[Sitromxe]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Scripture?

[WinnerNotSinner]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Scripture?

Yes. What are you, a retard?

[Sitromxe]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

No, I am not. I think you may have slightly misunderstood my position.
I will rely on a more modern source.



For molecules of a liquid to evaporate, they must be located near the surface, be moving in the proper direction, and have sufficient kinetic energy to overcome liquid-phase intermolecular forces. Only a small proportion of the molecules meet these criteria, so the rate of evaporation is limited. Since the kinetic energy of a molecule is proportional to its temperature, evaporation proceeds more quickly at higher temperatures. As the faster-moving molecules escape, the remaining molecules have lower average kinetic energy, and the temperature of the liquid thus decreases. This phenomenon is also called evaporative cooling. This is why evaporating sweat cools the human body. Evaporation also tends to proceed more quickly with higher flow rates between the gaseous and liquid phase and in liquids with higher vapor pressure. For example, laundry on a clothes line will dry (by evaporation) more rapidly on a windy day than on a still day. Three key parts to evaporation are heat, humidity and air movement.

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporation


Evaporation occurs on the surface of a liquid. The rate of evaporation will remain in proportion to the temperature of the liquid. A number of variables including wind movement and humidity effect the rate of evaporation.

Our planet wouldn't have been hot enough to evaporate such a colossal amount of water in such a small amount of time.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

No, I am not. I think you may have slightly misunderstood my position.
I will rely on a more modern source.



For molecules of a liquid to evaporate, they must be located near the surface, be moving in the proper direction, and have sufficient kinetic energy to overcome liquid-phase intermolecular forces. Only a small proportion of the molecules meet these criteria, so the rate of evaporation is limited. Since the kinetic energy of a molecule is proportional to its temperature, evaporation proceeds more quickly at higher temperatures. As the faster-moving molecules escape, the remaining molecules have lower average kinetic energy, and the temperature of the liquid thus decreases. This phenomenon is also called evaporative cooling. This is why evaporating sweat cools the human body. Evaporation also tends to proceed more quickly with higher flow rates between the gaseous and liquid phase and in liquids with higher vapor pressure. For example, laundry on a clothes line will dry (by evaporation) more rapidly on a windy day than on a still day. Three key parts to evaporation are heat, humidity and air movement.

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaporation


Evaporation occurs on the surface of a liquid. The rate of evaporation will remain in proportion to the temperature of the liquid. A number of variables including wind movement and humidity effect the rate of evaporation.

Our planet wouldn't have been hot enough to evaporate such a colossal amount of water in such a small amount of time.

At first glance, Wikipedia appears above board. Its clever name is a play on the word encyclopedia, implying an unimpeachable and unbiased compilation of information. But like other salacious websites, Wikipedia is a haphazard collection of opinions subjectively presented as fact.In fact, in its quest to make a profit and gain notoriety, Wikipedia appeases special interest influences by selectively presenting information that corresponds with their motivations. Wikipedia's lack of reliability is widely reported. Empirical facts as irrefutable as the life or death status of well known celebrities has been falsely reported on this site. Although instances of its gross inaccuracy have been recently well documented by legitimate journalistic sources like USA Today and Sports Illustrated, Wikipedia continues to pontificate wildly about whatever subject it chooses. One thing is certain: the views expressed by the biased editing of Wikepdia do not necessarily include accurate information about the world in general.

Now let us look at what the Holy Text tell us:

