[logicalthinker]

Re: *sigh*

thank you.

[HTannor]

Re: *sigh*

Well, I see the supposedly "offending" picture is gone.

Probably just as well since we don't get many New Hampshireites on our forum. And the ones we do get are pretty ugly and always clash with the uncommonly attractive people we have here.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: *sigh*

You said, "they are not amputees".

"They" may be correctly used to refer to a single person of indeterminate gender (instead of he/she or him/her); however, in that case, you would correctly write, "they are not an amputee".

As written, you have multiple partners.

If you have only one, then your use of "they" can only lead me to assume that you do not know the sex of your own partner.

Might I add, Ew.

Finally, what you are writing ("Rody") is pronounced like the nickname for a rhododendron ("rhodie"). Do you mean "Roddy", which would rhyme with "Noddy" (and come close to, say, "Naughty")?

It's a shame when a Brit doesn't understand basic rules of English grammar and spelling.

OK Roders, looking back at my post I accept that I should have said "they are not an amputee."

Now when it comes to my partner I know, and am perfectly happy with, what gender they are, it is YOU who does not know what gender they are and this does not cause me any problems at all. I see no reason to dispel or confirm any warped theories you have about my sexuality. I know my what sexuality is and I am happy with it. I feel no need to clarify what it is. I have no desire to have sexual relations with ANYONE here, so my sexuality is not relevant in this situation.

The only reason I can think of that my sexuality is of such interest to you Roders is that you want to have some sort of relationship with me, well I am sorry Roders that is just not going to happen.

[logicalthinker]

Re: *sigh*

Why do you continue to avoid the question. CAN I OR CAN I NOT DELETE THE PICTURE? And does that link you gave me mean NO ONE has rights here either? Because last I checked in America, everyone has rights.

CAN I OR CAN I NOT DELETE THE PICTURE? IF I CAN, PLEASE TELL ME HOW. Thank you.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: *sigh*

That is just plain insulting. New Hampshireites are not butt ugly. I am not trying to get laid. And ignoring your blatant insults, I notice you're avoiding the question I started this thread to get an answer for: HOW DO I DELETE THE PICTURE?

While the internets might seem to be "free" to you, this particular corner of the internets is a privately owned Christian forum. The rights you have on this forum are listed HERE. Please contact a Pastor immediately if you feel that any of your rights have been violated.

[logicalthinker]

Re: *sigh*

Why are we still discussing that pirate when we clearly have a problem with the butt-ugly New Hampshireite who's having a problem getting laid finding his true self on our Godly™ forum.

I mean that poor soul couldn't find happiness with his own hand is still searching for whatever ugly broad he can find in his heathen home state true salvation and has come here for our help.

How can we refuse him?

That is just plain insulting. New Hampshireites are not butt ugly. I am not trying to get laid. And ignoring your blatant insults, I notice you're avoiding the question I started this thread to get an answer for: HOW DO I DELETE THE PICTURE?

[HTannor]

Re: *sigh*

Why are we still discussing that pirate when we clearly have a problem with the butt-ugly New Hampshireite who's having a problem getting laid finding his true self on our Godly™ forum.

I mean that poor soul couldn't find happiness with his own hand is still searching for whatever ugly broad he can find in his heathen home state true salvation and has come here for our help.

How can we refuse him?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: *sigh*

And i'm definitely not a warlock. And if I was, you WOULD actually kidnap me and put me in the wilderness to be shot at your leisure?

Read the Hunger Games by Suzzanne Collins. It's almost EXACTLY like that. The main charactor isn't accused of witchcraft though.

It is entirely possible that a neighbor of yours could document that you are a warlock or sorcerer, and then contact TermiWix(tm).

TermiWix, your witch removal service, traps, removes, and releases witches, warlocks, sorcerers, and the like using humane live-capture traps. They are transported to the Freehold area and held in a secure facility in the woods where they are given the opportunity to learn about Jesus and repent of their demon-worship.

That reminds me, I need to announce the next release of witches for the hunt.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: *sigh*

As I was not referring you or I the use of the third-person pronoun "they" is correct. I do understand that English is a foreign language to you Rody.

You said, "they are not amputees".

"They" may be correctly used to refer to a single person of indeterminate gender (instead of he/she or him/her); however, in that case, you would correctly write, "they are not an amputee".

As written, you have multiple partners.

If you have only one, then your use of "they" can only lead me to assume that you do not know the sex of your own partner.

Might I add, Ew.

Finally, what you are writing ("Rody") is pronounced like the nickname for a rhododendron ("rhodie"). Do you mean "Roddy", which would rhyme with "Noddy" (and come close to, say, "Naughty")?

It's a shame when a Brit doesn't understand basic rules of English grammar and spelling.

[HTannor]

Re: *sigh*

I honestly just want it changed. ........so someone can tell me how to delete it?

Are you saying people from New Hampshire don't look like that? You "Down East" types constantly amaze me worrying about how you look.

Okay, granted, you don't all look like Brad Pitt, but just accept the appearance that we have come to know.

I doubt the females in your state know any better and you might be "quite a catch" for one of them.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: *sigh*

And i'm definitely not a warlock. And if I was, you WOULD actually kidnap me and put me in the wilderness to be shot at your leisure?

We are instructed by God to obey secular law. You would not be kidnapped or shot.

Once the constitution has been replaced with the Bible, however, expect to be hauled up before a judge to pay for your crimes. But again, you would not be kidnapped. You would be lawfully arrested.

[logicalthinker]

Re: *sigh*

And i'm definitely not a warlock. And if I was, you WOULD actually kidnap me and put me in the wilderness to be shot at your leisure?

Read the Hunger Games by Suzzanne Collins. It's almost EXACTLY like that. The main charactor isn't accused of witchcraft though.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: *sigh*

I honestly just want it changed. Can we please just halt the arguement for a moment so someone can tell me how to delete it?

We already have. Prove it's not you by providing a real picture.

[logicalthinker]

Re: *sigh*

I honestly just want it changed. Can we please just halt the arguement for a moment so someone can tell me how to delete it?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: *sigh*

Nice quote mining. Typical sleaze from a typical LIEberal. Now let's see the FULL quote of what I said...

Look I know the admins forced this avatar on me, you know they have forced this avatar on me, and they know they have forced this avatar on me. My money is on Ms DeWitt being the admin responsible.