[James Hutchins]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

I have highlighted the single relevant part of your post, camerada Thomas. Are you finally learning (as suggested by Brother Gonzalez) that women are private property, or do you still have your grand delusions about all men having to share equal access to and power over all women? In latter case, why don't you get together with that Red Army fellow and get lost from this CHRISTIAN (not COMMUNIST) forum?

True words, young lady.



My wife, Mrs. Hutchins (some of you may remember her, I barely do) was mine until one day she disappeared, no doubt stolen by a racial person. You might ask what is the relevance. Well, if she was not my property, how could someone of taken her from me!

[Basilissa]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

her husband was to rule over her!

I have highlighted the single relevant part of your post, camerada Thomas. Are you finally learning (as suggested by Brother Gonzalez) that women are private property, or do you still have your grand delusions about all men having to share equal access to and power over all women? In latter case, why don't you get together with that Red Army fellow and get lost from this CHRISTIAN (not COMMUNIST) forum?

[Vengeance Puriel]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

________________________

Romeo,

On the contrary, the passages quoted regarding the 2nd class human, known biblically as a "women," are in fact to be treated as so stated!!!

You are forgetting that our Yahweh god was so pissed at Eve when she transgressed his command not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge, that he therefore gave her severe pain in childbirth, AND, that her husband was to rule over her! (I don't recall any Garden of Eden marriage ceremonies)

All of the disparaging of women passages are in our Bronze and Iron Age thinking bible, therefore, it is to be followed to the letter regarding women, period!

Obviously I couldn't help but notice the "Nun" that unfortunately is getting "none," and if the tables were turned where she was molesting teen boys instead of priests buggering young girls, Catholic church attendance would skyrocket with young boys, praise!


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas



________________________

Eve was Adam's wife, God made her for that role. He ordained their wedding Himself.


Genesis 2:20-24
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

[Red Army]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Yes; well taking your last comment first, in Deuteronomy the reasons are given by Moses as part of his review of history up to the time of writing. God was providing livestock for His Chosen People and so unmitigated savages as Og the Bashanite king, even the Zamzummim before them, opposed God wholeheartedly. In every case these were dealt with appropriately.

So God and Communism face opposition with the same tool: murder. It is quite cheap and clean when done properly. Nice! A point in common between God and Stalin!

Communism also opposed God, handing out murder by diktat quite indiscriminately.

So you say. There are hundreds of pages from the trials, have you read them? If you did not, then you are speaking from your thoughts, and not about facts.

Perhaps the bourgeoisie was not proposed to include the upper middle classes, as you suggest, but did that detail filter down to the Stalins or Molotovs or Trotskys of the day? No. Little thought is required however to appreciate that Russia's cohort of factory owners was not large during the 19th century from which to draw wives or gigolos as the case may be.

You are misleaded here. We do not want bourgeoise women. We want perfect women, a concept that arises with the birth of the new men, the perfect communist men.
The concept of what is a perfect woman changes over the times, and now is stablished by women themselves. I am old, but seing my younger Comrades, I think now perfect women are perfectly recognizable by the armpit hair, blue colored head hair (you have to clarify "head hair", because there is hair all over) and acid B.O.

Marx became envenomed in England you will recall, funded by Engels who at least knew what industry could achieve, but England was a century ahead of Russia. Very often, in conversation, you must have been surprised at who considers themselves "middle class" and only to eager for afternoon champagne parties coupled with other bourgeois decadence as they imagine it to be.

Yes, false concience, that leads to false ideology. Oh, The German Ideology, one of my favourite books evah!

"The Rich" is another ill-defined term. Dukes who've not frittered the stuff away on show-girls, horses and cocaine would qualify I suppose. Not all factory owners are solvent, but those who are are wealthy enough with the odd one or two able to outdo lesser dukes. Engels was no duke but still "The Rich" by certain criteria which, for the lower-middles, certainly includes doctors and lawyers in big houses with nice gardens whether or not they have servants.

Property defines bourgoise. Otherwise, it would be just envy of those who have more. And it is not.
As exploitation, bourgoise is an objective concepts. You can earn a lot and be exploited, because what you generate is not given to you but taken as profit for the company. Yes, you can be a rich manager and exploited as you generate more than what you get.
Also, you can be poor as poor can be and still be exploiting people, and a bourgoise.

