I had to adopt

[scherzo]

I had to adopt a suspension of reason in order for me to believe I am condemned, but then I must apply reason in order to receive salvation


my fav Bible verse is,

Romans 14:22
"2Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God."


Church I belong to is, ..... (AFK)

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: I had to adopt

I had to adopt a suspension of reason in order for me to believe I am condemned, but then I must apply reason in order to receive salvation


my fav Bible verse is,

Romans 14:22
"2Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God."


Church I belong to is, ..... (AFK)

If you're here to flame us, better take a look at THIS before making an even bigger ass out of yourself.

If you'd like to find out more about Landover Baptist Church, please read THIS thread created especially for new posters.

If you have a question, use the "search" function before posting it. Most likely it is being discussed somewhere on this Godly forum. Please don't waste God's precious bandwidth.

You will keep a respectful tongue in your head whenever addressing your betters, which includes all True Christians™. Failure to do so, or any attempt at inciting debate or mockery of God's Divine Plan, can and will result in the suspension of your posting privileges.

Your rights on this forum are listed HERE. If you feel that any of these rights have been violated, please don't hesitate to contact a Pastor at once.

[scherzo]

Re: I had to adopt

Have I not spoken God's truth?

the suspension of reason is the original fall of man, where I must adopt reason for salvation is by accepting my sinful nature and then follow God's word in good conscience, that where I am now accountable for my actions on the day we will be Judged

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: I had to adopt

You're speaking gibberish and doubletalk. That's not an introduction. Did satan send you?

[scherzo]

Re: I had to adopt

You're speaking gibberish and doubletalk. That's not an introduction. Did satan send you?

The introduction forum Here is where you introduce yourself. Tell us what church you go to and what your favorite Bible verse is and how you came to find Jesus.

I have answered all your questions,

what church? AFK

fav Bible verse? Romans 14:22

how you came to find Jesus? To accept Jesus, one must accept they are sinful to begin with, as Jesus is our saviour

[Mark Christ]

Re: I had to adopt

What is this "AFK" you speak of? "Away from keyboard"?

[HTannor]

Re: I had to adopt

This Unsaved Trash is playing somewhat coy with us.

Since he is a self-proclaimed sinner, I believe he is trying to hide exactly what sorts of sins he has commited. I suspect homerism.

As for his "church" I have no idea what the full name would be, but I'm guessing the "F" might refer to fairies or fags.

[scherzo]

Re: I had to adopt

guessing the "F" might refer to fairies or fags.

You are pre-occupied with the letter 'F' and without cause give thought to fairies or fags, I shall pray for you. The leftist agenda has succeeded in entering your mind.

there is no such thing as a fairy or fag only straight men who lie with other straight men, which is an abomination.

To consider that someone can 'lean' towards a lifestyle that can be thought of being homosexual, fairy or fag is an agenda brought on by the leftists in government. This agenda gives rise to the idea 'they were born' that way, or they have tendencies/attractions to other men, this simply cannot be.

The homosexual, fag or fairy you speak of is a False god, like that of the African deity 'Jengu' - (Sawa) deity of water spirits, or zeus. They simply do not exist, never have existed, or will ever exist

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: I had to adopt

there is no such thing as a fairy or fag only straight men who lie with other straight men, which is an abomination.

A man who lies with another man is a fag. How can a fag be straight?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: I had to adopt

You are pre-occupied with the letter 'F' and without cause give thought to fairies or fags, I shall pray for you. The leftist agenda has succeeded in entering your mind.

there is no such thing as a fairy or fag only straight men who lie with other straight men, which is an abomination.

To consider that someone can 'lean' towards a lifestyle that can be thought of being homosexual, fairy or fag is an agenda brought on by the leftists in government. This agenda gives rise to the idea 'they were born' that way, or they have tendencies/attractions to other men, this simply cannot be.

The homosexual, fag or fairy you speak of is a False god, like that of the African deity 'Jengu' - (Sawa) deity of water spirits, or zeus. They simply do not exist, never have existed, or will ever exist

See that's what I'm talking about. Nonsense and gibberish.

[scherzo]

Re: I had to adopt

A man who lies with another man is a fag. How can a fag be straight?

