[handmaiden]

Re: No, "Lie for Jesus" is not all bad for Anti Abortion Christians

If we're going to do this, let's do it right. We're going to need to set up a first-class auction site for the babies to maximize our profits. We should also have a trading operation that buys babies to hold in our inventory. That way we will never run out, and we can wholesale any surplus babies to other adoption agencies. Finally, somebody needs to make sure that people from the lesser races don't adopt any white babies--after all, our religious principles come before making profits!

How about this for our first promotion: "Adopt your first baby from Landover Child Placement and get a free gun!"

Amen, brother! We need to prevent outcomes like this one. A Black woman and her brownish partner adopted no fewer than three white children. And as far as I could glean from the story, no money exchanged hands.

Truly, it is situations such as this that cause so much concern and consternation for God-fearing GOP candidates like, Randy Bishop, who wisely observed that nowadays one “Can’t even watch a college basketball tournament without commercials telling me I have to feel guilty because I think a family should be a White mom, a White dad and White kids. They want us to die and go away."

As Mr. Bishop would no doubt agree, white children belong with white families, and stopping abortion isn't just about saving the life of a child, but that of our entire race whose future is at stake.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: No, "Lie for Jesus" is not all bad for Anti Abortion Christians

Amen, brother! We need to prevent outcomes like this one. A Black woman and her brownish partner adopted no fewer than three white children. And as far as I could glean from the story, no money exchanged hands.

Truly, it is situations such as this that cause so much concern and consternation for God-fearing GOP candidates like, Randy Bishop, who wisely observed that nowadays one “Can’t even watch a college basketball tournament without commercials telling me I have to feel guilty because I think a family should be a White mom, a White dad and White kids. They want us to die and go away."

As Mr. Bishop would no doubt agree, white children belong with white families, and stopping abortion isn't just about saving the life of a child, but that of our entire race whose future is at stake.

Well, a White Family would consist of a White mom, a White dad and White kids. It's sort of there in the name. There are also Chinese Families (until recently there would not be "Chinese kids" due to the 1 child policy and therefore 0 aunts, 0 uncles, 0 cousins, 0 nieces and 0 nephews) but I digress. What would a Ugandan family consist of? Let me see: 1 Pitcairn Islander mom? and 1 Abkhazian dad? with 1 each of French, Japanese & Vaticanian kids for a family of 5? Unlikely I'd have thought. But the fact they'd actually be 5 Ugandans doesn't mean all the Japanese need to feel guilty.

SOCIOLOGY

When the Pastors advised against reading sociology, I gave up the dreadful subject immediately but nevertheless had picked up some of its buzzwords. They say that wealthy places are better off because they're more productive. What it takes 10 or 20 or more likely 150 people all year to grow in one place (using single-furrow hoes and scythes) can be produced in a month somewhere else because they're using autonomous tractors. I didn't know what that was so looked something up. EDIT: The most recent figure I've heard (today) is 3,000% productivity increase which means the year's production requires 12⅙ days rather than a month but that did not include autonomous devices.

TRACTOR 1 — I have no idea what this machine is dragging along behind itself but I don't want it to run over me. The meadow looks about a square mile. Imagine doing that with an Egyptian hoe or even using goat power. The animal whatever it was needs to eat and the amount of work done determines the minimum energy requirement (food, in this case) which would be significant but less than half the crop, depending on species. Goats I believe are fairly efficient.

TRACTOR 2 (live human shown for scale) — Here we see a farmer controlling several tractors at once. Actually, they'll be controlling themselves according to a program he's uploaded and although the farm is more scenic than my previous example, the aesthetics of the tractor balance things up a bit. Soon he will go home and do something else, such as invent a self-operating combine harvester.

From the picture I assume it's a bulk-handling operation (nowhere to store the grain) so a self-driving truck needs to follow along. I've added a driverless truck and an arrow; the extra tractors with live human are towing something with attachments probably suitable for grain transfer. The output from a single farmer is increasing exponentially with time so why do we need more and more workers? The reality is that less and less are actually required.

This is what happens when Jesus is removed from the school curriculum.