[True Disciple]

Re: Where did the races come from?

this is so racist it is actually kind of funny

1. What on earth are you talking about?

2. Even if there was something racist, it disgusts me that you think racism is funny. Don't you realize millions of people through the ages have suffered because of racism? They don't think racism is funny, boy. You have a strange lack of morals. Clearly, you are no True Christian™.

3. At these forums, we appreciate it when new members introduce themselves at the Introduction Forum. It's part of the Pastor's Guidelines, in fact, and refusal to do so can result in you getting infracted or even banned. So please post your name, gender (together with permission from your husband to post here, in case you're a woman), marital situation, your favorite Bible Verse, your church, your pastor and your favorite color. Though the last one is optional

[Haladin]

Re: Where did the races come from?

this is so racist it is actually kind of funny

[True Disciple]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Of course, as is alluded to in Luke 3:23 Jesus is not actually the son of Joseph, He is the Son of God, also check Luke 1:34 for proof the Mary was a virgin, Joseph had nothing at all to do with the birth, Jesus is in no way a descendant of Jacob, direct or indirect.

Amazing that you had never heard of the virgin Mary before.

Brother Follower is right on this. It is for good reason that the Holy Bible says Jesus was "supposed to be" Joseph's son. Joseph and Mary pretended this because otherwise people would condemn Mary as an adulterer, and possibly stone her.

And Jesus was indeed white, as He was the Son of God, Who is White as well. Your quotation of Revelation further confirms this.

[A Follower]

Re: Where did the races come from?

I have a question. It says in the diagram that Jacob was an Israelite, and we all know that Israelites are sand nigras. But by this passage:


23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
24Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
25Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,
26Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,
27Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,
28Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,
29Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
30Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,
31Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,
32Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,
33Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
34Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,
35Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,
36Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
37Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God. (Luke 3:23-45)

Jesus was clearly a direct descendent of Jacob. Does this not mean that Jesus was a sand nigra? I thought Jesus was white.

His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire (Revelations 1:14)

Can someone with a greater Biblical knowledge than I explain this discrepancy?

Of course, as is alluded to in Luke 3:23 Jesus is not actually the son of Joseph, He is the Son of God, also check Luke 1:34 for proof the Mary was a virgin, Joseph had nothing at all to do with the birth, Jesus is in no way a descendant of Jacob, direct or indirect.

Amazing that you had never heard of the virgin Mary before.

[Jacob the Angry Liar]

Re: Where did the races come from?

I have a question. It says in the diagram that Jacob was an Israelite, and we all know that Israelites are sand nigras. But by this passage:


23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
24Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,
25Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,
26Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,
27Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of Zorobabel, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,
28Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,
29Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,
30Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,
31Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,
32Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,
33Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
34Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,
35Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,
36Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
37Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan, 38Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God. (Luke 3:23-45)

Jesus was clearly a direct descendent of Jacob. Does this not mean that Jesus was a sand nigra? I thought Jesus was white.

His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire (Revelations 1:14)

Can someone with a greater Biblical knowledge than I explain this discrepancy?

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Judaism, or joos as you so lovingly put it, came before Christianity.[...]

I have Scripture to show that this is a blatant lie.

John 17:5 “And now, O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.”


Jesus was there before Creation - the joos weren't.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Where did the races come from?

For those who think you can believe in both God and evolution: Let's drop the ToE and explore you lack of giving glory and honor to God because you're running out of time...you'll end up with less fail that way as well.

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Judaism, or joos as you so lovingly put it, came before Christianity. I'm sure you know that, you're not dumb. But really? We adopted their book, the old testament, and your saying that they are in no way are right? The only difference is that they don't see Jesus as a true prophet of god. And when Muhammad, from Sadie Arabia, came around the Christens didn't see him as a true prophet either. Is the connection not obvious? Jews, Christens and Islamic people are all children of god, through Abraham, and will therefore be accepted in the kingdom. As my teacher once said "Open your minds, and close your mouths". They are all semitic religions and are all equal in the eyes of god. Therefor, yes Christens and Jews are on the same level, and are both right.
This is getting way off topic of the actual post, so I'll stop trying to defend myself in this thread.

That is one the biggest pile of ignorant bull dung I've ever read on here! Have you actually ever read the Bible or the Quran? The Bible says all non-Christians will go to Hell, the Quran says all non-Muslims will go to Hell. Where on earth did you get the idea that "everyone will be accepted into the kingdom of Heaven" when that idea appears nowhere in Judaical, Christian, or Islamic teachings?

[lrbailey]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Judaism, or joos as you so lovingly put it, came before Christianity. I'm sure you know that, you're not dumb. But really? We adopted their book, the old testament, and your saying that they are in no way are right? The only difference is that they don't see Jesus as a true prophet of god. And when Muhammad, from Sadie Arabia, came around the Christens didn't see him as a true prophet either. Is the connection not obvious? Jews, Christens and Islamic people are all children of god, through Abraham, and will therefore be accepted in the kingdom. As my teacher once said "Open your minds, and close your mouths". They are all semitic religions and are all equal in the eyes of god. Therefor, yes Christens and Jews are on the same level, and are both right.
This is getting way off topic of the actual post, so I'll stop trying to defend myself in this thread.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Did I invalidate the bible in any way?I just suggested both were right

That's like saying queers and normal people are both right. Or joos and Christians. Not possible boy. You're showing your ignorance.

Honestly, when was the last time your father laid a good Christian beating on you?

[lrbailey]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Did I invalidate the bible in any way?I just suggested both were right

[Lola Handcock]

Re: Where did the races come from?

REV.Osborne
I have just read that irbailey comment.Science has a theory on how the earth and the universe came to be ( and they are wrong ,all they need to do is read the book of Genesis )

How come this guy thinks that the Bible KJV 1611 is a theory ? Thinking like that will result in a trip to hell will it not?

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Where did the races come from?

lrbailey,

The issue of circular logic in the Bible is discussed here. I highly recommend you read it because it shows that just because the Bible does use circular logic, does not invalidate it in any way. It's a common misconception to assume just because something uses circular logic that it must be false.

[lrbailey]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Can we look at both the theory of evolution the bible as just theories? Yes the Bible uses circular logic to point out that it is the word of god. You have one powerful piece of evidence that you are right and evolutionist are wrong. But there is more and more evidence of evolution coming in every year, while the bible holds onto its circular logic (an example of circular logic is "I'm telling the truth", though I doubt any of you believe that). So while evidence keeps presenting it's self, but the Bible will always be right considering it is the word of god. I doubt that evolution will ever be taken by all, but I think most will see that both theories are at least quasi true.

I'm not saying their is no heaven or hell, I'm saying that even though god created man he is changing and adapting to the environment he has created for himself.

[lrbailey]

Re: Where did the races come from?

Can we look at both the theory of evolution the bible as just theories? Yes the Bible uses circular logic to point out that it is the word of god. You have one powerful piece of evidence that you are right and evolutionist are wrong. But there is more and more evidence of evolution coming in every year, while the bible holds onto its circular logic (an example of circular logic is "I'm telling the truth", though I doubt any of you believe that). So while evidence keeps presenting it's self, but the Bible will always be right considering it is the word of god. I doubt that evolution will ever be taken by all, but I think most will see that both theories are at least quasi true.