Where is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

[Bobby-Joe]

Look, yes I know I have never severed a day in the military. That a cyst on my backside prevented me from serving at eighteen and years of defending my church here in Iowa have left me to old to join the military but that is besides the point. IN PRINCIPLE I was in the military the entire time. IN PRINCIPLE I was there fighting next to our brave servicemen as the fought against the Islamic hordes in Iraq and that other country. IN PRINCIPLE I have been at war for the last nine years and have seen a lot of hard fighting in places like Fallujah.

So now they want to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell. The one thing that has been stopping gays from openly dying for our country. They supposedly asked the servicemen and their families and they all said they have no problem with it. Well excuse me! When was I asked MY opinion on the matter. After all these years of service with the Army and the Marines IN PRINCIPLE I think I get entitled to an opinion.

This is a matter of PRINCIPLE. People like me who have been there for the last ten years cheering the troops on are being tossed the curb side with the same excuse "no one gives a shit if their squad mate is gay." That's all the thanks I GET for my years of IN PRINCIPLE service to the country.

I don't recognize America anymore.

[Ksevio]

Re: Were is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

I'm surprised people are so against putting the gays out on the front lines in a hostile country thousands of miles away. Wasn't there the same debate about blacks in the military?

[H. Montague Worthington]

Re: Were is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

I agree completely, Bobby-Joe!!!

Nothing in life has caused me more regret than not being able to serve my country in the military thanks to a severe case of bleeding anal fissures caused (most likely) by a case of hemorroids. And to think that I was unable to go to Vietnam.... I remain very, very sad, that I couldn't serve my country, and that's why I am always bending over backwards to help young military recruits whenever I can.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Were is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

I'm surprised people are so against putting the gays out on the front lines in a hostile country thousands of miles away. Wasn't there the same debate about blacks in the military?

Yes, and look at how well that turned out. Before that liberal Truman signed the blatantly undemocratic Executive Order 9981, America's military was the most feared in the world. But after Truman decided that using the military as a social experiment was more important than unit cohesion or military preparedness, our military reached a stalemate in one of those ornamental countries and lost in another. It can only become worse if prancing nancies are given the special privilege of being blown to bits in Towelheadistan.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Where is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

Personally, I think the homos should be offered the opportunity to repent. Those who refuse should be placed in the all-gay platoons.

Combat duty. First in. Before the Marines.

We can call it "Operation Lavender Shield".

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Where is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

Personally, I think the homos should be offered the opportunity to repent. Those who refuse should be placed in the all-gay platoons.

Combat duty. First in. Before the Marines.

We can call it "Operation Lavender Shield".

You have an excellent idea.

We could drop them out of planes behind enemy lines, and let them turn the enemy queer.

[Brother Scott]

Re: Where is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

Personally, I think the homos should be offered the opportunity to repent. Those who refuse should be placed in the all-gay platoons.

Combat duty. First in. Before the Marines.

We can call it "Operation Lavender Shield".

It is times like this that I thank the Lord that I registered here.


Thank you Reverend. You will remain in my prayers until the day Jesus returns and casts the muslims, homos, catholics and anthropologists into hell.


God bless you!

[HTannor]

Re: Where is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

I can feel the pain of those of you who were unable to serve in the military. Those of us who did serve rested easy at night knowing you were back on the home front protecting our loved ones from being raped by the coons that came up with feeble excuses for avoiding the draft.

It was a pity your frailties kept you out of the service, but at least you know you would have been protected from fags.

During my nearly two days of Navy Seal training I was always on the lookout for queers and I'm proud to say I never encountered even one of them. And that shows what an excellent job the Navy did to protect us from that unwanted distraction.

The first day we were doing deep knee bends and I was pleasantly surprised that no one paid any undue attention to my open mouth while gasping for breath.

When the drill instructor sat on my upper legs while I was doing push-ups I knew he was doing that to help me gain strength as opposed to drooling over my finely toned butt.

Ah, yes, good times.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Where is the PRINCIPLE in repealing DADT?

Personally, I think the homos should be offered the opportunity to repent. Those who refuse should be placed in the all-gay platoons.

Combat duty. First in. Before the Marines.

We can call it "Operation Lavender Shield".

I respectably disagree Reverend. The right to die for one's country has been the PRIVILEGE of the worthless and expendable poor of this country for 244 years now. Dying during a time of War is the one of moment when a poor American can actually matter to the rest of us. In the moment of their deaths those poor American's utterly disgusting lives are magically transformed into stories that inspire and uplift us all. That's why we give them publicly paid for graves in national cemetery and not dump their bodies in the trash.

To allow gay men, the very men who the great REAL men captains of war like Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar and Richard the Lionhearted found unfit to serve with, the privilege of dying for their country is to elevate those gay men into the sacred band of American war dead. The last thing REAL American needs is to see a flaming homo's name of a memorial or hear eulogies on why he was such a good man or watch movies inspired by his life.

No. The fighting fate of for the gay man is force him to stay at home during war. Make him live a long productive life full of hot and sweaty man sex That is the fate they deserve.