The single factor considered by Marx.—.ownership of the means of production.—.does not actually exist. For anyone to think it did there would need to be a recently liberated then cruelly disenfranchised group having little (if any) concept of an industrial revolution. Even if one had been proposed, as happened in China following President Nixon's witness there, it was nipped in the bud by a monstrous ogre following a false religion and hoping to be a god himself. A bigger ogre turned up. His son and his grandchildren were all murdered.

Can you explain what you are trying to address here? I cannot understand it.


Are you typing from a Chinese made phone or laptop? So, are you profiting from what a Communist worker has done for you, and also criticizing the system that lead to you having the opportunity to own what otherwise was directed ONLY to the bourgoise, as a mean of production? That is called hypocrisy.

[Brother D. Thomas]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Dear Mr. D Thomas,


I won't call you brother since we belong to two different religions (something that only indonesians mudslimes realized).


Now, it seems that protestantism is pretty bad for you, since it allows you to mistreathing women. Sure, it is very true that women sins more than mens do, but which women? Those wo are not Christian obviusly. Just look at this photo of a godless feminist whore.



And compare it to a photo of a godly True Christian nun.





Clearly, the verses you are pointing are referred towards non-christian women aka unsaved trash. By claiming that all the womens are whores you are blaspheming Mary and other godly Christian women such as St. Catherina, St. Chiara of Assisi and St. Lucia (which many protestants still celebrate).


However i agree on protestant women being unsaved, since they left the True Church (Matthew 16:18).


Anyway, if you want to repent i suggest you to come to my Church in Rome, confess your sins to me and get baptized.


Amen.

________________________

Romeo,

On the contrary, the passages quoted regarding the 2nd class human, known biblically as a "women," are in fact to be treated as so stated!!!

You are forgetting that our Yahweh god was so pissed at Eve when she transgressed his command not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge, that he therefore gave her severe pain in childbirth, AND, that her husband was to rule over her! (I don't recall any Garden of Eden marriage ceremonies)

All of the disparaging of women passages are in our Bronze and Iron Age thinking bible, therefore, it is to be followed to the letter regarding women, period!

Obviously I couldn't help but notice the "Nun" that unfortunately is getting "none," and if the tables were turned where she was molesting teen boys instead of priests buggering young girls, Catholic church attendance would skyrocket with young boys, praise!


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas



________________________

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Dear Mr. D Thomas,


I won't call you brother since we belong to two different religions (something that only indonesians mudslimes realized).


Now, it seems that protestantism is pretty bad for you, since it allows you to mistreathing women. Sure, it is very true that women sins more than mens do, but which women? Those wo are not Christian obviusly. Just look at this photo of a godless feminist whore.



And compare it to a photo of a godly True Christian nun.





Clearly, the verses you are pointing are referred towards non-christian women aka unsaved trash. By claiming that all the womens are whores you are blaspheming Mary and other godly Christian women such as St. Catherina, St. Chiara of Assisi and St. Lucia (which many protestants still celebrate).


However i agree on protestant women being unsaved, since they left the True Church (Matthew 16:18).


Anyway, if you want to repent i suggest you to come to my Church in Rome, confess your sins to me and get baptized.


Amen.

[Vengeance Puriel]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

___________________





__________________

Vengeance Puriel,

Like I have stated, you obviously have never seen in how a woman can act in her premenstrual stage, at the time of menstruation, and subsequent to their menstruation. Subjectively, this time period takes up the entire month where the woman turns into Satan incarnate!

Now, the "Ladies of the Night" that I am in contact with at the Nevada brothels, hold me dear in my continued efforts to turn them towards Jesus instead of always laying down on the job. As we speak, they are forming a "Harlot Squad" that will make Landover's "God Squad" look like a Boy Scout picnic with chaperones!

Which reminds me, I have to start packing so I can return to Nevada in my godly attempts in saving the Jezebels for Christ Jesus.


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas


___________________

How dare you call Mary that name, your squad is nothing but your imagination, as well as you fake ministry.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

It is backwards, seduction would be free from the chains of monogamy, so we can start seducting each other. You as a woman will have enormous power over those who want to lay with you. And your love could be spread (sexually, romantic, friendly, as you want!) to each and every men on Earth. But only the ones who you choose! And when you say NO, it is NO!!!.

