X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Red Snowflunky
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    They never existed in reality. It was just stories. And who ever said I'm an athiest? I'm not.

    Wintershifter, you rule. IM me sometime!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    No, it is biologically impossible for a woman to have children by an animal not in her genome. The DNA will not match and the organism could not be conseved.
    If it is impossible how do you explain minotaurs? You would think since the accounts minotaurs from you atheists' hero the Greeks you would have to accept human hybrids occur.

    So much for your "science", even you secularists don't really believe it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wintershifter
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Your welcome Red Snowflake, i like your point of veiw. Oh and to everyone that is reading this my firends label me goth even my goth friends but i dont dress like them, my family is very religous on my mother side and i have no religion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Red Snowflunky
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Thank you, Wintershifter! My point exactly!

    Leave a comment:


  • Wintershifter
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    It is impossable to have an animal and a human to concive a child and if by some ungodly mircle that it did happen then the beast-child would colluspe on its self you may be able to splice animal DNA into a human embryo but if the embroyo did devolop the child would die shorty after birth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Red Snowflunky
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    No, it is biologically impossible for a woman to have children by an animal not in her genome. The DNA will not match and the organism could not be conseved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    That makes no sense biologically, and it makes no sense logically. Humans cannot have offspring by other animals no more than animals can have offspring with humans.
    That's not true. If you read the Bible, you would learn that the reason that bestiality was forbidden is because it CAN create human-animal hybrids.


    Lev 18:23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.

    Notice the reason -- because "it is confusion".

    In John Gill's commentary, he explains that as follows:

    it [is] confusion;

    a mixing of the seed of man and beast together, a blending of different kinds of creatures, a perverting the order of nature, and introducing the utmost confusion of beings, from whence monsters in nature may arise.
    God forbade sex with animals, not just because of moral qualms, but because he doesn't want animal-human hybrid monsters running around. For example, when a bull breeds with a human woman, she gives birth to a minotaur. That's a true science fact right there.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • Red Snowflunky
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Mrs. Rogers View Post
    Why does she call herself Red Snowflake? Wouldn't "Red CoalLump" better suit her ethnic mix? "BrownBloodiedBand-Aid", perhaps? Hmm.... Unless it's a muddy old snowflake she's referring to -- now that would make sense.


    Red is my favorite color and I like snowflakes, I think they're pretty.


    Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire View Post
    Well, that’s nice! I see it as positive discrimination in diversity - I thought I was being polite in inquiring after you.Who’s “Anthony”? Sounds like a homer’s name – no one I know is called “Anthony”! Anyhoo, I was asking about your blackened eyesthis’ll explain it You mean, when you’re on your own, it goes well but not when you’re in company? I think it’s important for a young lady to consider the impact she has on others.

    I couldn’t help noticing that your Beanjun ancestors are a long way off – you’d have thought that the tar-brush would have sort of worked it’s way out by now, wouldn’t you? Are there no more Darkies in your family? Your mother will be able to tell you.
    It's one thing to inquire about my heritage, it is a completly different thing to call me a racial slur.
    Anthony is the first name of my fionce (actually mentioned many times). He doesn't beat me, the irises of my eyes (that area of color around your pupil) are black. I meant that I needed no one's help in discovering this aspect of myself. Being by myself and or in company has no bearing on it. It is a display of my style, if someone doesn't like it they don't have to look at me.
    Furthermore, I know my family history, and I am very proud of half of it. That half that comes from my mother.

    Originally posted by SayvedByTheLord View Post
    This makes no sense. Mesicants are living proof that injuns had carnal knowledge with buffalo.
    That makes no sense biologically, and it makes no sense logically. Humans cannot have offspring by other animals no more than animals can have offspring with humans.

    Leave a comment:


  • SayvedByTheLord
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    The proper term is Mestizo. Meaning that, namely, my Great Grandmother was Mexican and my Great Grandfather was Native American.
    This makes no sense. Mesicants are living proof that injuns had carnal knowledge with buffalo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    Again with the racism?
    Well, that’s nice! I see it as positive discrimination in diversity - I thought I was being polite in inquiring after you.
    And what's that about Anthony mean anyway?
    Who’s “Anthony”? Sounds like a homer’s name – no one I know is called “Anthony”! Anyhoo, I was asking about your blackened eyesthis’ll explain it
    I noticed that black goes well with my hair and eyes on my own.
    You mean, when you’re on your own, it goes well but not when you’re in company? I think it’s important for a young lady to consider the impact she has on others.


    I couldn’t help noticing that your Beanjun ancestors are a long way off – you’d have thought that the tar-brush would have sort of worked it’s way out by now, wouldn’t you? Are there no more Darkies in your family? Your mother will be able to tell you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    Again with the racism? What is your major malfunction, anyway? And what's that about Anthony mean anyway?
    Anthony who? Is he your queer lover?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs. Rogers
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire View Post
    So you're a beaner and an injun? A Beanjun!
    Why does she call herself Red Snowflake? Wouldn't "Red CoalLump" better suit her ethnic mix? "BrownBloodiedBand-Aid", perhaps? Hmm.

    ... Unless it's a muddy old snowflake she's referring to -- now that would make sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ahimaaz Smith
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    Pastor Pistle.... Injun is a racist term.
    Honest injun?

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    Again with the racism? What is your major malfunction, anyway?
    We just believe in calling a spade a spade.

    And what's that about Anthony mean anyway? I noticed that black goes well with my hair and eyes on my own. I mean, they are black...sometimes my eyes shine aubern in the sun though....
    Nobody cares. Really. We're here to save souls, not as fashion consultants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Red Snowflunky
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire View Post
    Good to see your man's doing his job.
    [/color]
    [color=darkred] So you're a beaner and an injun? A Beanjun!

    (Note that I capitalized Beanjun to show respect...)
    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    So you're an injun/meskin hybrid? Does this mean we can hire you as a gardener and then pay you in blankets?
    Again with the racism? What is your major malfunction, anyway? And what's that about Anthony mean anyway? I noticed that black goes well with my hair and eyes on my own. I mean, they are black...sometimes my eyes shine aubern in the sun though....

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: One Question That Begs to be Addressed

    Originally posted by Red Snowflake View Post
    Answers to all: No, I do not own a black sombrero. I don't like hats therefore I don't wear them.

    With this skin complexion, black is a blessing sent by Those On High. Bright colors never have done it for me. The black goes with my hair and my eyes.

    Pastor Pistle.... Injun is a racist term. The proper term is Mestizo. Meaning that, namely, my Great Grandmother was Mexican and my Great Grandfather was Native American.
    So you're an injun/meskin hybrid? Does this mean we can hire you as a gardener and then pay you in blankets?

    Leave a comment:

Working...