Bigfoot, Sasquatch, Yeti, Yowie. Whatever you want to call him, one thing is certain. He is as real as Balaam's talking ass.

Evilutionary scientists such as Jane Nogoodatall would have us believe Bigfoot is some as yet undiscovered species of hominid and use it to try and disprove the Bible.
Unfortunately for sickular science, God in His Infinite Wisdom foresaw their demonic ploy and made sure to mention His role in Bigfoot's creation.
The only question scientists should be asking about Bigfoot is which Biblical figure is he descended from.
Genesis 25:25 And the first came out red, all ouer like an hairy garment: and they called his name, Esau.
See also Genesis 27 which deals more with Esau's hirsute nature.
Or does Bigfoot come from the line of Ishmael?
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wilde man; his hand will be against euery man, and euery mans hand against him: & he shal dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Genesis 21:20 And God was with the lad, and he grew, and dwelt in the wildernesse, and became an archer.
As you can see, either one would be a likely candidate as an ancestor of Bigfoot. It is even possible that the children of Esau met and mated with the children of Ishmael, so both could be Patriarchs in the Bigfoot line.
Why do sickular scientists reject the wisdom of the Bible and continue to overlook the obvious when it is right in front of them?

Evilutionary scientists such as Jane Nogoodatall would have us believe Bigfoot is some as yet undiscovered species of hominid and use it to try and disprove the Bible.
Unfortunately for sickular science, God in His Infinite Wisdom foresaw their demonic ploy and made sure to mention His role in Bigfoot's creation.
The only question scientists should be asking about Bigfoot is which Biblical figure is he descended from.
Genesis 25:25 And the first came out red, all ouer like an hairy garment: and they called his name, Esau.
See also Genesis 27 which deals more with Esau's hirsute nature.
Or does Bigfoot come from the line of Ishmael?
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wilde man; his hand will be against euery man, and euery mans hand against him: & he shal dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Genesis 21:20 And God was with the lad, and he grew, and dwelt in the wildernesse, and became an archer.
As you can see, either one would be a likely candidate as an ancestor of Bigfoot. It is even possible that the children of Esau met and mated with the children of Ishmael, so both could be Patriarchs in the Bigfoot line.
Why do sickular scientists reject the wisdom of the Bible and continue to overlook the obvious when it is right in front of them?
Comment