The Flood

Then the FSM saw that the wickedness of Man was great on the earth, and that every thought of the little midget was ruled by his stomach.
Then the FSM said, “Fine, I’ll just cook for myself,” and He produced a great Colander of Goodness and He did collect water in an enormous pot, which he heated; and He did drop in a heaping portion of pasta and slowly simmer the sauce for so long that the original humans weren’t even around any-more when He was finally ready to eat. And He poured the spaghetti and water into the Colander of Goodness, careful to make sure the water went down the drain of His sink. And as He was eating, He vacantly considered where the drain did empty, and the FSM said, “Uh oh.”
Luckily, Noah and Noah’s sons, Ham, Cheese, and Omel, and Noah’s wife and the three wives of his sons with them, had been working on “Big Noah’s Floating Menagerie,” which was to be housed in a giant ark of Noah’s design. On that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the drains of the heavens were opened. And the rain was on the earth forty days and forty nights, and the ark did float but it did stink.
After several battles with Pirates, the ark did finally rest on Mount Ararat, and when the waters receded it was a long walk home for Noah and his family. And no one could locate the unicorn pair, but they did discover Noah’s son Ham in a back chamber of the ark, picking his teeth with an oversized toothpick that remarkably resembled a horn.

Of course is was not all good times. Not everyone was a believer, and some rejected His Word and felt the need to go out on the ocean in their own (probably lame) ships and pick fights with the Pastafarians. Most notable was Noah, of biblical fame, who slapped together a monstrous barge made of wood and whatever else was around – probably dirt, who knows? Noah, well known for his love (Perverted coveting) of animals, always had plenty around. So when he found himself with a lack of building materials, he decided to use hundreds of defenceless animals as ballast – mainly the slowest, dumbest, and most dense that he could come across.

It’s not known exactly what occurred during this time of Noah and the Pirates, but enough historical texts have survived through the years to get a rough picture of the events that transpired. Noah, alone except for his animals/ballast, propelled by jealousy and maybe a group of talking seals, set forth in search of Pastafarians. Unfortunately for Noah, he found one of the most bad-ass Pirate ships around, and started talking way too much smack. The Pastafarians, being above all peaceful, and maybe drunk, ignored his verbal abuse. It was only when Noah, ever the dick, physically attacked the Pastafarian ship by hurling from his bow the pointiest of animals (Possibly these were porcupines. Also, some scholars believe that Noah might have hurled stab-rabbits, a since extinct species of rabbit possessing weapon like points all over its body. Despite their love of sex, the stab-rabbits ultimately went extinct because they could not bring themselves to go through with copulation, the pain being too great – much like modern-day men who are married to fatties.) that the Pastafarians took notice. We are told that the largest, scariest of the Pastafarians swam, or maybe just jumped, from ship to ship – they were that powerful – and confronted Noah.

Immediately seeing the error of his ways, Noah offered some turtles or something as way of apologizing. The Pastafarians probably having plenty of their own turtles, (Giant ones for riding) said no to the deal, and proceeded to intimidate the bejesus out of Noah. We don’t know exactly what was said, but it’s clear that Noah wet himself to such an extent that even the Christians associate him with “the Great Flood” (Although they have wisely developed another description of events.) Needless to say, he never mistreated animals again – not even chickens, who are pretty much asking for it. (There are no mentions of Pirates or grog, and only a few of wenches in the Christian Bible.)

[zzyzx10]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

I would rather not discuss my religious views, as I do not beleive that it is something that should be forced upon people. Theres no reason as to why I should try to convince you, and vice versa. But in response to the criticism of Wikipedia, USA Today itself posted an article regarding Nature's side by side comparison of Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. Whether or not you view Nature as a valid source, you obviously consider USA Today to be one. Considering they used Natures article as a source, your obliged to at least consider it. Wikipedia has also invested a fair amount in revising articles. Though it is arguable that it shouldn't be cited in a college essay, it is still reliable enough for common knowledge.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2005-12-14-nature-wiki_x.htm

Thank You

[Lisa H]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

I would rather not discuss my religious views, as I do not beleive that it is something that should be forced upon people. Theres no reason as to why I should try to convince you, and vice versa. But in response to the criticism of Wikipedia, USA Today itself posted an article regarding Nature's side by side comparison of Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. Whether or not you view Nature as a valid source, you obviously consider USA Today to be one. Considering they used Natures article as a source, your obliged to at least consider it. Wikipedia has also invested a fair amount in revising articles. Though it is arguable that it shouldn't be cited in a college essay, it is still reliable enough for common knowledge.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2005-12-14-nature-wiki_x.htm

Thank You

If you did not want to force your views on people here, then why did you make that post.

