chibuihem Amalaha, an award winning student at the University of Lagos, is claiming that he's "disproved" gay marriage through science — and he used the


    I too, started with water as it is God's gift of life and used in the born-again sacrament of baptism. I also used oil, which God's priest Samuel used to anoint the first Israelite king. But when I mixed them, they SEPARATED!!! Clearly, this obviously and BIBLICALLY proves that opposite genders were not meant to live together. Gay marriage is what humans are supposed to be joined as! GOD forgive us we were wrong! Go, find a person of the same sex and become ONE, as GOD intended!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Science=Satan View Post
    I need to say something blah blah blah unsaved hatespew.... show me proof that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
    Request granted.




    Now kindly stop attempting to derail our godly threads.

    Leave a comment:


  • Basilissa
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Science=Satan View Post
    I need to say something to that alan idiot you gave me a infraction for bearing false witness as repeating lines doesn't make them true...that is SOOOOOO hypicrtical
    What is hypicrtical? (Did I spell it right?) How do you pronounce it?

    you guys repeat the bible SOOOOOOO much
    Yes. It's called being a Christian, sweetie.

    so you guys are breaking you own rule
    And how do we do that, sweetheart?

    or do those rules only apply to us 'unsaved scum'
    's rules apply to everyone, sweetie. When you are burning in eternity, don't cry that nobody told you.

    i mean just because a book says something doesn't mean its true
    Of course not, sweetie. Unless, of course, the Book in question is the Bible, which contains the Word of God, which is obviously 100% correct.

    and why do you guys no read the treu Holy Bible you guys only read the kjv bible(I put it in lower because i dont belive in the kjv I belive in the Holy Bible)
    You do realize, that although there are different translation of the Bible, and while there are some superficial linguistic differences between translations, the meaning remains the same, right?

    Here is just one example - Leviticus 20:13 in several English translations:

    The translations are different, but God hates homosexuals equally in every one of them

    and to that proof person show me proof that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
    Here:
    www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=60019

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Science=Satan View Post
    I need to say something to that alan idiot...
    Yes, how dare someone correct someone as friendly and helpful as you?

    ...you gave me a infraction for bearing false witness as repeating lines doesn't make them true...that is SOOOOOO hypicrtical you guys repeat the bible SOOOOOOO much so you guys are breaking you own rule or do those rules only apply to us 'unsaved scum'...
    Just because you don't understand something means they're doing it wrong?

    ...i dont belive in the kjv I belive in the Holy Bible...
    Which one would that be, and why is it the "true" Bible?

    ... and to that proof person show me proof that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
    Of course you believe the world is 4 1/2 billion years old because you read it in a book so that makes it true.

    Cue the inevitable and predictable response where you bring up carbon dating and claim that proves something even though carbon dating cannot be used to date anything more than 62,000 years old, let alone 4 1/2 billion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Science=Satan
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    I need to say something to that alan idiot you gave me a infraction for bearing false witness as repeating lines doesn't make them true...that is SOOOOOO hypicrtical you guys repeat the bible SOOOOOOO much so you guys are breaking you own rule or do those rules only apply to us 'unsaved scum' i mean just because a book says something doesn't mean its true and why do you guys no read the treu Holy Bible you guys only read the kjv bible(I put it in lower because i dont belive in the kjv I belive in the Holy Bible) and to that proof person show me proof that the earth is only 6,000 years old.

    Leave a comment:


  • MitzaLizalor
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Science=Satan View Post
    No the Earth is 4.45 billion years old.
    Evidence?

    Here's a thought experiment.

    1. The sun is triangular.
    2. .. (there isn't a “2”)



    Originally posted by Misanthropist View Post
    However, The fact that you are saying that Christians are perfect. You basically trying to say That is the master "race" well religion in this matter, is a horrible thing to do. Im sure God told you that not everybody can be perfect but, they can always do their best. Which is perfect in a shorter description.
    Been hanging around priests have you.

    GOD informs us that Christians are perfect.

    PRIESTS probably tell you to "just do your best" but you never can, so you have to come back for another treatment. And another. Bring cash.

    Christianity is not any sort of master religion. When Jesus returne He will kill everyone else, so there will be no "masters" with everyone on an equal footing. Except for Jesus whom we will be praising in song 24/7. The décor is very tasteful. And since we'll be with Jesus, we know that we will be able to laugh with Him at events unfolding in hell. Forever.


    click to read

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Science=Satan View Post
    No the Earth is 4.45 billion years old.
    The Bible says (if you add up all the ages for the people mentioned in the "begats") that the world is about 6,017 1/2 years old. If you have Scripture that countermands that, please cite it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Science=Satan
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by MisterM View Post
    So you disproved evolution there

    Earth is about 6000 years old.

    YiC, M
    No the Earth is 4.45 billion years old.

    Leave a comment:


  • Holy Henry
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Misanthropist View Post
    There was no thread created by me. You see the problem is you dont know who i am. I am not willing to show myself to a bunch of people who dismiss everything or other opinions/facts. I know i should not actually involve myself in this website. Yet i could not help myself from helping others realize things they turn a blind eye on.

    P.S I could probably see myself banned,because when the facts beat you, you just ban people. Now try be a little more patient and let people have a voice.
    Atheists don't deal in facts. Just hate, denial and unproven theories.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zechariah Smyth
    replied
    Re: Oil, disproving evilution!

    Originally posted by Misanthropist View Post
    There was no thread created by me. You see the problem is you dont know who i am. I am not willing to show myself to a bunch of people who dismiss everything or other opinions/facts. I know i should not actually involve myself in this website. Yet i could not help myself from helping others realize things they turn a blind eye on.

    P.S I could probably see myself banned,because when the facts beat you, you just ban people. Now try be a little more patient and let people have a voice.
    So, you can dismiss US, but we can't dismiss OTHERS.

    Sounds legit.



    If you don't introduce yourself properly, I'm afraid you may be asked to leave.

    Yours in Christ,

    Z. Smyth

    Leave a comment:

Working...