[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Meghan and Harry just finished their $5 million interview with Oprah.

Here is what I can't understand. They said they were stunned when the Royals pulled their security. Harry assumed he was entitled to security by birth. They had to scurry around and figure out some other arrangement for security in California.

Why didn't they simply arm themselves? Harry could tuck a weapon under his jacket. She could put one in her purse. Anyone who threatened them, bang, problem solved. There are such simple solutions right there at the gun store.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/03/29/trump-u-s-wont-pay-harry-meghan-security-move-reports/2936672001/

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Why didn't they simply arm themselves? Harry could tuck a weapon under his jacket. She could put one in her purse. Anyone who threatened them, bang, problem solved. There are such simple solutions right there at the gun store.

Well exactly, Brother Mayor Hold, Sir! Former-Prince Harold is ex-military and served in Afghanistan, though whether he was allowed access to weaponry while being sheltered from harm by his soldiers is unclear. Maybe they let him have a gun but no bullets? But surely Mizz Marple must have learned how to handle a gun - if only Chekhov's - during her degree in Theater Studies?

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Meghan and Harry just finished their $5 million interview with Oprah. Why didn't they simply arm themselves? Harry could tuck a weapon under his jacket. She could put one in her purse.

Oh, this is such a sensible idea, dear Brother Mayor Hold -- one that must be lost on Meghan & Harry (or, as I think of them: Nutmeg & Ginger). Goodness knows that they have lived in the blessed long enough to know that they can walk into any gun store, and buy whatever they need.

I'm wondering if I should put a call in to that lovely Lauren Boebert, to see if she would be interested in coaching Nutmeg in how to use a gun properly. If anybody knows her way around a firearm, it's dear Lauren!

And, it's very important that the unhappy couple receive their marksmanship training from qualified individuals, and not from some dozy, old, sleepy Joe Burden type:

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Smith and Wesson makes a perfect Meghan weapon. The couple, now cut off from the Royal payroll, needs money. What better source of a few dollars would be her endorsement of the 360 PD Airlite. As I understand it, she could have several 360's, each a color to match her nails on any particular day:

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Smith and Wesson makes a perfect Meghan weapon. The couple, now cut off from the Royal payroll, needs money. What better source of a few dollars would be her endorsement of the 360 PD Airlite. As I understand it, she could have several 360's, each a color to match her nails on any particular day:

Oh, yes, dear Brother Mayor Hold, and what better fashion accessory to have, than a coordinating gun. Why, with Easter just around the corner, one can think of several situations in which this would be so ever so suitable.

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Smith and Wesson makes a perfect Meghan weapon. The couple, now cut off from the Royal payroll, needs money. What better source of a few dollars would be her endorsement of the 360 PD Airlite. As I understand it, she could have several 360's, each a color to match her nails on any particular day:

As a registered Republican and dues-paying member of the NRA, I am torn between the necessity for an absolutely unregulated firearms industry and the desire to keep weapons out of the hands of foreign nationals, gang members, and people of certain colors (all of which describe the mulatress in question). The Second Amendment is all about "the security of a free State," and I don't see how that end can be served by allowing a liberal colored woman (three strikes), who has renounced her citizenship in order to join a foreign organization with confirmed ties to the Third Reich, to own a gun. How is our safety assured by enabling those at whom we would point our guns, so as to secure our free State, point their own guns back at us? One of us might get shot! This is why I have long lobbied to have the secular 2nd Amendment repealed and replaced with the relevant scripture, Luke 22:36. Instead of allowing all citizens to own guns, the new amendment would make gun ownership mandatory for the followers of Christ and ban it for His enemies.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I swear every picture I see of them, she is ignoring him. Either he is as dimwitted as he appears or I think he is the racist.




Talking of mystery dimwitted racists, really my money's on....

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I swear every picture I see of them, she is ignoring him. Either he is as dimwitted as he appears or I think he is the racist.

Is that a typo for she, Brother Dr Toole, Sir? Many people are racist against gingers but indicate this politely, in an acceptable way, by simply ignoring them.

As a registered Republican and dues-paying member of the NRA, I am torn between the necessity for an absolutely unregulated firearms industry and the desire to keep weapons out of the hands of foreign nationals...

Is she Canadian then, Brother Lukes? Because she is not a British citizen. The Brits are not fussy, and all you need to do is live there for five years - ideally without libeling the monarch's immediate family . But it seems unlikely that she will ever fulfill even the first requirement, having never managed more than a couple of months at a time without jetting off on another exhausting holiday.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Frankly, these two are of little consequence to me. I checked the LBC Tithing roles and they are not on it.
The woman is a half breed and the man is a souless ginger. It will be nearly impossible for them to go to Heaven without massive infusions of cash to prove to god how important He is to them.
What kind of name is "Archie' for a multiple mixed race niglet?


LBC welcomes all people, but you must be committed.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

The thing that bothers me is what pointy-headed sociologists call class.