If you don't like our views, then why are you here.

You must hate God for not wanting to listen to him.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Pasta Boy, shall we assume that Omel had a daughter and named her Omelette?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Pasta Boy, shall we assume that Omel had a daughter and named her Omelette?

Well that would be something that should have been covered in your literature the . The True Holy text only mentions Noah and his sons briefly. The seems to go into much more detail when trying to make up stuff to explain why he was such a pratt.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Well that would be something that should have been covered in your literature the . The True Holy text only mentions Noah and his sons briefly. The seems to go into much more detail when trying to make up stuff to explain why he was such a pratt.

Noah didn't have a son named Omel, nor one named Cheese:

Even though God had decided by Noah’s time that people should only live to be 120 years old (Gen. 6:3), He liked Noah a lot and let him live to be much older.

When he was 500 years old (Gen. 5:32), Noah had three sons. He named them Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

About that time, God looked around the Earth, and saw that there was all sorts of wickedness and sin. People had, in the 2,000 years since Creation, forgotten or started ignoring His rules. There was miscenegation going on — that’s the grownup term for interracial marriage. Giants were marrying normal humans (Gen. 6:4), instead of keeping to their own kind. God hates that!

I figured since you were making up things, you'd make up a daughter for Omel as well.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

No, I am not. I think you may have slightly misunderstood my position.
I will rely on a more modern source.
...
Evaporation occurs on the surface of a liquid. The rate of evaporation will remain in proportion to the temperature of the liquid. A number of variables including wind movement and humidity effect the rate of evaporation.

Our planet wouldn't have been hot enough to evaporate such a colossal amount of water in such a small amount of time.

You've given a modern source. Then you extrapolate from that to make a wild, entirely unsupported claim about Biblical times. Why don't you get a reliable quote from a contemporary source (i.e. the Bible) proving that God didn't make the earth hot enough to evaporate all that water?

[WrongheadedThinker1991]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

I am, and my mind is free from the chains in which religious peoples minds aren't.

I'm not on here to insult Christians but....WAKE UP!! All these beliefs are made up on behalf of fear of the unknown!

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

I am, and my mind is free from the chains in which religious peoples minds aren't.

I'm not on here to insult Christians but....WAKE UP!! All these beliefs are made up on behalf of fear of the unknown!

Boy, you need to read THIS.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Noah didn't have a son named Omel, nor one named Cheese:



I figured since you were making up things, you'd make up a daughter for Omel as well.

Look it is not my fault that your special book has missed a few details out.
It clearly states in the Gospel
The Holy Noodle
The Flood

Luckily, Noah and Noah’s sons, Ham, Cheese, and Omel, and Noah’s wife and the three wives of his sons with them, had been working on “Big Noah’s Floating Menagerie,” which was to be housed in a giant ark of Noah’s design. On that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the drains of the heavens were opened. And the rain was on the earth forty days and forty nights, and the ark did float but it did stink.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Look it is not my fault that your special book has missed a few details out.
It clearly states in the Gospel
The Holy Noodle
The Flood

Aren't Pastafarians Last Tuesdayians? If the world was created last Tuesday according to you guys were do you get The Flood in that. More proof your pirates are crazy.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Are You an Atheist?

Aren't Pastafarians Last Tuesdayians? If the world was created last Tuesday according to you guys were do you get The Flood in that. More proof your pirates are crazy.

No the world was created 5,000 years ago,

A Condensed History of the WorldFive Thousand Years Ago:
The Beginning

THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER created the universe and a bunch of planets, including Earth.

The Holy NoodleThe First Day: Light

THEN THE FSM SAID, “Let there be light,” and there was light. And the FSM adjusted his willowy eyestalks and saw that the light was good; and the FSM divided the light from the darkness. He called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night or “Prime Time.” So the evening and the morning were the first day.

Your post is more proof that you Jealousians fail you engage your brains.