Technically speaking, doctors, lawyers and so on are not bourgoise. Only factory owners are bourgoise.
And you are explaining the revolution because of one factor, I did not think you were so narrow minded, Sister!

I find it hard to follow your line of thought sometimes. I hope is not something you have, but my old age kicking in.

I agree, murder based systems never do well. Communism is based on love for humanity, with an occasional murder, and then another one, isolated, maybe a progrom or two. Maybe a little bit more, very close to a genocide. But the fundamentals are the love for humanity.

Christianity, on the other hand...

Deuteronomy 2:33-34 …

And that is only from the top of my mind, I know there are worst verses than this particular one!

Yes; well taking your last comment first, in Deuteronomy the reasons are given by Moses as part of his review of history up to the time of writing. God was providing livestock for His Chosen People and so unmitigated savages as Og the Bashanite king, even the Zamzummim before them, opposed God wholeheartedly. In every case these were dealt with appropriately.

Communism also opposed God, handing out murder by diktat quite indiscriminately. Perhaps the bourgeoisie was not proposed to include the upper middle classes, as you suggest, but did that detail filter down to the Stalins or Molotovs or Trotskys of the day? No. Little thought is required however to appreciate that Russia's cohort of factory owners was not large during the 19th century from which to draw wives or gigolos as the case may be. Marx became envenomed in England you will recall, funded by Engels who at least knew what industry could achieve, but England was a century ahead of Russia. Very often, in conversation, you must have been surprised at who considers themselves "middle class" and only to eager for afternoon champagne parties coupled with other bourgeois decadence as they imagine it to be.

"The Rich" is another ill-defined term. Dukes who've not frittered the stuff away on show-girls, horses and cocaine would qualify I suppose. Not all factory owners are solvent, but those who are are wealthy enough with the odd one or two able to outdo lesser dukes. Engels was no duke but still "The Rich" by certain criteria which, for the lower-middles, certainly includes doctors and lawyers in big houses with nice gardens whether or not they have servants.

The single factor considered by Marx.—.ownership of the means of production.—.does not actually exist. For anyone to think it did there would need to be a recently liberated then cruelly disenfranchised group having little (if any) concept of an industrial revolution. Even if one had been proposed, as happened in China following President Nixon's witness there, it was nipped in the bud by a monstrous ogre following a false religion and hoping to be a god himself. A bigger ogre turned up. His son and his grandchildren were all murdered.

I Corinthians 15:22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

[Red Army]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

Engels and Marx were comparing the actuality of supposed exploitation of the proletariat in matters of the libido with the need for seduction of wives among the bourgeois. If the wives were in fact common property, as you seem to be suggesting, there would be no need for seduction would there.

It is backwards, seduction would be free from the chains of monogamy, so we can start seducting each other. You as a woman will have enormous power over those who want to lay with you. And your love could be spread (sexually, romantic, friendly, as you want!) to each and every men on Earth. But only the ones who you choose! And when you say NO, it is NO!!!.

Hothouse dilettantes such as Karl Marx lack the need and the desire for contact with reality. The result is failure to distinguish between various strata of the bourgeoisie from factory owners to doctors, university dons, lawyers and so on. Communism therefore could not distinguish between millionaires and the nobility when a nasty Tsar took over from his liberationist predecessor, the true cause of this half-baked ideology ever being considered as a form of government.

Technically speaking, doctors, lawyers and so on are not bourgoise. Only factory owners are bourgoise.
And you are explaining the revolution because of one factor, I did not think you were so narrow minded, Sister!

And although some animals were more equal than others at least they took an egalitarian approach to murder. Of course the whole thing went belly up. Murder based systems never do well.

I find it hard to follow your line of thought sometimes. I hope is not something you have, but my old age kicking in.


I agree, murder based systems never do well. Communism is based on love for humanity, with an occasional murder, and then another one, isolated, maybe a progrom or two. Maybe a little bit more, very close to a genocide. But the fundamentals are the love for humanity.


Christianity, on the other hand...


Deuteronomy 2:33-34
33 And the Lord our God delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people.


34 And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain:



And that is only from the top of my mind, I know there are worst verses than this particular one!

[Brother D. Thomas]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

___________________

Why are you still talking heretic? You actually want us to believe the ladies will protect you from gods wrath? If that's the case you just admitted to being a heratic commie Sinner.

