Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

[Mistress Cookie]

We all know the rampant, unapologetic homosexual's "comunity" is the biggest thing ever threatening our children, our government, our churches, our lives.

In order to erradicate the pernicious threat....what would happen if we sedated all the homosexuals and gave them sex-change operations? Then there would no more men laying with men or women laying with women...it would be MAN and WOMAN, as God™ intended.

(The so-called bi-sexuals would be harder to fix....because no matter what you changed them to they would still lust after and attack anyone.)

(I haven't figured that part out yet.)

What do you all think? Could this be an answer...?? Has it been in front of us the whole time...??
.

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

I'm not sure, Sister. Even if we mandate vaginoplasty for all queers, what if they choose to still be homos? Then accomodate two new fags at the same time? We do know that it's a deliberate choice in opting for gayness, and it can come at any stage of life.

Maybe a better approach would be laws requiring colostomies and the surgical closing of the anus for all fags? This is really the only way to put a permanent stop to the mud-packing that makes Jesus weep so inconsolably.

I will pray for guidance from above.

In Christ

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

I've been told that many men who have the surgery to give the appearance of being female then choose to behave as lezbertarians. This says to me that once people have decided to make lifestyle choices that outrage Our Lord, they will continue to do so, no matter what.

[Dr. Ernest C. Ville, D.C.S.]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

NO, NO, NO. I can't emphasize this enough. When a child is conceived, it is set up as a male or a female. When that child finally emerges triumphantly from his mother's cooter, that baby either has a tallywhacker or her own cooter. It's not hard people. Should the state also sponsor cosmetic surgeries? How about haircuts? Mani-pedis? Where does the line stop? This is simply a rejection of God's hand-picked role for that person.

Of course now that it's election season Obama has made an issue out of this. It's just another front for him to push his "universal health care" meme. Before you know it, we're going to be forced to have a sex-change operation, in the name of "equality". Maybe he'll even force us all to become sexless, because sexual differences aren't equal

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Can we please get a warning in the titles of these threads? My eyes are seriously hurt by that horrible horrible picture.

As to your question, I am all for castrating all gays as it would prevent them from raping me when I am going to Church. Looking over my shoulders all the time gets tiring.

[Hannah Davis]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

When it comes down to it, is this really Scriptural? Genesis 1:27-28 says otherwise-

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

This says male and female. If a queer has a sex change, then not only are they a homer, they are rejecting God's design for them. That's double condemnation.

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

When it comes down to it, is this really Scriptural?...This says male and female. If a queer has a sex change, then not only are they a homer, they are rejecting God's design for them. That's double condemnation.

Yeah, you're probably right. It's just hard. WE DIDN'T ASK FOR THIS FIGHT. The homosexuals have shoved us face down between a rock and a hard place, and making any kind of leeway or progress with them is oh so difficult! They're so obstinate, and swollen with their false pride.!

[Hannah Davis]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Yeah, you're probably right. It's just hard. WE DIDN'T ASK FOR THIS FIGHT. The homosexuals have shoved us face down between a rock and a hard place, and making any kind of leeway or progress with them is oh so difficult! They're so obstinate, and swollen with their false pride.!

Yes, yes they are. Patience, Sister. When Jesus comes they will get their just desserts. They can be obstinate in HELL.
Yours In Christ,
Hannah Davis

[Bjorn Jensen]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Absolutely no! Anyone who goes through a sex-change is automatically a homosexual if they have sex with someone no matter if they are married or not. If a male-to-female "sex-changed" freak has sex with a man, then he is gay because he is a man, and if he has sex with a woman then he is a lesbian cause he looks like a woman.
Infact there is no such thing as a real sex-change, you are the one that God created you as and will always be so.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Jesus is not fooled so easily. The queers might think that if they pay some joo doctor to cut their tallywhacker off and slap on some cheap makeup and a tight cocktail dress that they can trick God into not killing them and burying the bodies on the outskirts of Freehold, but they have another think coming if they think that.

[Cursed]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

I don't think the government should be funding anybody's anything!

If God wants you dead, He gives you cancer or He hits you with a meteor or whatever strikes His fancy.

What do you need a surgery for? So your arm is broken, that was God's will. Tough it out.

So, in closing, no sex changes, no abortions, no chemotherapy, no appendectomy, no NOTHING.

Stay out of my pocket, Obamacare!

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Ok, serious question: when a girl wants a sex-change where do they get the extra ding-dong from? Is this the catalyst behind all of that stem cell talk?

YiC,

Zech

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Ok, serious question: when a girl wants a sex-change where do they get the extra ding-dong from? Is this the catalyst behind all of that stem cell talk?

YiC,

Zech

I've often wondered that myself Brother Smith. Logically you might conclude that they just transplant tallywhackers from people that want theirs cut off. I think that they can transplant just about anything these days. In the same vein, I'm also wondering how they give the monthly curse to those transsexuals that want to become women. Next thing you know they will be lobbying for free menstra shacks.

[Bjorn Jensen]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Ok, serious question: when a girl wants a sex-change where do they get the extra ding-dong from? Is this the catalyst behind all of that stem cell talk?

YiC,

Zech

Latest from Obamacare, Obama wants to cut your tallywacker off and put it on a girl!

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

I think we are missing the point. When ever anyone goes againsts scripture IN ANY WAY it is for one reason and one reason only:

That's right: to unleash a powerful golden yellow hot stream of urinal fluid onto the crying face, eyes and mouth of the baby Jesus.

It's not because they genuinely feel as if their gender does not match their physiology it's because the hate God with such a passion that they mutilate themselves out of shear spite.

It's like Johnny A-rab blowing himself up. It's not about dirty joos occupying land forcibly taken from them: it's about taking a dump in God's outstretched gentle hands and smearing it in His eyes.

Sex changualism is no better than killing loads of people for pointless ideological reasons not including God!

YIC