Re: Hey
The KJV1611 is not a "remake", as you call it. King James was called upon by God to have the Bible translated into English, to wrest control of the (then only in Latin and Greek) Word of God from the Catholic Church. His scribes were supervised by God in the translation of His Word.
Now, you say that all that matters is understanding the meaning behind the words. OK, but when the words change, the meaning is different too.
The "translators" of the New Infidel Version decided to simply DROP scores of verses that they didn't like.
Here is an excellent article on the subject of the NIV: http://www.biblebelievers.com/williams_d1.html
And a heap of other articles on the subject of Bible versions:
Meanwhile, this is my favorite article on the subject of KJV vs. NIV: http://temcat.com/NIV-KJV.htm
And I include this passage from the beginning of the article as a sample:
Have a look at these articles. Or google "KJV vs NIV". You'll find dozens more articles on the subject, all of them roundly condemning the NIV.
Sorry, Charlie. The Bible says not to add to or remove from it, and that's just what those NIV revisionists did. Conveniently, they revised to a version nearly identical to that used by Jehovah Witnesses, who deny the Divinity of Jesus!
The church you claim to attend says the following:
How, then, can this church support using a "version" which cuts out scores of entire verses?!
(Oh, wait, you didn't actually READ the website before saying you went there, did you?)
Originally posted by talan1590
View Post
Now, you say that all that matters is understanding the meaning behind the words. OK, but when the words change, the meaning is different too.
The "translators" of the New Infidel Version decided to simply DROP scores of verses that they didn't like.
Here is an excellent article on the subject of the NIV: http://www.biblebelievers.com/williams_d1.html
And a heap of other articles on the subject of Bible versions:
Meanwhile, this is my favorite article on the subject of KJV vs. NIV: http://temcat.com/NIV-KJV.htm
And I include this passage from the beginning of the article as a sample:
I get no scarcity of questions on the Bible. These questions come by phone—many by long distance, by visitors, and by mail. Many of the questions are regarding the confusing flood of new versions of the Bible. This is especially true in respect to the New International Version, commonly referred to as the NIV. Seeing the NIV is now being urged by many, I am repeatedly asked why I do not also advocate the use of the NIV version and use it in my work of soulwinning.
As I believe it is my duty to give an answer, I will endeavour to pass on some clear and straight-forward reasons why I do not use the NIV, and never intend to use the NIV, in place of the time-honoured and sure King James Version.
Here is Luke 4:4 in the King James Version. In the NIV the underlined words are cut out:
This omission in Luke 4:4 makes the statement of Jesus of little sense. "But by every word of God." Now we have it. The Scriptures are to stay. The Word of God is to feed us. We are to live by the Scriptures. Here Jesus is in conflict with the devil and in this statement our Lord is revealing the efficient weapon against sin and Satan.
Is it not significant that this very mutilated version of Scripture cuts out the very passage that condemns it. This omitted passage condemns the NIV!
Note again that our Divine Guide is showing that man is to live by "every word of God." If "every word" is vital and we need "every word" what can be said in favour of a professed version that omits a whole verse? Not only that but omits scores of passages. I will never use in my work a mutilated version, no matter how popular it may be. The "Scripture of Truth" closes with these important words:-
We should remember also that this solemn warning against taking "away from the words" of God’s Holy Book is given by none other than our Lord Himself.
As I believe it is my duty to give an answer, I will endeavour to pass on some clear and straight-forward reasons why I do not use the NIV, and never intend to use the NIV, in place of the time-honoured and sure King James Version.
Here is Luke 4:4 in the King James Version. In the NIV the underlined words are cut out:
Luke 4:4 "And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."
Luke 4:4 is not the only place where parts of the Word of God have been cut out. There are literally hundreds of omissions in the NIV.This omission in Luke 4:4 makes the statement of Jesus of little sense. "But by every word of God." Now we have it. The Scriptures are to stay. The Word of God is to feed us. We are to live by the Scriptures. Here Jesus is in conflict with the devil and in this statement our Lord is revealing the efficient weapon against sin and Satan.
Is it not significant that this very mutilated version of Scripture cuts out the very passage that condemns it. This omitted passage condemns the NIV!
Note again that our Divine Guide is showing that man is to live by "every word of God." If "every word" is vital and we need "every word" what can be said in favour of a professed version that omits a whole verse? Not only that but omits scores of passages. I will never use in my work a mutilated version, no matter how popular it may be. The "Scripture of Truth" closes with these important words:-
Rev 22:19 "And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
I would fear to stand before the judgment bar of God, if I knowingly had used and upheld a version that had taken away from the Word of God.We should remember also that this solemn warning against taking "away from the words" of God’s Holy Book is given by none other than our Lord Himself.
Sorry, Charlie. The Bible says not to add to or remove from it, and that's just what those NIV revisionists did. Conveniently, they revised to a version nearly identical to that used by Jehovah Witnesses, who deny the Divinity of Jesus!
The church you claim to attend says the following:
The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy. It reveals the principles by which God judges us, and therefore is, and will remain to the end of the world, the true center of Christian union, and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and religious opinions should be tried. All Scripture is a testimony to Christ, who is Himself the focus of divine revelation.
(Oh, wait, you didn't actually READ the website before saying you went there, did you?)

).

Comment