__________________

Vengeance Puriel,

Like I have stated, you obviously have never seen in how a woman can act in her premenstrual stage, at the time of menstruation, and subsequent to their menstruation. Subjectively, this time period takes up the entire month where the woman turns into Satan incarnate!

Now, the "Ladies of the Night" that I am in contact with at the Nevada brothels, hold me dear in my continued efforts to turn them towards Jesus instead of always laying down on the job. As we speak, they are forming a "Harlot Squad" that will make Landover's "God Squad" look like a Boy Scout picnic with chaperones!

Which reminds me, I have to start packing so I can return to Nevada in my godly attempts in saving the Jezebels for Christ Jesus.


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas


___________________

[Brother D. Thomas]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

All whores should be put to death. Plain and simple. I suppose my common sense, plain spoken America is not sinking in.

_________________________________

Brother James Hutchins,

Uh, lets see, you state that ALL whores are to be put to death with biblical support? Would your profound statement included Mother Mary of our beloved Savior at the time?

I ask this because, lets face it, even though it wasn't Marys fault, she was promiscuous, or the least of which, was informally turned into a whorish woman when she was celestially impregnated by her own son, Jesus as Yahweh god incarnate, and not married at the time.

Furthermore, let us keep the term "incest" off the table for now in biological terms, okay? In any event, what a way to start our religion, by poor ol' Joseph possibly listening to Mary shout out "OH GOD, OH GOD" in their bedroom, not really understanding that what she was saying was appropriate at the time with her celestial impregnation.


In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas


_____________________________

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

[Marxist drivel]

Engels and Marx were comparing the actuality of supposed exploitation of the proletariat in matters of the libido with the need for seduction of wives among the bourgeois. If the wives were in fact common property, as you seem to be suggesting, there would be no need for seduction would there.

Hothouse dilettantes such as Karl Marx lack the need and the desire for contact with reality. The result is failure to distinguish between various strata of the bourgeoisie from factory owners to doctors, university dons, lawyers and so on. Communism therefore could not distinguish between millionaires and the nobility when a nasty Tsar took over from his liberationist predecessor, the true cause of this half-baked ideology ever being considered as a form of government.

And although some animals were more equal than others at least they took an egalitarian approach to murder. Of course the whole thing went belly up. Murder based systems never do well.

Commies, papists and free love.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

My beloved True Christians,

I see with a smile the resistance you have to share your women.


This is explained by Karl Marx in the following paragraph of the Communist Manifesto:


“The bourgeois sees in his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women. He has not even a suspicion that the real point is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production. For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce the community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial. Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives. Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.”



Your women are right now a "community" and you share them. Sleeping with your neighbor's wife is your favorite sport. Brother Thomas is right, in saying that if one men has authority over one woman, he has authority over all women!
But you yet defend the property of your women as if they were mere objects, instruments of production of "Soldiers of Christ". And you know, those soldiers from time to time are darker than they should be, or have brown eyes instead of the family's blue eyes. That is the community of women. Why do not abolish the "private property" of women and start to share our love, regardless of the resultant property?


What Brother Thomas is suggesting, and I agree wholeheartedly, isto abolish the family, which also comes with abolishing inheritance by testament (as you will not have any family, all your property after you die belong to the people, or the state that acts in the name of the people's interests, or the Party, or the leader of the Party -small details not to be worried about)


Can you imagine if we were all a big, big family? If you were raised by a community, and you don't know who your father is? A place where you call "uncle" the 17 guys that were with your mother by the time she got pregnant? That will end all wars and all need for property (except of course the property needed by the State, or their representants, in order to defend this paradise from the evil claws of capitalism- small detail not to be worried about)


Thank you Brother Thomas! I have tears in my eyes knowing that someone will pass the torch of revolution to the next generations!

Kraszy Kommies.
People like you live off of the sweat of the populace so you can live in gilded castles. You spout all sorts of rhetoric to baffle and boggle the less educated into blindly following you. Well, that is not going to happen to we True Christians(tm), not today, not on my watch! I have God and Pastor Ezekiel watching my six!

[Red Army]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

My beloved True Christians,

I see with a smile the resistance you have to share your women.


This is explained by Karl Marx in the following paragraph of the Communist Manifesto:


“The bourgeois sees in his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women. He has not even a suspicion that the real point is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production. For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce the community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial. Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives. Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.”



