THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

[see_the_light]

Brothers and Sisters

Do avoid any school in england.

I was horrified with this article and praying that no TRUE CHRISTIAN be forced to raise their GOD FEARING children in that depraved country.

December 15, 2006 -- BRITISH actor James Purefoy doesn't open up to Out magazine on why he quit halfway through the production of "V for Vendetta" - but he does open up about his sexuality. Purefoy told the mag that while he's straight, he will "never say never" when it comes to having sex with a man. "Anyone who went to an English [private] school in the 1970s will have had some kind of a gay experience," he said. "You bang 500 adolescent hormonal boys together at exactly the time when they're exploring their sexuality, and don't be surprised if some shenanigan comes out of it."


PRAY FOR GOD'S INTERVENTION!

[ProdigalSon]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Well, this is not surprising for a place that bans handguns and butchers God's favorite language with that sissified accent.

[see_the_light]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Well, this is not surprising for a place that bans handguns and butchers God's favorite language with that sissified accent.

True enough!

LET US PRAY!

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

I was horrified with this article and praying that no TRUE CHRISTIAN be forced to raise their GOD FEARING children in that depraved country.

PRAY FOR GOD'S INTERVENTION!

There's a lot of good reasons why the Mayflower left and took 99% of England's Christians with it, you know.

[see_the_light]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

There's a lot of good reasons why the Mayflower left and took 99% of England's Christians with it, you know.

I see....

But I'd rather have my eyes torn out than having to see it too close...

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

So.....

You're accusing the English of being homosexual.....

The same english that had revised your Bible which you so wholly worship.

*Cough.*

^____^

I'm not saying anything though. But I think you can figure out my point.

[Talitha]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

So.....

You're accusing the English of being homosexual.....

The same english that had revised your Bible which you so wholly worship.

*Cough.*

^____^

I'm not saying anything though. But I think you can figure out my point.

King James was an Pre-American at Heart.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Maybe, but he still was English. You can't avoid the fact that if he had a passport, it'd be for England.

Therefore, he was also a homosexual.

^___^

It's ammusing that a homosexual reworked your bible, in order for you, generations later, to take it and use it to bash the same people that made it.

Amazing, ne?

Or, maybe I'm wrong?

Maybe all English AREN'T homosexual after all.

[Talitha]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Being pre-American means that those homerish tendencies of all British Males just weren't there.

God would never give such an important task to a faggot Homer Englishman.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

I don't see why.

Wasn't someone on this very forum who claimed that "God" uses homosexuals as tools?

Afterall, one pawn is equal to another pawn.

But I have a question.

Why would an "All Powerfull, All Mighty" god NEED humans to write his bible for him anyway?

Is he too lazy or something?

And if it was written once, why does it have to be revised?

Did god decide that some parts needed to be changed?

[Talitha]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

The King James Bible (1611) is Gods ONLY word.
God is certainly not lazy but he had plenty more important things to do.
Why do you think it was a King chosen to get this job done?

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

I don't see why.

Wasn't someone on this very forum who claimed that "God" uses homosexuals as tools?

Afterall, one pawn is equal to another pawn.

But I have a question.

Why would an "All Powerfull, All Mighty" god NEED humans to write his bible for him anyway?

Is he too lazy or something?

And if it was written once, why does it have to be revised?

Did god decide that some parts needed to be changed?

Touché.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Maybe, but he still was English. You can't avoid the fact that if he had a passport, it'd be for England.

But he didn't have a passport, and the reason he didn't have a passport was because he didn't live in modern times. I refer you to my previous post:

There's a lot of good reasons why the Mayflower left and took 99% of England's Christians with it, you know.

The Mayflower left in 1620, prior to 1620 there was nothing shameful about being English. Are you familiar with the idea that things in 2007 might be different to things in 1611?

And if it was written once, why does it have to be revised?

Umm, it doesn't?

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

The King James Bible (1611) is Gods ONLY word.
God is certainly not lazy but he had plenty more important things to do.
Why do you think it was a King chosen to get this job done?

Yeah, I can understand how a meglomaniac can be busy. You know. Killing, slaughtering innocent people. Causing famines and diseases and such.

But, weren't the Dead Sea Scrolls, which predate the King James Bible, also God's word?

And what about the Torah? AKA the Old Testimate?

And, while we're on the topic, the Holy Bible?

You can't revise NOTHING, without the original.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Umm, it doesn't?

Well yeah, I mean God is perfect right? So why wasn't the Bible Perfect?