Correction, a man who lies with another man is an abomination. The KJV says nothing about 'fag' or 'fairy', your question of, "how can a fag be straight" would have to substitue 'fag' for another noun, as there is no such thing as 'fag' or 'fairy'. The most obvious noun to be used would be 'man'

How can a man be straight?

but even 'straight' is another tool of the leftist agenda. for a man to be straight implies a man can be 'not straight' or 'homosexual', which does not exist.

It may sound I am arguing semantics, but I'm afraid the leftists have succeeded with you as well, as you are confusing the ACT of lying with a man with a pre-existing feeling of wanting to lye with another man

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: I had to adopt

Correction, a man who lies with another man is an abomination. The KJV says nothing about 'fag' or 'fairy', your question of, "how can a fag be straight" would have to substitue 'fag' for another noun, as there is no such thing as 'fag' or 'fairy'. The most obvious noun to be used would be 'man'

How can a man be straight?

but even 'straight' is another tool of the leftist agenda. for a man to be straight implies a man can be 'not straight' or 'homosexual', which does not exist.

It may sound I am arguing semantics, but I'm afraid the leftists have succeeded with you as well, as you are confusing the ACT of lying with a man with a pre-existing feeling of wanting to lye with another man

Indeed. "Fag" is simply a modern non-pejorative word for describing a homosexual. A nickname, if you will.

If you want to argue that a man that lies with another man is not a "homosexual", please go away and find another vein to pop.

Yours in Christ!

[scherzo]

Re: I had to adopt

Indeed. "Fag" is simply a modern non-pejorative word for describing a homosexual. A nickname, if you will.

If you want to argue that a man that lies with another man is not a "homosexual", please go away and find another vein to pop.

Yours in Christ!

Truly I'm not wanting to argue. I'm simply stating fact.

Genisis 1:26

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: .......
27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them....


31And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

God did not create 'homosexuals' he created man and woman. God only created a law that demands that his creation (man) not lye with another (man) for it is an abomination.

The mythical creature called homosexual is one who wants or has feelings of sleeping with another man since birth, aka since creation, as verse 31 clearly says, "behold, it was good" - God has never created a (male) who enjoys, wishes, wants, feels, desires to lye with another man

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: I had to adopt

Truly I'm not wanting to argue. I'm simply stating fact.

Genisis 1:26



God did not create 'homosexuals' he created man and woman. God only created a law that demands that his creation (man) not lye with another (man) for it is an abomination.

The mythical creature called homosexual is one who wants or has feelings of sleeping with another man since birth, aka since creation, as verse 31 clearly says, "behold, it was good" - God has never created a (male) who enjoys, wishes, wants, feels, desires to lye with another man

Yes, our Lord did say this at the beginning and there was no faggotry or "homosexuals" in the Garden of Eden. How could there be? There was only ONE man!

Are you aware that things changed?

"So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." Genesis 3:24 - KJV

It was after the Fall that men and women became sinful, in ways too numerous to list, but including "homosexuality".

Your argument is inane. The bible clearly describes many acts of homosexuality. Just because the word isn't in the Bible means nothing. "Appaloosa" isn't in the Bible either, but any idiot (except for you) would know it is a "horse" which, like homosexuality, is cleary described in the Bible.

Other than the obvious one on the top of your head, what exactly is your point here?

Yours in Christ!

[scherzo]

Re: I had to adopt

what exactly is your point here?

Well my point is actually to introduce myself as this is an introduction area.

it actually is another members pre-occupation with Fags or Faries that has started this discussion.

The bible clearly describes many acts of homosexuality

your statement is my point, they are ACTS of "homosexuality" which is an abomination. But I do not lend any credit to the leftist movement that recognizes the 'homosexual' as a race of men. To identify a "homosexual"" as something other than a man leads to arguments in legislation of "homosexual rights", "gay marriage", "affirmative action" etc. etc.

As it is a ACT (lying man with man) it is something one does, and not something one IS. even after a man lye with another man, which is an abomination, that man is not transformed into a mythical creature called, "homosexual" that man is still a man, he has the anatomy of a man, Just as a man who steals is still a man after stealing so is a man a man after lying with another man. One could call the man who steals a 'thief' but he is still a man, just as a man who lye's with another man can be called, 'homosexual' he is still a man with the anatomy of a man. But the term, homosexual used here is used to describe the act and not what the man is, and there is a difference

HTannor quoted,

As for his "church" I have no idea what the full name would be, but I'm guessing the "F" might refer to fairies or fags

Would HTannor be making a reference to what I have done? or making a reference to my tendencies but not have done?