Your women are right now a "community" and you share them. Sleeping with your neighbor's wife is your favorite sport. Brother Thomas is right, in saying that if one men has authority over one woman, he has authority over all women!
But you yet defend the property of your women as if they were mere objects, instruments of production of "Soldiers of Christ". And you know, those soldiers from time to time are darker than they should be, or have brown eyes instead of the family's blue eyes. That is the community of women. Why do not abolish the "private property" of women and start to share our love, regardless of the resultant property?


What Brother Thomas is suggesting, and I agree wholeheartedly, isto abolish the family, which also comes with abolishing inheritance by testament (as you will not have any family, all your property after you die belong to the people, or the state that acts in the name of the people's interests, or the Party, or the leader of the Party -small details not to be worried about)


Can you imagine if we were all a big, big family? If you were raised by a community, and you don't know who your father is? A place where you call "uncle" the 17 guys that were with your mother by the time she got pregnant? That will end all wars and all need for property (except of course the property needed by the State, or their representants, in order to defend this paradise from the evil claws of capitalism- small detail not to be worried about)


Thank you Brother Thomas! I have tears in my eyes knowing that someone will pass the torch of revolution to the next generations!

[James Hutchins]

Re: Thank you for this wonderful forum

___________________________

James Hutchins,


You obviously are not aware of what 30 or more prostitutes can do, especially when it is their “time of the month,” in protecting their beloved Brother D.!!! There is not a God Squad on planet earth that can overtake their resolve in my protection! This is barring the thankful friends that I made at my Greyhound Bus Depot and Nudest Camp Ministries!

For Landover’s sake, I will try and hold these harlots away from Landover's God Squad if they approach my Salvation Bus when returning to Nevada! Of which, these lovely courtesans will be waiting in revenge!




Subsequent to contacting my courtesan friends at the Shady Lady Ranch, near Beatty, Nevada, about your God Squad inflicting possible damage to the Brother D, they sent this picture that Bambi took where "Lickable Chocolate," "Sassy Bum," and "Tricksy" are laughing their cute asses off as if your harmful notion to me was ever going to happen with them being around!



In the name of the hung Savior,

Brother D. Thomas


________________

All whores should be put to death. Plain and simple. I suppose my common sense, plain spoken America is not sinking in.
1 John 2:4

4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.


