[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

New Dawkins sighting:

Members of the Landover security team have long known that Darwinist, anti-Jesus polemicist, and Uberathiest Richard Dawkins has been leading a secret life as a Mormon woman, but it was only with the recent raid on the polygamist Waiting For Satan Ranch that we were able to obtain photographic proof.

Compare this photo of the brainwashed Mormon women (OK, I guess that's redundant, if they're Mormon, of course they've been brainwashed)--Dawkins is in the gray lady in center:

with this video of Dawkins, dressed as a man, being completely shown up for the scientific fraud that she is by a group of students from Liberty University in Virginia:

You can see Dawkins's entire sinful talk HERE. I normally wouldn't bother recommending seeing any anti-Christian video, but it's worth seeing just how impoverished are the arguments put forward by Dawkins, the world's leading athiest. About the only points that he scores are his criticism of Catholicism as polytheistic paganism.

[Dr. Santiago Solo]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Two can play this game...

Are you sure it's not YOU who is distorts the truth and tries to disguise his own ignorance by invoking the name of the God?

This is all I need to know:

Proverbs 3: 5-7

"Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the LORD, and depart from evil."

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Two can play this game...

Are you sure it's not YOU who is distorts the truth and tries to disguise his own ignorance by invoking the name of the God?

Friend,

Were do we hide our ignorance? We openly admit we are fools, holy fools yes, but fools neither less. Our only wisdom is we follow The Word of God(r), the only source of TRUE knowledge.

If anything we take pride in our ignorance friend.

[Cyberax]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

The LORD does as He pleases, we are not who to question his methods. You prefer Einstein over Baby Jesus, so you will spend Eternity in Hell... enoy Satan's tallywacker (I assure you, it is bigger than the ones you are used to drool for).

Two can play this game...

Are you sure it's not YOU who is distorts the truth and tries to disguise his own ignorance by invoking the name of the God?

[Dr. Santiago Solo]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Blah, blah, blah, sickular science, blah, blah...

In short, there should be a LOT of evidence from such a drastic change of lightspeed. We don't see such evidence.

The LORD does as He pleases, we are not who to question his methods. You prefer Einstein over Baby Jesus, so you will spend Eternity in Hell... enoy Satan's tallywacker (I assure you, it is bigger than the ones you are used to drool for).

[Cyberax]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

If the Universe is smaller then it goes to follow the effect of gravity on light has to be greater to get the distortions at the distances observed. in the Wikipedia example is Darwinista science alleges the quasar Q0957+561 is 7.8 billion light years away when Christian science tells us truthfully that quasar Q0957+561 is 300 light years away. That means the gravity effect has to 26 million times stronger than you are calculating for.

Your "Christian science" is neither "science" nor "Christian"...

However, if speed of light was that much faster then it would mean that the electric constant and magnetic permeability of vacuum would be MUCH MUCH smaller.

They are connected by the equation:

c^2 * u * e = 1, where "c" is the speed of light in vacuum, "u" - vacuum permeability and "e" - the electric constant.

That would in turn mean that all electrons would immediately recombine with protons in atom nuclei (i.e. via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture which in our current Universe only works for some radioactive elements).

The weak nuclear force would stop being a 'weak' force, conventional chemistry would break down and so on.

In short, there should be a LOT of evidence from such a drastic change of lightspeed. We don't see such evidence.

[JennyD]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Friend,

What is it with you atheists? Every time we Christians make a point in the argument you claim we are joking? It’s like some kind of messed up version of Godwins law.

I've heard it called Tabor's Law, Brother BJ. Is that the one you mean?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

You almost think that this site is a divine revelation and I have ran into the idea that these people were just pulling my leg. But after looking around for a couple of months and watching the posts and comments, all you see is ignorant truth. <--- Haha Oxymormonic!

As it should be, after all what do we men know in comparison to God? When He talks about the disk of the Earth in Isiah He should know what He is talking about.

The age of the Universe does not matter. Also, it doesn't matter if the speed of light is different beyond our Solar System.

The equation for deflection angle contains only the constants which are measured directly on the Earth.

If the Universe is smaller then it goes to follow the effect of gravity on light has to be greater to get the distortions at the distances observed. in the Wikipedia example is Darwinista science alleges the quasar Q0957+561 is 7.8 billion light years away when Christian science tells us truthfully that quasar Q0957+561 is 300 light years away. That means the gravity effect has to 26 million times stronger than you are calculating for.

[LyingDingDong]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

PS: I still don't understand, is these your REAL believes or are you just a bunch of comedians? The second option seems more and more plausible...

You almost think that this site is divine revelation and I have ran into the idea that these people were just pulling my leg. But after looking around for a couple of months and watching the posts and comments, all you see is ignorant truth. <--- Haha Oxymormonic!

[Talitha]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

PS: I still don't understand, is these your REAL believes or are you just a bunch of comedians? The second option seems more and more plausible...

That's something that Atheists are always trying to throw at us.
I can assure you we are as real as the Fires of Hell in which you and all that blaspheme against God will spend eternity.

[Cyberax]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

You get this number because of the size of the Universe you assume. We TRUE Christians know that the Universe is only 6,000 light years across, not the ludicrous 156 billion light years you secularist maintain. If you adjust the gravitational effect for a 6K Universe I am sure you will find it is 90’.

