[Bible Student]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

What can I say? The Force of God is with me...

Being full of gas, should not be interpreted as "The Force of God." You are going to Hell for blasphemy.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

I have it on excellent authority that he's in prison in Turkey.

So he's doing well, then . . .

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

You know, after all this, I'm starting to miss Father Martian.

At least he could write coherent sentences and was who he said he was, even if he WAS a Mary-worshiping, ring-kissing, cracker-adoring Papist.

Yeah, whatever happened to him? I didn't have him down as a the first suspect in the abuse investigation but then I might be too trusting... which is just the sort of thing that they want...

I have it on excellent authority that he's in prison in Turkey.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

The demons that had convinced him he was a prophet turned violent on us. He had to be restrained.

Just think. If he gets his copyrights and finds a publisher, he could be foisting this steaming pile of heresy just in time for next years Christmas buying season.

Mary Martin, or this other fellow (Swiffer, is it?) with the super fantastical imaginary Bible version?

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Yeah, whatever happened to him? I didn't have him down as a the first suspect in the abuse investigation but then I might be too trusting... which is just the sort of thing that they want...

The demons that had convinced him he was a prophet turned violent on us. He had to be restrained.

Just think. If he gets his copyrights and finds a publisher, he could be foisting this steaming pile of heresy just in time for next years Christmas buying season.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Yeah, whatever happened to him? I didn't have him down as a the first suspect in the abuse investigation but then I might be too trusting... which is just the sort of thing that they want...

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

You know, after all this, I'm starting to miss Father Martian.

At least he could write coherent sentences and was who he said he was, even if he WAS a Mary-worshiping, ring-kissing, cracker-adoring Papist.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Mr Rodimer! blah blah not responding to your repeated questions blah!

I have asked you for information on your "version" and about you, many times over. I have requested:

Your name, since you must be a scholar of some renown to be fluent in three dead languages.

Your credentials.

A sample of your "version". A chapter or two should suffice, with information explaining how yours is superior.

Why do you refuse to acknowledge, much less respond to, these simple requests?

Is it because you are a God-mocking fraud?

I believe it is.

Prove me wrong.

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Levi, your not a poopy head, your a wanker with no sincerity, or maybe a "lewd fellow of the baser sort" or maybe "a low life" or maybe a "scumbag" or may be "a loser" or maybe "a brigand" or maybe "an indecent fellow of the uncivilized type" or maybe "mommas boy" or maybe "an out and out dropkick" certainly not dinky Di, that's for sure (Dinky Di is aussie slang for "real". Honestly, faggot's have got more chance of into heaven than you. You better change your waaays boooy! LOL

Thank you for proving yourself to be nothing, but a fraud.

As always, Jesus wins in the end.

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Levi, your not a poopy head, your a wanker with no sincerity, or maybe a "lewd fellow of the baser sort" or maybe "a low life" or maybe a "scumbag" or may be "a loser" or maybe "a brigand" or maybe "an indecent fellow of the uncivilized type" or maybe "mommas boy" or maybe "an out and out dropkick" certainly not dinky Di, that's for sure (Dinky Di is aussie slang for "real". Honestly, faggot's have got more chance of into heaven than you. You better change your waaays boooy! LOL

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

I can't answer the questions you pose, so I will resort to calling you names.

Levi Jones.. You are a poopy head!

[Didymus Much]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

...and none of it holds weight or credibility...

Wow. You rewrote the whole Bible all by yourself? Yet, when asked (repeatedly) for any supporting evidence, you got nothing? In terms you may be familiar with:

T.I.T.S.* or GTFO

Turn in the Scripture (show us something).

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.

And to think you came here whining about how people use ad hominem attacks.

[Levi Jones]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Since when does not sharing your deluded belief about the king james bible constitute God-mocking Mr Rodimer. You are no different than the Pharisee's who accused jesus of casting out demons by the king of demons. Nasty finger pointing based in blind self-righteous pride is very much an infraction of Christian meekness and God is frowning on you. I do not see any evidence of "faith working through love" coming from you. Every cheap quick-fire rebuttal in here constitutes, well, "Nothing really", so cut the crap false accuser (Isn't that one of Satan's titles?) and get off your high horse. I'm the one who God has used to being the truth of His word to the modern world, not you, so it's about time you took a more decent approach in conversing with me because God is watching Mr. Cynical (untrusting of other peoples nature's), skepticism (tending to look on the negative side of things), and nonchalance (cold, hard, and unfeeling) are not God sanctioned attitudes, and yelling from the sidelines will get you nowhere, so get a life and come back and talk to me when you know what you're talking about...

It looks like you need to spend more time working on your heresy translation instead of coming up with insults.

You aren't that good at them, anyway. Still waiting for your answers to my questions.

[sweeper]

Re: King-James-Only? WRONG!!!!

Come on Mr Rodimer! Tell me, how does basing all your faith on a flawed translation of the bible, simply to offset your insecurity in the world, constitute godliness. "and they marveled when they noticed the apostles were "unlearned and ignorant men". "God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise". Do i need credentials do i Mr Rodimer, or do you speak in words which reinforce your carnality. "Not in words which mans wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches". Do you have more authority than the word of God! Do you? For i could not speak to you as to spiritual. but as to carnal".