If we go way back to the time of slavery, we see Christian white people educating and encouraging slaves to better themselves and move up. The same thing during segregation. White people said, "Keep working, keep getting better and you can drink at our water fountains and go to our schools."

But look at the way it is now. Oprah is a billionaire and Meghan has millions. Meghan's poor white father only lives an hour from her. Will she talk to him? No. It's like she is saying, "I've moved up. What did you say your name is?"

She claims he lied. She sent him a very private letter, he sold some of it to the press and said he had no idea how the press got the letter. When the press said they got it from him he said he wished he had not lied about it.

Now he is issuing a press releases every month until she and Harry talk to him. For some reason this just makes her more angry. You would think she would hire him to do gardening or as a guard the way a wealthy white person would do. It's like there is no gratitude to Christian white people for all the favors they did during the 400 years of slavery.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/meghan-markle-father-thomas-british-press-tabloids/

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

For a couple that are "ex-royalty" and used to live in castles, I'm surprised they don' know about moats when it comes to security. It's time for them to get digging (even the Queen became a truck mechanic in WWII), and maybe Harry wants to install some solar panels while he's at it.

This vacuous couple has become more burdensome the longer they're here. If I'm not mistaken, the tradition of "giving away the bride" means that the British now own her - there should be some grounds for deporting the both of them (how bad can it get - the Canadians didn't want them either).

With all the whining, it almost sounds like they want their own Anthem. Perhaps Cardi B wants to do a "God Save the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's Asses". Meanwhile the latest "woke" call is to ban a cartoon skunk with a French accent - something is really beginning to smell with Meghan and Harry.

Their alleged goal was to live a "private life" away from a "racist" monarchy and the British tabloids - so they buy a $14 million mansion in Hellywood. Then they complain that they lost their "allowance" - what, 40 years old and they still had an allowance? To top it all off, they complain that Archie will now not be able to be called a "Prince" - as if these showflakes never heard of being able to "identify" as a "Prince".

So now the couple is trying to figure out how to make a modest "private life" living - like making podcasts from their mansion. I'm not even sure I could be motivated to pay for a Spotify podcast from these two on "How Jesus Turned My Life Around". Even corrupt Hunter Biden was off making deals on his own, and making sure that the "Big Guy" always got his cut.

After the Oprah interview the MSM is fawning all over Meghan and Harry - for speaking truth to power and bringing down the "monarchy". No one bothered to notice that Harry never apologized for being "white" - nor Meghan for being "half-white".

Someone should open a "Go Fund Me" page for them - maybe all the Hellywood elite will step up and fund them to keep the laugh fest going.

Sweet Jesus, we beseech thee, please find a used Fish and Chips food truck in good mechanical condition for this unhappy couple.

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

And, now, it is revealed that Meghan has complained to the British television network about a morning show segment that featured Piers Morgan. Apparently, Mr. Morgan became a little upset with another co-host about the Meghan & Harry interview that had aired. Then, Meghan wrote to the network to complain, and it was announced shortly thereafter that Mr. Morgan is no longer with the network. Is there no end to Meghan's evil, domineering, bossy attitude? I'm sure the Queen does not want them back in England, but do we need their type here in , causing trouble?

Meghan Markle wrote to ITV's boss to complain about Piers Morgan hours before the Good Morning Britain co-host quit on the day the show scored its highest ever ratings and beat BBC Breakfast, it was revealed today.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...id-6-30am.html

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Poor Mr Morgan only said what everyone outside the media is thinking, i.e. that he did not believe a single word the silly woman said. I have absolutely no idea what she (or her husband) said, but as she is famously litigious I think it best to keep my opinion on the matter to myself.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

I was talking to some of the joo accountants for LBC, and helping ensure the Church gets all the write offs it is entitled too. We found a loop hole and being we are all Children of Christ, the Church is entitled to payments for each member in the amount of $300 per month from the Federal Government. This is going to be placed in the Pastors Discretionary account.

This point of my post is finances. The souless ginger and his half-breed wife are whoring about raking in millions yet I did not see a single contribution to LBC! No doubt at some point God is going to strike with great vengeance upon them and retard Archie.

What is wrong with these people and how can they be so callous!

[Isabella White]

Re: Keep Meghan and Harry Over There

Poor Mr Morgan only said what everyone outside the media is thinking, i.e. that he did not believe a single word the silly woman said. I have absolutely no idea what she (or her husband) said, but as she is famously litigious I think it best to keep my opinion on the matter to myself.

Oh, how I do agree, dear Sister Joanna! Did you happen to see the wedding ceremony of Meghan & Harry, when there was such a big to-do being made of them a few years back? I think it was obvious from that, that she had no intention of being anything other than a "silly woman", as you've said so delicately. Goodness! Just because she could plop a diamond tiara on her head did not disguise the fact that she did not care -- not even enough to comb her hair, and then to trot off to the ceremony wearing a "messy bun"! I said at the time, "mark my words; this is the beginning of trouble", and here we are, and now we are stuck with them living in OUR land! Is it any wonder that the Queen saw the warnings so early on?