I was reading news from the drudge report, and I came across this piece in an article:
"The cross-fire on the campus of Dartmouth College came at the first debate of the critical autumn season leading up to the early voting contests in January ahead of the November 2008 election to replace President George W. Bush."
I am still a bit in shock, so bare with me. This election is to replace George W Bush? I thought it was just to give us something to talk about? We aren't seriously going to elect one of these lesser men to run this nation when we already have the best we've ever seen in office, are we?
Why replace something if it ain't broken? Surely there's something we can do to assure W reigns till Jesus returns!
"The cross-fire on the campus of Dartmouth College came at the first debate of the critical autumn season leading up to the early voting contests in January ahead of the November 2008 election to replace President George W. Bush."
I am still a bit in shock, so bare with me. This election is to replace George W Bush? I thought it was just to give us something to talk about? We aren't seriously going to elect one of these lesser men to run this nation when we already have the best we've ever seen in office, are we?
Why replace something if it ain't broken? Surely there's something we can do to assure W reigns till Jesus returns!
Comment