[XeyedJack]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

“And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners? / But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.”

No servant of Christ can fail to be a servant of truth, and no servant of truth can fail to be a servant of Christ. So, when one such fear of Truth in a "Church", one must conclude that Christ has departed from that Church.

Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ still has a place in his heart for you, if you submit to Him and let the light of Truth into your hearts. Do not let your hearts be stones! Let not yourselves commit the sin of Peter! For Truth is a test of your hearts; let them not fail you. For if you have build a Church on sand, it will be shaken down about you.

Open your hearts, and minds to Christ's salvation. How? By understanding that truth is a double edged sword. Yes, truth is a sword. You can use it to slay demons. But just as how, when wielded, it cuts away the scales from your eyes, it also cuts into your own flesh, it pierces your own flesh, it crucifies your own flesh. Truth HURTS. And if you let Truth in your heart, if you humble yourself and crucify yourself FOR truth, even as you may cry, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?", your former self dies to be reborn as in the bosom of Christ.

[Nobar King]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Believe in genetics and atoms all you want

yeah, if I want to get sick.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

That boy is a credit to his race. Jesus gave him the brains of a normal man, so that he might better rebuke the monkey worshipers. Glory!!

[Joshua Brooks]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Attention minions of the Allied Atheist Agenda:

There is absolutely positively no evidence whatsoever for the idiotic concept that is evilution. The skeletal remains of various unrelated and completely distinct species of animal life does not prove that one creature transformed into another.

Even if we were to assume that genetics are a reality and that human being contained within their genetic code deactivated reptile DNA it stands to reason that Jesus could simply turn these various genetic instructions on and off at his leisure. According to monkey worshippers birds are dinosuars (behemoths & leviathans). A chicken could give birth to an ancient Tyranasaurus behemoth by deactivating all the genes that produce chicken organs and reactivating all the deactivated T-Rex genes. Evilution becomes an unnecessary process seeing that Jesus could just flip a few million switches and give the atoms different construction instructions.

Let's face the fact here. Assuming atoms and all that hogwash was real you'd have to admit that the laws of physics have been the laws of physics from the so-called Big Bang up to the present day. That means that your genetics already existed from the beginning. Likewise, chicken DNA existed before chickens existed. This would indicate that a great plan was already pre-conceived. Your mythological DNA would be nothing more than program code that Jesus engineered and alters as he sees fit to create whatever creatures He pleases.

Believe in genetics and atoms all you want because no matter what lies your psuedo scienist man-gods come up with everything ultimately leads back to Jesus. GLORY!!!

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

... but leave it up to others to make their own choice concerning belief in a higher power.

Word is bond!
~Atomic Chimp

But what if the choices they make can be detrimental to the soceity as a whole?

[JennyD]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

You will convince nobody here of your atheistic philosophies, Monkey. This is a Bible-believing, Christian church forum, and you are blaspheming God and insulting His Creation with your "science".

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Hi again Jenny, You responded with, "Um, rabbits DO chew their CUD, and grasshoppers have 4 legs and 2 arms."

Cud is, "Food regurgitated from the first stomach to the mouth of a ruminant and chewed again."Rabbit do not regurgitate food.The food passes all absorption points in their digestive system to the cecum, which is a complicated organ that redigests the food. Then they cecum forces the material back into the colon where it is coated with mucus, then pooped out as cecotrophes. The rabbit then eats the cecotrophes and it is digested correctly. This is a much different process than animals who eat cud.

As for the grasshopper with four legs, let me correct the statement, its says they have four feet. I do not know of any entomologist nor any person who things that grasshoppers have 2 arms. I'm not sure where you get your definition of what arms and legs are or if you've really looked closely at a grasshopper, but it has 6 legs as it should.

I notices you didn't mention how PI is incorrect in the bible. These are only a few examples too.

I'm not claiming this proves god doesn't exist. I'm saying that you scientific beliefs you draw from the bible of are taught are incorrect and that the bible cannot be used as a science book. Many generation have misinterpreted the bible to make science claims that were proven incorrect. If you believe the bible can prove science facts please write a paper and submit it for the noble or templeton award, because you'd surely be awarded it if you could prove that it is scientifically correct.

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp

To elaborate more on Rabbits' digestive systems, the rabbit uses symbiotic relationships with organisms - protists or bacteria, I can't really remember which one - to absorb the nutrients of more hard-to-digest carbohydrates, like cellulose. This raises another question I have. If every creature was perfect in God's image, then why would one organism (the rabbit) need help from another organism (bacteria or protists) to digest their food?

[Atomic Chimp]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

I don't think he prefers the last one, that's just the one that scientific evidence points too.

You are correct LingBlingDingDong, I go where the evidence leads me, but leave it up to others to make their own choice concerning belief in a higher power.

As for science though, believe what you wish but if you try to educate the public with flawed reasoning and scientific misinformation, as an educator I have to step in and point these things out. From your previous posts LingBlingDingDong, I can only assume we're on the same page about that too.

Word is bond!
~Atomic Chimp

[Atomic Chimp]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Hi again Jenny, You responded with, "Um, rabbits DO chew their CUD, and grasshoppers have 4 legs and 2 arms."