Ezekiel 23
23 The word of the Lord came again unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, there were two women, the daughters of one mother:
3 And they committed whoredoms in Egypt; they committed whoredoms in their youth: there were their breasts pressed, and there they bruised the teats of their virginity.
4 And the names of them were Aholah the elder, and Aholibah her sister: and they were mine, and they bare sons and daughters. Thus were their names; Samaria is Aholah, and Jerusalem Aholibah.
5 And Aholah played the harlot when she was mine; and she doted on her lovers, on the Assyrians her neighbours,
6 Which were clothed with blue, captains and rulers, all of them desirable young men, horsemen riding upon horses.
7 Thus she committed her whoredoms with them, with all them that were the chosen men of Assyria, and with all on whom she doted: with all their idols she defiled herself.
8 Neither left she her whoredoms brought from Egypt: for in her youth they lay with her, and they bruised the breasts of her virginity, and poured their whoredom upon her.
9 Wherefore I have delivered her into the hand of her lovers, into the hand of the Assyrians, upon whom she doted.
10 These discovered her nakedness: they took her sons and her daughters, and slew her with the sword: and she became famous among women; for they had executed judgment upon her.
11 And when her sister Aholibah saw this, she was more corrupt in her inordinate love than she, and in her whoredoms more than her sister in her whoredoms.
12 She doted upon the Assyrians her neighbours, captains and rulers clothed most gorgeously, horsemen riding upon horses, all of them desirable young men.
13 Then I saw that she was defiled, that they took both one way,
14 And that she increased her whoredoms: for when she saw men pourtrayed upon the wall, the images of the Chaldeans pourtrayed with vermilion,
15 Girded with girdles upon their loins, exceeding in dyed attire upon their heads, all of them princes to look to, after the manner of the Babylonians of Chaldea, the land of their nativity:
16 And as soon as she saw them with her eyes, she doted upon them, and sent messengers unto them into Chaldea.
17 And the Babylonians came to her into the bed of love, and they defiled her with their whoredom, and she was polluted with them, and her mind was alienated from them.
18 So she discovered her whoredoms, and discovered her nakedness: then my mind was alienated from her, like as my mind was alienated from her sister.
19 Yet she multiplied her whoredoms, in calling to remembrance the days of her youth, wherein she had played the harlot in the land of Egypt.
20 For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses.
21 Thus thou calledst to remembrance the lewdness of thy youth, in bruising thy teats by the Egyptians for the paps of thy youth.
22 Therefore, O Aholibah, thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will raise up thy lovers against thee, from whom thy mind is alienated, and I will bring them against thee on every side;
23 The Babylonians, and all the Chaldeans, Pekod, and Shoa, and Koa, and all the Assyrians with them: all of them desirable young men, captains and rulers, great lords and renowned, all of them riding upon horses.
24 And they shall come against thee with chariots, wagons, and wheels, and with an assembly of people, which shall set against thee buckler and shield and helmet round about: and I will set judgment before them, and they shall judge thee according to their judgments.
25 And I will set my jealousy against thee, and they shall deal furiously with thee: they shall take away thy nose and thine ears; and thy remnant shall fall by the sword: they shall take thy sons and thy daughters; and thy residue shall be devoured by the fire.
26 They shall also strip thee out of thy clothes, and take away thy fair jewels.
27 Thus will I make thy lewdness to cease from thee, and thy whoredom brought from the land of Egypt: so that thou shalt not lift up thine eyes unto them, nor remember Egypt any more.
28 For thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will deliver thee into the hand of them whom thou hatest, into the hand of them from whom thy mind is alienated:
29 And they shall deal with thee hatefully, and shall take away all thy labour, and shall leave thee naked and bare: and the nakedness of thy whoredoms shall be discovered, both thy lewdness and thy whoredoms.
30 I will do these things unto thee, because thou hast gone a whoring after the heathen, and because thou art polluted with their idols.
31 Thou hast walked in the way of thy sister; therefore will I give her cup into thine hand.
32 Thus saith the Lord God; Thou shalt drink of thy sister's cup deep and large: thou shalt be laughed to scorn and had in derision; it containeth much.
33 Thou shalt be filled with drunkenness and sorrow, with the cup of astonishment and desolation, with the cup of thy sister Samaria.
34 Thou shalt even drink it and suck it out, and thou shalt break the sherds thereof, and pluck off thine own breasts: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord God.
35 Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Because thou hast forgotten me, and cast me behind thy back, therefore bear thou also thy lewdness and thy whoredoms.
36 The Lord said moreover unto me; Son of man, wilt thou judge Aholah and Aholibah? yea, declare unto them their abominations;
37 That they have committed adultery, and blood is in their hands, and with their idols have they committed adultery, and have also caused their sons, whom they bare unto me, to pass for them through the fire, to devour them.
38 Moreover this they have done unto me: they have defiled my sanctuary in the same day, and have profaned my sabbaths.
39 For when they had slain their children to their idols, then they came the same day into my sanctuary to profane it; and, lo, thus have they done in the midst of mine house.
40 And furthermore, that ye have sent for men to come from far, unto whom a messenger was sent; and, lo, they came: for whom thou didst wash thyself, paintedst thy eyes, and deckedst thyself with ornaments,
41 And satest upon a stately bed, and a table prepared before it, whereupon thou hast set mine incense and mine oil.
42 And a voice of a multitude being at ease was with her: and with the men of the common sort were brought Sabeans from the wilderness, which put bracelets upon their hands, and beautiful crowns upon their heads.
43 Then said I unto her that was old in adulteries, Will they now commit whoredoms with her, and she with them?
44 Yet they went in unto her, as they go in unto a woman that playeth the harlot: so went they in unto Aholah and unto Aholibah, the lewd women.
45 And the righteous men, they shall judge them after the manner of adulteresses, and after the manner of women that shed blood; because they are adulteresses, and blood is in their hands.
46 For thus saith the Lord God; I will bring up a company upon them, and will give them to be removed and spoiled.
47 And the company shall stone them with stones, and dispatch them with their swords; they shall slay their sons and their daughters, and burn up their houses with fire.
48 Thus will I cause lewdness to cease out of the land, that all women may be taught not to do after your lewdness.
49 And they shall recompense your lewdness upon you, and ye shall bear the sins of your idols: and ye shall know that I am the Lord God.


Matthew 7:17-27
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:
25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:
27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.