Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

The liberal bias at "Conserva"pedia, the untrustworthy encyclopedia, has reached new depths. Consider the article on faith. An editor whose user page identifies him as a Biblical inerrantist added a pertinent passage from Deuteronomy on that subject that is vitally important to all saved Christians. So how did the "conservatives" react? They revealed themselves to be liberal wolves in conservative sheep's clothing. Take a look at this edit, where they deleted it, and look at the reason they gave. That's right; they actually called God's Word "liberal junk." I'm certainly glad I'm not going to be in their shoes in the day of judgment.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

I long suspected Conservapedia as some kind of collective of homers, atheists and drunks with no lives out to attack Christianity. This just proves it. Not only do their wipe this ass with The Bible but they are proud of it.

[lilith]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

I long suspected Conservapedia as some kind of collective of homers, atheists and drunks with no lives out to attack Christianity. This just proves it. Not only do their wipe this ass* with The Bible but they are proud of it.

*Apparently,it's especially soft.

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

*Apparently,it's especially soft.

Yes, because it is filled with the gentle softness of GOD's love. Is someone bound a book with your hide, it could probably be used on the end of a pole as a battleaxe!

[lilith]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

Yes, because it is filled with the gentle softness of GOD's love.* Is someone bound a book with your hide, it could probably be used on the end of a pole as a battleaxe!

* On the contrary;because it's pulp fiction.

[Bryan Tamariki]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

The liberal bias at "Conserva"pedia, the untrustworthy encyclopedia, has reached new depths. Consider the article on faith. An editor whose user page identifies him as a Biblical inerrantist added a pertinent passage from Deuteronomy on that subject that is vitally important to all saved Christians. So how did the "conservatives" react? They revealed themselves to be liberal wolves in conservative sheep's clothing. Take a look at this edit, where they deleted it, and look at the reason they gave. That's right; they actually called God's Word "liberal junk." I'm certainly glad I'm not going to be in their shoes in the day of judgment.

Vile heathens! Then they follow that up by using a Mooseslime definition:

The word for "faith" in Islam is "iman."

That sounds like some sort of Homer word!

[H. Montague Worthington]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

Those aren't REAL conservatives. They're "phony conservatives" that are rooting for the downfall of America and a single world government with Bill Clinton and Kofi Annan as the Homer Emperors in Coital Embrace.

[Wash O'Hanley]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

Nothing with the word "opedia" at the end of it can really be Conservative.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Conservapedia censors Scripture, calls it "liberal junk"

Those aren't REAL conservatives. They're "phony conservatives" that are rooting for the downfall of America and a single world government with Bill Clinton and Kofi Annan as the Homer Emperors in Coital Embrace.

Indeed. Now, they are out to destroy the sacred institution of the Biblically ordained family. In the article on marriage, one of the Christ-hating liberal sysops deleted the entire section on marriage in the Old Testament and locked the article so that the real conservatives at "Conserva"pedia (both of them, judging from the article's talk page) couldn't re-insert anything Biblical.