[Jo Freddie]

Re: *sigh*

You said, "they are not amputees".

"They" may be correctly used to refer to a single person of indeterminate gender (instead of he/she or him/her); however, in that case, you would correctly write, "they are not an amputee".

As written, you have multiple partners.

If you have only one, then your use of "they" can only lead me to assume that you do not know the sex of your own partner.

Might I add, Ew.

Finally, what you are writing ("Rody") is pronounced like the nickname for a rhododendron ("rhodie"). Do you mean "Roddy", which would rhyme with "Noddy" (and come close to, say, "Naughty")?

It's a shame when a Brit doesn't understand basic rules of English grammar and spelling.

OK Roders, looking back at my post I accept that I should have said "they are not an amputee."

Now when it comes to my partner I know, and am perfectly happy with, what gender they are, it is YOU who does not know what gender they are and this does not cause me any problems at all. I see no reason to dispel or confirm any warped theories you have about my sexuality. I know my what sexuality is and I am happy with it. I feel no need to clarify what it is. I have no desire to have sexual relations with ANYONE here, so my sexuality is not relevant in this situation.

The only reason I can think of that my sexuality is of such interest to you Roders is that you want to have some sort of relationship with me, well I am sorry Roders that is just not going to happen.

[HTannor]

Re: *sigh*

Well, I see the supposedly "offending" picture is gone.

Probably just as well since we don't get many New Hampshireites on our forum. And the ones we do get are pretty ugly and always clash with the uncommonly attractive people we have here.

[logicalthinker]

Re: *sigh*

thank you.