[Tool of satan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Look at this film at 11.00 minutes. In reduced gravity please explain to me why an astronaut would jump up SLOWER than they would on Earth? Surely they would jump up faster and higher. If not please explain why???

YIC

Jack

Jumping up looks pretty normal, hard to tell how much energy/effort he put into it. Landing on the ground would be slower because the force of gravity pulls on you less.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Jumping up looks pretty normal, hard to tell how much energy/effort he put into it. Landing on the ground would be slower because the force of gravity pulls on you less.

No, the jumping up doesn't look normal, it is slow. The amount of energy he puts in would only effect the height he reached. You try jumping up and down at different speeds and let me know how it goes.

The reason that jumps up slowly is because we are watching a slow motion movie. Filmed on Earth, just like all the others.


Ecclesiastes 2:14
The wise man's eyes are in his head; but the fool walketh in darkness: and I myself perceived also that one event happeneth to them all.

YIC

Jack

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

because the force of gravity pulls on you less.

Yet more nonsense proving you are wrong. Why would an astronaut suddenly weigh less when he is on the Moon? Do they get an extreme diet while they are on the way? Do they eat Big Macs all the way home? I assume people pretending the Moon landing was real will have no problems pretending there is a McDonalds in space.

[schsuter]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Yet more nonsense proving you are wrong. Why would an astronaut suddenly weigh less when he is on the Moon? Do they get an extreme diet while they are on the way? Do they eat Big Macs all the way home? I assume people pretending the Moon landing was real will have no problems pretending there is a McDonalds in space.

Easy, because the the moon's mass is considerably smaller than Earth's mass.
Next question.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Easy, because the the moon's mass is considerably smaller than Earth's mass.
Next question.

So, the Moon's mass changes a so-called astronaut's mass?



Please, I'm BEGGING you, go post that on one of your pet "science" websites.

[schsuter]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

So, the Moon's mass changes a so-called astronaut's mass?



Please, I'm BEGGING you, go post that on one of your pet "science" websites.

No.
The moon's mass is smaller than the earth's mass hence the moon's attractive force is smaller than Earth's.
Simple, really.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

No.
The moon's mass is smaller than the earth's mass hence the moon's attractive force is smaller than Earth's.
Simple, really.

There you go again...moving the goalposts.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

No.
The moon's mass is smaller than the earth's mass hence the moon's attractive force is smaller than Earth's.
Simple, really.

I see, I suppose the 'magnets' inside are weaker?

Do you find the Sun attractive?

[schsuter]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

There you go again...moving the goalposts.

Be so kind an point out where I did that.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Be so kind an point out where I did that.

Sure.

No.
The moon's mass is smaller than the earth's mass hence the moon's attractive force is smaller than Earth's.
Simple, really.

You're welcome.

[schsuter]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

I see, I suppose the 'magnets' inside are weaker?

Do you find the Sun attractive?

No, it's mass is simply not as big as the Earths.

Because the bigger the mass, the stronger the attraction between two objects.

Sloppily spoken, this is why a fat person is pulled towards Earth noticably stronger than a slim one.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

While we're at it, why wouldn't Buzz Aldrin swear on a Bible that he walked on the moon? Why did he punch a Christian for questioning him?

It wasn't just Buzz Aldrin that was caught lying. The same applies to Louis Armstrong. He wouldn't swear on the Bible that he landed on the moon and he rejected $5000 for charity.

Isaiah 59:13 In transgressing and lying against the Lord, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood.

No wonder God smited Him shortly after.

YIC

Jack

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

No, it's mass is simply not as big as the Earths.

Because the bigger the mass, the stronger the attraction between two objects.

Sloppily spoken, this is why a fat person is pulled towards Earth noticably stronger than a slim one.

If a fat person and a slim person jump off a bridge at the same time who would hit the ground first?

YIC

Jack

[schsuter]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

If a fat person and a slim person jump off a bridge at the same time who would hit the ground first?

YIC

Jack

I am not so sure if I like your example...
Anyway, if you aren't counting in aerodynamics they will hit the floor the same instant.

Technically spoken, the reason for that is that falling is not a constant movement but an acceleration - the longer you fall the faster you get.

While the force pulling the bigger mass towards earth is stronger, so is the force required for it to start moving; similar to that a heavy bowling ball is harder to set in motion than a basket ball.

The difference in the force of attraction however will become evident once they hit the floor, since heavy object logically has a stronger impact than a lighter one just like hitting a wall with a bowling ball causes more damage than a hit with a basketball at equal speed.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

I am not so sure if I like your example...
Anyway, if you aren't counting in aerodynamics they will hit the floor the same instant.

Technically spoken, the reason for that is that falling is not a constant movement but an acceleration - the longer you fall the faster you get.

While the force pulling the bigger mass towards earth is stronger, so is the force required for it to start moving; similar to that a heavy bowling ball is harder to set in motion than a basket ball.

The difference in the force of attraction however will become evident once they hit the floor, since heavy object logically has a stronger impact than a lighter one just like hitting a wall with a bowling ball causes more damage than a hit with a basketball at equal speed.

I congratulate you on getting the right answer however your reasoning is flawed.

Isaiah 22:19 And I will drive thee from thy station, and from thy state shall he pull thee down.

God does it that way.

YIC

Jack