Cud is, "Food regurgitated from the first stomach to the mouth of a ruminant and chewed again."Rabbit do not regurgitate food.The food passes all absorption points in their digestive system to the cecum, which is a complicated organ that redigests the food. Then they cecum forces the material back into the colon where it is coated with mucus, then pooped out as cecotrophes. The rabbit then eats the cecotrophes and it is digested correctly. This is a much different process than animals who eat cud.

As for the grasshopper with four legs, let me correct the statement, its says they have four feet. I do not know of any entomologist nor any person who things that grasshoppers have 2 arms. I'm not sure where you get your definition of what arms and legs are or if you've really looked closely at a grasshopper, but it has 6 legs as it should.

I notices you didn't mention how PI is incorrect in the bible. These are only a few examples too.

I'm not claiming this proves god doesn't exist. I'm saying that you scientific beliefs you draw from the bible of are taught are incorrect and that the bible cannot be used as a science book. Many generation have misinterpreted the bible to make science claims that were proven incorrect. If you believe the bible can prove science facts please write a paper and submit it for the noble or templeton award, because you'd surely be awarded it if you could prove that it is scientifically correct.

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

I don't think he prefers the last one, that's just the one that scientific evidence points too.

[JennyD]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Jenny, there was a time where the popular religious view promoted the idea that the sun orbited the earth. Galileo was punished for pointing out the scientific truth.

Please show me where the rabbits that eat its chud are or grasshoppers with only four legs are. The bible speak of both of those things. Also, why not teach that PI is only 3 not 3.14.... the bible claims that too. My point is that religion is a philosophical spiritual belief system, not a science. Again and Again through history religion has stood up against scientific advancements and truths and each time it eventually gives in when the church finally realizes it was incorrect in trying to use the bible as a science book.

Again you can believe in any god just don't try to mix it with science. Even the astronomer at the Vatican believe that by doing this you hurt not only science but also you religion. BTW, he is a scientist too!

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp

Um, rabbits DO chew their CUD, and grasshoppers have 4 legs and 2 arms.

God's Word is God's Word. Either it's what the Creator of the Universe wants us to read and believe, or He has deliberately misled us, or there is no Creator.

I'm guessing you prefer the final option.

[Atomic Chimp]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Jenny, there was a time where the popular religious view promoted the idea that the sun orbited the earth. Galileo was punished for pointing out the scientific truth.

Please show me where the rabbits that eat its chud are or grasshoppers with only four legs are. The bible speak of both of those things. Also, why not teach that PI is only 3 not 3.14.... the bible claims that too. My point is that religion is a philosophical spiritual belief system, not a science. Again and Again through history religion has stood up against scientific advancements and truths and each time it eventually gives in when the church finally realizes it was incorrect in trying to use the bible as a science book.

Again you can believe in any god just don't try to mix it with science. Even the astronomer at the Vatican believe that by doing this you hurt not only science but also you religion. BTW, he is a scientist too!

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp

[Atomic Chimp]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Maria, you call what I mention "so-called 'science' ". Again, I'll mention that this so called science is the backbone of biology and modern medicine. If you truly believe it is the work of satan, please discontinue all visits to your doctor, the hospital and the taking of any form of medication since they all are developed through the application of evolutionary sciences. Make sure your kids do not get any inoculation to protect them form any kind of disease because they too are due to the evilution you feel is so wrong.

You can believe in any god you wish, and I can respect that, just don't preach about the things you don't have a proper education in.

If you feel you can prove these sciences are wrong, please educate me with the evidence and citation to back up your assertions.

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp

[JennyD]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Again, I'm not trying to change you religious beliefs, I have many friends of various beliefs and respect that. I'm only here to correct the flawed reasoning, misunderstandings, logical fallacies and incorrect information that you promote concerning the sciences. You speak like you are very knowledgeable and well educated about the sciences though you statements speak differently about you. Unfortunately for those who are less scientifically informed take the things you assert as facts. I would suggest respect those who are well qualified for educating the public concerning the sciences and that you speak only about the matters you have an erudition in.

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp

Tell me, Radioactive Monkey, how is it that you can "respect" beliefs which you must view as inherently false and ridiculous? We don't "respect" lies, we call them out for what they are.

Also, if you "respect" others' beliefs, then how can you turn around and suggest that we should allow our children to be brainwashed into believing that the Word of God is a lie?

Creation is spelled out explicitly in the Bible. There's no reference to evolution. Asking us to tell our kids it's OK to believe in evolution is like asking us to tell them that snakes and asses don't talk, and that God isn't who He says He is.

[Atomic Chimp]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

This little monkey worshiper is here to sow seeds of discord, mock christ, and persecute us for following the Holy Word of God rather than his dark masters (Darwin, Marx and satan). We cannot be dissuaded from our Divine Mission so easily, however. Praise Jesus!

Again, I'm not trying to change you religious beliefs, I have many friends of various beliefs and respect that. I'm only here to correct the flawed reasoning, misunderstandings, logical fallacies and incorrect information that you promote concerning the sciences. You speak like you are very knowledgeable and well educated about the sciences though you statements speak differently about you. Unfortunately for those who are less scientifically informed take the things you assert as facts. I would suggest respect those who are well qualified for educating the public concerning the sciences and that you speak only about the matters you have an erudition in.

Word is Bond!
~Atomic Chimp