[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Being saved by childbearing.

It's a bit of a loophole killer.

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

If a male-to-female "sex-changed" freak has sex with a man, then he is gay because he is a man, and if he has sex with a woman then he is a lesbian cause he looks like a woman.

And so, they remain doomed.

It's all so complicated! There's just no pleasing them!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

What if we changed it from "sex change" to "sexecution"?

They come out eunuchs.

[RoninFaith Waiting for Email Confirmation]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

No the American Tax Payer should not have to fit the bill because someone is unhappy with their sexual gender. If they want the snipped/stretched they gotta pay for it.

-RoninFaith

PS: For me it is really a rudeness thing, expecting others to pay for your wants/needs. I was raised to provide for myself when it comes to insurance an other of life's necessities. Health Insurance is expensive but not having it is worse and expecting others to pay for yours is just ignorant.

[Nobar King]

Re: Should the government fund sex "changes" ?

Health Insurance is expensive but not having it is worse and expecting others to pay for yours is just ignorant.

ARE YOU TRYING TO TAKE AWAY MY MEDICARE???