Tweet
From a sodomite "news" source:
There you have it, folks. She realizes that God's Word and trendy modern liberal notions of fairness are mutually exclusive and that she must choose one only, so she turns her back on the Almighty and embraces political correctness.
As for that bit about "current knowledge of gender and sexual identity formation," she seems to think that she knows more about the workings of creation than does the Creator. Is the Bible (all of it) God's Word, yes or no? Is God omniscient, yes or no? If you answer either of those questions in the negative, what's the point of talking about the Bible at all?
Why do so many Christ-killers support gay "marriage"?
Toby Mannish
The law enacted last week, allowing same-gender couples to legally marry in the District of Columbia, is a governmental matter. Yet, as a member of the clergy, I’ve been asked over and over again about my religious opinion on the matter.
* * *
With Jewish law so firmly in the “no” column, why have I and many of my colleagues said “yes” so loudly and clearly? I can only answer for myself, though I know that at least some of my views are shared by colleagues.
In the stage version of “Fiddler on the Roof,” the main character, Tevye, in lamenting the encroachment of modern life on his small, yet comfortable existence, laments to his wife, “It’s a new world, Golda.” Judaism, though steeped in tradition, is an evolving religion. It is impossible for me, as a 21st century American Jew, to live by a strict interpretation of laws that were first introduced in a societal context completely foreign to modern experience not to mention current knowledge of gender and sexual identity formation.
I support civil and religious marriage not despite my understanding of Jewish tradition but because of it.
Toby Mannish
The law enacted last week, allowing same-gender couples to legally marry in the District of Columbia, is a governmental matter. Yet, as a member of the clergy, I’ve been asked over and over again about my religious opinion on the matter.
* * *
With Jewish law so firmly in the “no” column, why have I and many of my colleagues said “yes” so loudly and clearly? I can only answer for myself, though I know that at least some of my views are shared by colleagues.
In the stage version of “Fiddler on the Roof,” the main character, Tevye, in lamenting the encroachment of modern life on his small, yet comfortable existence, laments to his wife, “It’s a new world, Golda.” Judaism, though steeped in tradition, is an evolving religion. It is impossible for me, as a 21st century American Jew, to live by a strict interpretation of laws that were first introduced in a societal context completely foreign to modern experience not to mention current knowledge of gender and sexual identity formation.
I support civil and religious marriage not despite my understanding of Jewish tradition but because of it.
As for that bit about "current knowledge of gender and sexual identity formation," she seems to think that she knows more about the workings of creation than does the Creator. Is the Bible (all of it) God's Word, yes or no? Is God omniscient, yes or no? If you answer either of those questions in the negative, what's the point of talking about the Bible at all?
Comment