No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

[Johny Joe Hold]

It's logical to many people in our city that Freehold would have one of those "pregnancy centers" that anti-abortion groups all over the U. S. operate. I get asked why we don't have one often. Pregnancy Centers are homey and friendly places that welcome pregnant women while they await the birth of their illegitimate babies. The women are given care, diapers and support that might be lacking in their own home or neighborhood.

I have not allowed any of these places because they encourage sexual promiscuity. Young women ask, "Why worry about a pregnancy. Have fun and the Pregnancy Center will take care of me." This certainly is not what Jesus wants. Pregnancies need to be miserable, so harlots get the message.

My suggestion is we do not attend or support the reopening to the pregnancy center that got fire-bombed recently. Those who put up money and time getting it repaired should realize they are encouraging sin.

Pregnancy center celebrates 'miracle' reopening after firebombing | U.S. News (christianpost.com)

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

The women are given care, diapers and support that might be lacking in their own home or neighborhood.

Sounds like socialism to me. No wonder Freehold doesn't have a place like that. And they're magnets for feminoid terrorists with molotov cocktails and explosives. A fire could potentially spread and damage another Freehold resident's property. Good call as always, Mayor Hold.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

I agree it's dangerous to operate these centers, even if they are a front for pro-life activism. The danger is that some on our side are none too bright and may mistake them for Planned Parenthood. This could lead to tragic firebombing incidents and death threats.

[its_faith]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

They will just attract knocked up harlots who are looking to find a sucker for a fraud paternity lawsuit.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

The only kind of pregnancy center we would tolerate would be one where Pastor Zeke came by regularly and preached shame on the women for their sin. We all know the women would leave. There is not much point of even starting such a place. I say let pregnant women drain the bank accounts of other churches. If they close it's all the better for Landover Baptist.

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Mayor, the political reality is that following Kansas, the states are now crumpling to liberals' demands for death sacrifice. I think we're going to have to plan on some kind of compromise.

Republican consultants for Senate and House campaigns ... have started advising Republicans to endorse bans that allow exceptions for pregnancies from rape or incest or those that threaten the life of the mother. They have told candidates to emphasize care for women during and after their pregnancies.

Perhaps one way forward is for Freehold to only offer abortions to existing prisoners or those that voluntarily admit to the crime of murder and receive a nominal year or two in prison.

[WWJDnow]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

If women don't want to get pregnant because of rape or incest, their bodies have a way of rejecting the pregnancy. So it's their own fault that they're in this state. We don't need pregnancy centers, we need whipping centers to teach them not to sin again.

[Dennis Lukes]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Yes. If a pregnant woman doesn't have a husband to protect and provide for her during the incubation period, she doesn't deserve it. Pro-life pregnancy centers are a feminist plot to undermine the role of the husband/father in society. Now instead of women saying "I'll go out and have unprotected sex with multiple partners and if I get pregnant, I'll just get an abortion," they'll say "I'll go out and have unprotected sex with multiple partners and if I get pregnant, I'll just go to a pregnancy center," which is almost as bad.

There's only one acceptable way for women to conduct themselves, and that's the Biblical way.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Pregnancies need to be miserable, so harlots get the message.

Amen to that!

Eve ate from the forbidden fruit. Genesis 3:13 tells us she even blamed the serpent for her sin instead of taking responsibility.

Genesis 3:16 clearly states that Eve and every women ever born for all eternity will be severely punished for this with pains in childbearing and painful labor. A very well deserved punishment for Eve and every other women ever born for all eternity.

Genesis 3:16 "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children..."

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Yes. If a pregnant woman doesn't have a husband to protect and provide for her during the incubation period, she doesn't deserve it.

At a certain point the argument gets absurd. The incubator provides a stable environment for the man's seed to blossom into an actual living human being. Medically these days we can incubate semen in a jar, so what, now we have to give rights to jars?

[WWJDnow]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Q: What's the difference between a woman and a jar?

A: One's a thing that's amazing when first acquired but needs to be discarded after it has served its purpose. The other is a food container.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

They just keep coming, those misguided Christian pundits who think Christians should do more for women. The link demands Pregnancy Centers and like groups make sure pregnant women "never feel they are in this alone." Friends, a suffering pregnant woman is one learning her lesson. The time spent in being pregnant is a teaching moment.

Then, there are the "political expert" pundits. Now there is one studying the pro-harlot vote in Kansas. He found there was a big increase in voter registration there. Those registering were young and 70% were women. This means, he said, Republicans need to cater to women voters.

This is wrong, too. Republicans need to instruct both men and women that a woman is to register only when given permission by her husband. In addition, when a woman is voting her husband should be looking over her shoulder to see she doesn't vote women's lib.

What abortion built | Voice (christianpost.com)

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Mr. Mayor, what pleases me is that Landover's leading male intellectuals are solving this problem in parallel with the Christian Post's John Stonestreet.

John serves as president of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. He’s a sought-after author and speaker on areas of faith and culture, theology, worldview, education and apologetics.

This somewhat mirrors my own expertise in theophysics, physicotheology, international geopolitics and, of course, as a trained medical man, "women's problems".

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Satan has now sweet-talked Walmart, the nation's largest employer, into offering women money to travel somewhere for an abortion. Sam Walton must be rolling over in his grave.

Walmart will pay for 100 miles of travel to an abortionist. This will pay for harlots who work in headquarters, Bentonville, Arkansas, to drive to Kansas where women voted to kill every baby Jesus gives them. Walmart did limit abortions to women whose pregnancy developed some problem, but we know women and doctors can cheat about this. To say the least, I am appalled.

https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2022/08/walmart-will-now-offer-abortion-coverage-and-travel-support-for-employees-in-certain-cases.html

[handmaiden]

Re: No Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers in Freehold

Thank you for bringing this information to our attention, Brother Mayor. Walmart is now Satan's One Stop Shop.