[Enobarbus]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

Men.....

Have balls

Must I say no more? *Kicks*

I was stronger then my brother since being a fetus, face it, women can be stronger then men. Women are the ones who bring life into the world, all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.

Would you like a new avatar. I'll see what's available.

[Enobarbus]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

Men.....

Have balls

Must I say no more? *Kicks*

I was stronger then my brother since being a fetus, face it, women can be stronger then men. Women are the ones who bring life into the world, all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.

Are you showing ant-male tendencies icksy? Are you an eclectic pagan or another feminazi?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

Men.....

Have balls
... all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.

Would it kill you to keep your filthy mind out of the gutter for five minutes?

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

Some of those (the words I've bolded) are called standard characteristics, not diseases. Sheeesh. The rest of words which are not bolded would not be restricted to females, especially given some of the men here as an example. *snicker*

Leave Darren-Meyers out of this. He's barely a man anyway.

Nope, my X chromosomes would have canceled out the wimpy male Y chromosome. Face it, you're stuck with it. Stop trying to make others share that pain.

Oh, so now women can have babies without a man?

Can an oven just spontaneously produce a Thanksgiving turkey? No.
So what makes you think a baby oven can spontaneously produce a baby?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

Leave Darren-Meyers out of this. He's barely a man anyway.

I wasn't talking about Darren.

Oh, so now women can have babies without a man?

Can an oven just spontaneously produce a Thanksgiving turkey? No.
So what makes you think a baby oven can spontaneously produce a baby?

I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done. Artificial insemination, technically that requires a man's input but that's it. The woman has no contact with the man whatsoever for the insemination process.
I was saying that, when the baby is first made, the X and Y chromosomes determine male or female. If it's a girl she will get X chromosomes, if its a boy he will get the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome will not show itself in a female baby.
Where on earth did you get the idea that I was talking about male-free conception?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done.

So are you claiming it, or aren't you?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

So are you claiming it, or aren't you?

I was not claiming it PRIOR TO THAT POINT. And I do admit that even artificial insemination does involve some input from a man, however it does not require the woman to have contact with the man.

[Lunadea]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

Oh, so now women can have babies without a man?

Can an oven just spontaneously produce a Thanksgiving turkey? No.
So what makes you think a baby oven can spontaneously produce a baby?

What about Dolly the sheep and that cute little kittie they cloned? Any sperm involved there?

All that's needed is a female cell.

[Lady Sorrow]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

What nonsense you claim, Rachael. The bible clearly states that everything significant comes from men. Typical of a devil worshipping strumpet like you to claim otherwise.
Why, next thing you'll be saying that women should have equal opportunities in the workplace! The idea, the very idea!

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

[/COLOR]
I wasn't talking about Darren.


I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done. Artificial insemination, technically that requires a man's input but that's it. The woman has no contact with the man whatsoever for the insemination process.
I was saying that, when the baby is first made, the X and Y chromosomes determine male or female. If it's a girl she will get X chromosomes, if its a boy he will get the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome will not show itself in a female baby.
Where on earth did you get the idea that I was talking about male-free conception?

You can't have it both ways, witch.

Either you're saying this X(female) chromosome is 100% the product of a woman, in which case you are also stating that not having a Y chromozone makes one the product of a mother alone since X would be a female only chromozone.

Or in the case that the male and the female play a part in procreation, the X chromozone must also be of the male. In which case both X and Y are male since an XX(female) or an YX(male) are both the comobination of male and female.

Some king back in the old days killed his wife, then his second wife, then his third and who knows how many more because he kept having females and no male heirs. Secular pseudo-scientist, your false gods, claim he didn't have any Y's or some rubbish. Clearly everything, rather X or Y, would be of the male according to even false secular fairy tales.

Get right with Jesus, wench.