The age of the Universe does not matter. Also, it doesn't matter if the speed of light is different beyond our Solar System.

The equation for deflection angle contains only the constants which are measured directly on the Earth.

PS: I still don't understand, is these your REAL believes or are you just a bunch of comedians? The second option seems more and more plausible...

[Wash O'Hanley]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

How has this topic reached 9 pages? Any scientist that is also a pastor at this church will tell you that Evolution is a bunch of hooplah. Debate over.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Yes, it's that bad.


Gravitational lensing is an incredibly weak effect. It's nowhere near powerful enough to bend Sun rays by 90 degrees.

Do the math:
phi = 4GM / c2R, where "phi" is the angle of deflection, G - gravitational constant, "c" - speed of light in vacuum, R - radius.

For the Earth:
phi = 4*6.67*10^(-11)*5.97*10^24 / 9*10^16*6.37*10^6 ~= 2.79*10(-9) radians or 5*10-7 degrees.

I.e. the Earth can bend sunlight at the sea level by 0.00000007 degrees. That's a little bit different from the required 90 degrees.

You get this number because of the size of the Universe you assume. We TRUE Christians know that the Universe is only 6,000 light years across, not the ludicrous 156 billion light years you secularist maintain. If you adjust the gravitational effect for a 6K Universe I am sure you will find it is 90’.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

As for the grasshopper with four legs, let me correct the statement, its says they have four feet. I do not know of any entomologist nor any person who things that grasshoppers have 2 arms.

Well, you've obviously never met any Christians, then.

I'm not sure where you get your definition of what arms and legs are or if you've really looked closely at a grasshopper, but it has 6 legs as it should.

What do you mean, as it should? If it had six legs, it would be in defiance of God's Word! You think God should hate grasshoppers? You think the Bible should be wrong because of insects? Friend, you are wrong in the head.

I notices you didn't mention how PI is incorrect in the bible. These are only a few examples too.

What's wrong with 3? Seems like a nice round number to me.

Nope. We try to drive a wedge between secular and spiritual parts of the world.

Exactly like Jesus does! On one side of the wedge are people who are going to Hell, on the other there's people who're going to Heaven. Which will you choose?

Yes, and people also died young without a decent healthcare for millennia.

Stuff and nonsense. What about Methuselah? He didn't have any Clintonite socialist healthcare, and he was just fine.

[Joshua Brooks]

Re: Richard Dawkins runs amok in Minnesota Movie theater!

Joshua, Evolution has much, more evidence from many different sciences than just fossil evidence, involving geology, paleontology, genetics, biology, micro biology and many more.

There is no evidence in favor of evolution. Not geological, paleontological, genetical, biological, or micro biological. No one has ever witnessed one animal transform or break off into another.

Concerning the big bang, the laws of physic didn't exist until after the big bang.

Now that is a common example of pulling psuedo facts out of your rear end. How do you know how anything worked before this supposed Big Bang? I caught you red handed in a lie you sneaky snake.

Chicken DNA only exist before chickens in the sense that a wgon existed before a car. Some of the parts of it DNA existed but not all of them nor in the same sequence.

Assuming the Laws of Physics that exist today existed billions of years ago as your false gods claim then it stands to reason that the atomic instructions for chicken DNA already existed from the start. All the particular atomic properties that would one day form a chicken had to be in place from the start. Otherwise, you're claiming the chickens and the laws of physics that are responsible for their existence popped into existence afterward. Who could have made chickens out of nothing? Jesus, of course. Who would have inserted the programming code for chicken DNA into the laws of physics from the very beginning? Jesus!! As you can see, all roads lead to Jesus.

Evolution is the building upon and expanding of what existed previously.

No, technology is building upon and expanding upon what previously existed. The Laws of Physics, according to your false gods, behave in the exact same way as after the Big Bang. New atomic properties don't just randomly pop out of thin air. Nobody is worried that water will become combustible when it is put in contact with oxygen anytime soon.

We have seen evolution in action in minor changes and total speciation.

No, you haven't.

We have seen new genetic machines developed in an organism through this process, and create new and unique species.

No, you haven't. You are officially a liar.

If you want to believe it was engineered by jesus, that fine with me, but DNA does exist and overwhelming amounts of evidence for evolution in DNA and other schools of the sciences exists. You can doubt it all you want but it doesn't change whats true. I suggest you should get a deeper understanding of what you're trying to refute before saying anything next time.

I think it is you who needs a deeper understanding of what you are attempting to argue in favor of. You clearly have no understanding of genetics. That is understandable seeing that it was made up by some homosexual pseudo scientist while high of weed in his grandmother's basement. That queer probably hasn't thought it all out yet so all the other geeky virgin dorks living in their mother's basements are all making up their own versions of the theory and therefore your information is bound to be alittle off.

From what you said it sounds like you don't believe in atoms either, is this true?! How much science education have you had so far? What is the average age of people posting on this board too?

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=7402

As you will see I have debunked the theory of atoms.

Psuedo-scientists? Sorry to say that if you believe the pioneers of science that brought us evolutionary sciences and the atomic theory are real scientists and you should thank them for you health and modern conveniences.

I'll thank Jesus for the conviences He has provided us.

THANK YOU, JESUS!!! SHOUT GLORY!!!