[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello

That is absolutely ridiculous to think that a religion accepts the raping of children.....I know you have more common sense than that.

Considering this same "religion" has no problems with their false, cooter worship teachings condemn countless millions to hell for all eternity then why is some child rape a problem? Any group of a dress wearing perverts who can teach a woman (the most useless to man of God’s creations) as some kind of Goddess like the Catlickers do with Mary shows they are a collection of freaks capable of the most vilest acts. The symbolism of their fetish for eating fish (doubtlessly tuna) on Fridays is perverted beyond belief.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

Re: Hello

I don't entirely know why they only eat fish on Fridays, and it's not a perverted idea, I think it has something to do with the story of Jesus taking the bread and fish and feeding a thousand people or something.

On Your Knees,

Before you posted that, I didn't know that they "sheltered" the priests. Personally, I don't agree with raping kids, and I know the priests at my parish do not, but my guess is that there aren't enough priests out there today to replace them.

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Hello

but my guess is that there aren't enough priests out there today to replace them.

Anyone can be a priest. If I were to turn my back on Him, I could be a priest by tomorrow with a phone call.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Hello

Before you posted that, I didn't know that they "sheltered" the priests. Personally, I don't agree with raping kids, and I know the priests at my parish do not, but my guess is that there aren't enough priests out there today to replace them.

Do you live in a cave? The fact that the catlick church has a long history of raping children and covering those crimes up is well known. I suppose you also conveniently "didn't know" that the current pope, the nazi ratsinger, got promoted to his current job precisely because he was in charge of the church's pedophilia cover up operations...

The reason they're running out of replacement priests to wear dresses and rape children is that satan is losing in his evil battle for world dominance. Jesus is destroying the filthy roman cult you so admire, and all its adherents. Glory!!

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Hello

Before you posted that, I didn't know that they "sheltered" the priests. Personally, I don't agree with raping kids, and I know the priests at my parish do not, but my guess is that there aren't enough priests out there today to replace them.

So . . . by this logic, you're suggesting that it's OK for the Catholic church to shelter pedophiles and even continue exposing more children to abuse because the church is shortstaffed.

I'm sure you don't intend that, do you?

I mean, it's not like we're talking about keeping someone on who said a cuss word. We're talking about keeping sex offenders in positions where they can find new victims, and cause lasting, if not permanent, psychological and physical damage to people who trust them.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

Re: Hello

Do you live in a cave? Or do you live in a nice, sheltered community in Freehold? If you came into any real city and tried to spread your ridiculous conspiracy theories you wouldn't last a day. Try going into Baltimore, where people TRULY suffer, and say that blacks are inferior to whites.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

Re: Hello

So . . . by this logic, you're suggesting that it's OK for the Catholic church to shelter pedophiles and even continue exposing more children to abuse because the church is shortstaffed.

I'm sure you don't intend that, do you?

I mean, it's not like we're talking about keeping someone on who said a cuss word. We're talking about keeping sex offenders in positions where they can find new victims, and cause lasting, if not permanent, psychological and physical damage to people who trust them.

No, I didn't intend that. I said nothing about that. Don't put words in my mouth; it's rather annoying.

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Hello

No, I didn't intend that. I said nothing about that. Don't put words in my mouth; it's rather annoying.

Specifically asking you to clarify (which you did, thank you) is not putting words in your mouth. Did I not say, "I'm sure you don't intend that, do you?"

As you can see, I gave you the benefit of the doubt, and assumed that you had simply not followed the logic of your statement to its horrifying conclusion.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

Re: Hello

Ok. Fair enough. My fault.

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Hello

Ok. Fair enough. My fault.

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

Re: Hello