[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I like the reflection now taking place in the press. It looks at the big picture of the Meghan/Harry marriage. The only conclusion is the marriage should never have been allowed.

Prosperity in the Imperial Kingdom depended on slave labor performed by non white races. Britain cannot just say, "Ok, that's over." It needs to be an Empire run by and for white people. If it suddenly says, "Megan's fine. We were wrong the entire time," what happens then? All those colonies with dirt poor black people would say "Let's see the money."

Buckingham Palace was right in insulting Megan and pushing her down the road. It had no choice. The world press needs to explain how correct the Palace was and what a mistake Megan made by directing her charms as Hapless Harry.

As Harry and Meghan's family grows, their safety only comes after rejecting an assimilation fantasy | Salon.com

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Prosperity in the Imperial Kingdom depended on slave labor performed by non white races. Britain cannot just say, "Ok, that's over." It needs to be an Empire run by and for white people. If it suddenly says, "Megan's fine. We were wrong the entire time," what happens then? All those colonies with dirt poor black people would say "Let's see the money."

And they have the nerve to call us racist. When a Negro sits in 10 Downing Street, they can call us racist. We American conservatives accepted Obongo's (unmitigated disaster of a) presidency with grace and maturity. Clearly the Brits couldn't to the same with their mulatto princess.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Oh no. Lilibet Diana? They might as well have named her LookAtMe MyGrammiesAPrincess NoNotThatOneTheOtherOne ThinkOfTheStarvingKidsInAfrica Engelson-Sussex-Merkel-Winfrey.

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Oh no. Lilibet Diana? They might as well have named her LookAtMe MyGrammiesAPrincess NoNotThatOneTheOtherOne ThinkOfTheStarvingKidsInAfrica Engelson-Sussex-Merkel-Winfrey.

Oh, Dear. One wonders if they thought that these names would, somehow or another, give them a few good marks, following their appearance on the Winnifred Ophrey show. Oh, well; at least the Queen doesn't have to worry about them coming up her walkway to visit her again; although, I don't see why we, in 's blessed and glorious , should have that burden, either.

[Galvanize]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I just read Meghan and Harry embraced Biden. What a shock. President Trump gave them a protected harbor. They expected to escape England. After the President let them in the country, they helped his despised rival.


Presently, they are gathering exposure that ought to be going to the President. Their essence in this nation experiences brought only difficulty. Presently, they are blameworthy of aiding rout our most noteworthy President ever.


How would we dispose of them?

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I just read Meghan and Harry embraced Biden. What a shock. President Trump gave them a protected harbor. They expected to escape England. After the President let them in the country, they helped his despised rival.

Presently, they are gathering exposure that ought to be going to the President. Their essence in this nation experiences brought only difficulty. Presently, they are blameworthy of aiding rout our most noteworthy President ever.

How would we dispose of them?

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/

Hello, dear Miss Galvanize, and We are thrilled that you desire fellowship with . I must mention to you, as is the case for all newcomers, that we would like it very much if you would kindly make your way to our friendly Introduction Forum, so that you can post an introductory message, so that we might become acquainted.

The link to that forum is here:

https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=16

Whilst there, please pay close attention to our requests at the top of the page; however, I am only too happy to provide them here, for your assistance:

The introduction forum Attention Unsaved Trash: This the ONLY subforum you can start threads in. Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

We look forward to getting to know you, Dear -- here, at .

[Des]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

How would we dispose of them?

Do what England has always done with their scum. Send them to Austria to ride kangaroos and be eaten by crocodiles.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

In further evidence of his determination to shun the limelight and live as an entirely private citizen, Prince Hal says that he "warned" the boss of the Twatter ahead of the Capitol so-called riot.

"I warned him his platform was allowing a coup to be staged," Prince Harry said at the RE:WIRED tech forum in the US.

"That email was sent the day before. And then it happened and I haven't heard from him since," the duke said.

Let us think about this for a moment. You know that something "bad" of that nature is about to happen. Do you:

1. Call the police?
2. Call the military?
3. Call the president's office?
4. Send an email to the CEO of a social media platform? (Bear in mind that pretty much everyone we know has ex-Prince Halibut's emails sent directly to their spam folder.)

When President Trump returns to the Oval Office, that boy will be sent straight back over the Canadian border!

[Unfalsifiable]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Will the Prince face any legal repercussions for admitting he was masterminding the "attack"?


Or is this another Prince Andrew situation?

[WWJDnow]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Will the Prince face any legal repercussions for admitting he was masterminding the "attack"?

Or is this another Prince Andrew situation?

Prince Andrew was viciously set up by those evil, underaged Jezebels. What man wouldn't be tempted with young, attractive teen girls flaunting their nubile, barely clothed bodies all around? Yes, the Prince should have avoided the temptation entirely, but it would have been atrocious manners simply to leave the private island in the middle of a royal visit. Prince Andrew is a good Christian who fell temporarily into Satan's grasp, so he deserves our sympathy and our prayers. Jesus has forgiven him, so why shouldn't we? Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. And let's achieve justice by throwing those young harlots into prison!

Prince Harry and his negress wife, on the other hand, are tools of the Devil (as demonstrated by the flagrant anti-Trump activism discussed above), and therefore deserve our scorn.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Prince Andrew was viciously set up by those evil, underaged Jezebels.

In Prince Andrew's homeland, the age of consent is 16 and has been for well over 100 years. So this is very much a case of move along, nothing to see here.

[WWJDnow]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

In Prince Andrew's homeland, the age of consent is 16 and has been for well over 100 years. So this is very much a case of move along, nothing to see here.

The problem isn't the girls' ages--they should, frankly, have been married off around 15, which is pretty old for marriage by Biblical standards. Nevertheless, Prince Andrew committed the sin of fornication. There aren't many powerful men who, like our Pastor Zeke, are completely immune to female wiles. Yes, the good pastor is that holy. Prince Andrew, however, fell just a bit short of the mark this time.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Prince Andrew, however, fell just a bit short of the mark this time.

Mistakes were made. Young women got slept with. It just goes to show you can't be too careful. So, lesson learned. Everyone needs to be more vigilant moving forward.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

PRIVACY ALERT! Ellen interviewing Meghan on television.

"We're just happy," she said.

She reflected on the joy of being a parent alongside her husband, as she promoted a children's book she has written that features illustrations based on Harry and Archie.

"Harry being a dad was the most beautiful thing to watch," she said.

"Suddenly we realised, 'Oh right,' everyone talks about what it's like for the second child but no-one talks about the adjustment for the first child when the second one comes along."

Meghan's last television interview was with the US broadcaster Oprah Winfrey in March, when she said it was "liberating" to be able to speak freely, away from the institution of the Royal Family.

The Sussexes announced they would "step back" as senior royals in January 2020.

[handmaiden]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Have no fear, the Constitution is here!

And apparently, it includes a safeguard against uppity actresses-turned-princesses trying to run for President.


How Meghan Could Be Stopped From Running For US President.


Praise Jesus for forward-thinking legislators. We didn't need the Bonapartes bothering us and we don't need the Sussexes sticking their fingers into our business.